Why are other RFAs bound by their comparables around the league, but Marner can only be compared to one of the greatest goalscoring centers of the last 30 years, just because they're teammates?
To put it bluntly, Marner and his agent Ferris believe Marner is worth how much they can extract out of Dubas in terms of a valid contract, and they can use any comparables they like that serves that agenda, including the use of an OS threat. That is really what it boils down to.
They could use Wayne Gretzky, Tiger Woods and Muhammad Ali as comparables if they wanted to, if it served their purpose and Dubas falls for it and meets their salary demands.
Dubas is in control and he is the one that decides how much Toronto is willing to pay Marner, nobody is holding a gun to his head. Marner can only sign a contract he is presented with, and can't sign himself to any new deal on his terms.
Marner/Agent are simply trying to take advantage financially of the vulnerabilities of a young inexperienced GM, and we will soon find out as to how much that ends up being, when the dust settles on a new contract.
If Marner successfully convinces Dubas that he is equal to Matthews and all other comparables irrelevant, then that is on Kyle (and by extension Shanny who hired and entrusted him with negotiating new contracts) not Mitch.
Most posters are blaming the player when its the GM that is getting played ..
Don't hate the player hate the game !!!