Pasta should have gotten the premium for goal scoring (or so I'm told) and for actually showing progression. Nylander simply was given more then he deserves.
I'm not sure how much of a fact this is but I remember hearing that auston wanted 13+mil on an 8 year deal so he definitely wanted ~McDavid money.
Nylander's 1st year in the NHL was better than anything Pastrnak had on his ELC as well, that was a PPG performance where he was just unlucky. I think Nylander's $500k too much, but the center part is a big x factor
I heard the same on Matthews and I think he was within his rights to use McDavid as a starting point for negotiations, that makes more sense than Marner using Matthews to me.
I didn't forget anything.
When Auston's contract is up he will sign for 15+ mil. That means he will have made at least 103mil after 8 years while McDavid will have made a clean 100mil.
He is signed for basically McDavid money, which is what I said.
cumulative earnings are hugely impacted by which year the player started in, especially with the league doing well. I don't think that Matthews is nearly as good as Crosby, Lemieux, etc but he'll outearn them over the course of the 8 years by a huge margin. The same comparisons will be made with the next guy of the Matthews/Eichel tier where he'll make them look like good deals. McDavid started a year before Matthews, so if the league is averaging a 4-5% cap inflation, discount those cumulative earnings by that factor. Matthews probably still ends up earning closer to McDavid than he deserves, but it would be misleading to think that Matthews just out-earned McDavid
apologies if you meant that he'll make McDavid money factoring in when he goes back to the well, that wasn't addressed in the post I quoted