Gary Nylund
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2013
- 31,155
- 24,573
Dreger lol
LMAO that figures. 90% of the people who post here have more credibility with me than that clown.
Dreger lol
Endorsements actually require some level of work, and effort by the party making them feel they earned that money. The state tax doesn't require anything different (assuming you have an accountant). You don't have to film commercials or go to promotional events. You just simply pay less tax.not arguing everything here but...the state tax thing is not the strongest argument...yeah State Tax is better in Tampa but endorsements in Toronto would dwarf endorsement opportunities in Tampa...only reason it isn't strong is because it's easily put aside by the endorsements argument lol
Turns out, you only need 4 of the next 5 years to do it. So really, we can do a max offersheet if we wanted.
Is McDavid and Eichel injury prone ? I assume most would say no.
Matthews played more games over his ELC then both of those players. This injury prone stuff is nonsense. No team pays a player based on them assuming he will be injured going forward.
These types of post are the exact reason people can't stand your "facts" on this board. You purposely use facts that are 1 sided and totally ignore everything else.
Him and Tavares make a great duo on that line. It's not all Marner. Kane isn't the highest paid. He's tied with Toews. Use your words carefully. I explained why Kuch gets more than Stamkos, not my issue if you don't want to believe.Marner drives his line from the wing. How does that factor in? BTW that's not from some stat I read, that's from watching games.
Dreger seems to be completely insane
$10M6Y is not a great contract, but I would have no problem with it. As with the others, if there is an overpayment it's rather inconsequential, and if there is anyone on the team I'd overpay a bit it's Marner. For one, I'd much rather give an irreplaceable player $500K extra than see it go to the depth. But as the market is construed, star players and wingers don't get paid what they deserve. Might not be a good market contract, but it would provide good value.
Endorsements actually require some level of work, and effort by the party making them feel they earned that money. The state tax doesn't require anything different (assuming you have an accountant). You don't have to film commercials or go to promotional events. You just simply pay less tax.
Dreger is basically claiming that someone is going to offer Mitch a max contract. Sorry Dreger, but if a GM offers that he needs to be fired. If Ferris thinks Mitch is worth that, HE should be fired. And Paul really needs to STFU and stay out of this.Dreger lol
if he meets with other teams let him go"Step right up Paul! $19.9M x 4 for your little lad!"
Uhh where do you get this half a dozen number?
I'm actually in shock that he's not jumping on that deal. We live in a salary cap world and if he can't live on 80 million then he has real issues.10 x 8 is on the table. Take it or leave it. You want to be a Leaf or you don't. That's big money. If you grew up a Leafs fan, you should be jumping at locking yourself up long term as one of the top paid wingers in the game. You show loyalty to the team, they'll do everything they can to keep you when the time comes. I truly think Kapanen and Johnsson saved their behinds by coming in at reasonable prices for more than just a year or two. They made it difficult they were getting shipped out for D help. Mitch wrecks his relationship with the organization he'll be gone eventually anyways. The contract won't matter. It's 80 million over 8 years Mitch, you in or you out?
Dreger seems to be completely insane
Not to mention, I think Matthews camp used Malkin, Crosby as comparables and not Eichel or McDavid. Matthews got term equal to their first contracts post ELC and Dubas got him to come down on the cap % because he hadn't accomplished what they had.
Marner has no comparable to any of those 3.
The replies to Dreger on Twitter are hilarious! "Ok Paul", "Sure Paul", "Say hi to Paul" etc etc
Do you think he's turned it down because he thinks he can't live on that?I'm actually in shock that he's not jumping on that deal. We live in a salary cap world and if he can't live on 80 million then he has real issues.
NopeDo you think he's turned it down because he thinks he can't live on that?
Matthews has missed stretches in multiple seasons. I would be more concerned about him. Just my opinion though.
I have not ignored anything. That's not my style. Message board hockey fans like to ignore things like claiming wingers should be paid less than centers but then being unable to explain Kane and Kucherov being highest paid on their teams.