I don’t know you. with that said you don’t think tavares or stamkos would have been thinking the same stuff or hypotheticals on a snow day in grade 9 while shoveling the driveway? It’s easy to think like this while not in their shoes. If any of us time travelled and got drafted by boston as an 18 year old what do you think we’d do, sit out until traded or try and make the team?
Try to make the team.
When the best players act in one way , there is a way bigger chance that others follow.
I just say how i am raised and how i think about money vs reality. Reality is that the 2mill would serve me better if i gave them to people or organisations that needed them way more. Because my team would be stronger. and the chance of winning higher. And i would feel no other pressure then to perform, not to contract but to my highest ability.
You have to ask yourself , what would be best for my career?. If the answer is 2mill over market value, then you are fooling yourself. A contract like i suggested would change the culture while still make the owners pay a fair amount. And take me one step closer to the ultimate prize.
When the Marner and Matthews and Nylander careers are over and they understand that a paycut that would not change the quality of life for them at all, would increase the chance of a Stanley cup by 80%(just guessing here), they will regret it.
I still blame Tavares contract, it was like a startpistol for "show me the money". He could have gotten more some say. Imagine how the contracts would look then.
I wish we never got Tavares. He became the star the others was aiming for and beyond.