Salary Cap: Mitch Marner Contract Discussion Part VI | Marner Reportedly Turns Down 8 Year Term

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Babcocks Marner

It's a magical time
Mar 3, 2015
4,109
609
Toronto
According to CJ, Marner isn’t going to be visiting cities about offersheets due to the bad PR he’d get from it. Will still take calls thought.

CJ said talks aren’t really close right now. Thinks it gets done eventually, but the Leafs likely won’t like the number.

Lets pretend this is true..............
Who leaked it? Why on green earth would Marners camp say anything remotely close to this?
Again, IF true, a statement like this would only benefit the Leafs management
It's probably not true though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stamkos4life

TheDoldrums

Registered User
May 3, 2016
12,675
19,369
Kanada
Lets pretend this is true..............
Who leaked it? Why on green earth would Marners camp say anything remotely close to this?
Again, IF true, a statement like this would only benefit the Leafs management
It's probably not true though

Outside of Mirtle, I think CJ seems to have the most inside stuff from Dubas. So yeah, I would think it's coming from the Leafs.
 

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,592
16,753
The Naki
Lets pretend this is true..............
Who leaked it? Why on green earth would Marners camp say anything remotely close to this?
Again, IF true, a statement like this would only benefit the Leafs management
It's probably not true though

This looks more like a "heard it through the grapevine" type roumor rather than being a deliberate leak by somebody

If he talks to other teams and it leaks his position is going to be bloody difficult

The fan base will go crazy
 

indigobuffalo

Portage and Main
Feb 10, 2011
6,790
559
Winnipeg MB
If that’s true and being the highest paid winger in the league is not good enough he might be hard to trade. Also not sure they’ll have to worry about an offer sheet because if 11 million really was turned down what team would offer him more?

From the sounds of it “less is more” so $11M x 7 (offer sheet limit) is better than $11M x 8 (right’s holding club limit).

It’s $11M but eats one less year of UFA.

Still, from the sounds of it an offer sheet will likely be 5 years at $10,568,589 exactly below the limit for 4x 1st rnd pick compensation. That compensation is 2x firsts, a 2nd, and 3rd.

There are probably a few teams planning on trying to negotiate that offer sheet so probably what will happen is the most interested of those rival teams will make a deal with Dubas at some interval between those compensatory amounts, probably 2 1sts, 2 2nds and a prospect (like a Sprong or something). Especially a prospect that might be forced out of the lineup with Mitch incoming.
 

HolyCrap

Registered User
Oct 2, 2015
5,194
5,998
Let him make his calls, if we get lucky he will find somebody stupid enough to give him the contract it's rumored he's demanding

Take the compensation and be done with this ****

Amen. Use the picks and free cap space along with other players moving out And fill up the missing pieces. Albeit there will be a fair few missing positions though. But it’s doable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biotk and Kiwi

Mr Hockey

Toronto
May 11, 2017
11,156
3,662
This looks more like a "heard it through the grapevine" type roumor rather than being a deliberate leak by somebody

If he talks to other teams and it leaks his position is going to be bloody difficult

The fan base will go crazy
He will be disowned if he did that, Marner knows it also... its all fake news
 

The CyNick

Freedom of Speech!
Sep 17, 2009
11,364
2,032
From the sounds of it “less is more” so $11M x 7 (offer sheet limit) is better than $11M x 8 (right’s holding club limit).

It’s $11M but eats one less year of UFA.

Still, from the sounds of it an offer sheet will likely be 5 years at $10,568,589 exactly below the limit for 4x 1st rnd pick compensation. That compensation is 2x firsts, a 2nd, and 3rd.

There are probably a few teams planning on trying to negotiate that offer sheet so probably what will happen is the most interested of those rival teams will make a deal with Dubas at some interval between those compensatory amounts, probably 2 1sts, 2 2nds and a prospect (like a Sprong or something). Especially a prospect that might be forced out of the lineup with Mitch incoming.

What a horrible outcome that would be for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stamkos4life

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,592
16,753
The Naki
He will be disowned if he did that, Marner knows it also... its all fake news

I honestly don't know what the Marner camp is up to

I'd have said that feeding Dreger information about him visiting other cities was a bloody terrible idea as well but it would seem somebody thought it was a decent idea
 
  • Like
Reactions: biotk

Notsince67

Papi and the Lamplighters
Apr 27, 2018
16,376
11,467
Kessel? The guy who was instrumental on 2 cup runs and put up 92 points a year ago? If 94 points is worth 11+ million, I'd say he's not overpaid
He had a career high of 82 points before the contract. before that last year it was a 64 point high. He signed at 12.44% of the cap which is 10.3MM in todays money. Any more questions?
 

Stamkos4life

Registered User
Oct 25, 2018
2,955
2,630
People who defend the nylander signing in comparison to pasta love to post the numbers over their elc as some sort of proof that Will deserved that money, ignoring all sorts of other factors.

Pasta first 3 seasons:
172 gp 123 points = 0.715 ppg

Nylander first 3:
185 gp 135 points = 0.729 ppg

Okay so if ppg over their elc is the deciding factor, why do we have matthews making basically McDavid money?

McDavid first 3 seasons:
209 gp 256 points = 1.225 ppg

Matthews first 3:
212 gp 205 points = 0.966 ppg

For comparrison
Marner:
241 gp 224 points = 0.929 ppg

McDavid beat matthews by 0.259 ppg while marner was only 0.037 ppg behind auston.

So is ppg over elc really the deciding factor? Or just when certain posters want it to be?
 

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,511
24,809
Richmond Hill, ON
CJ said talks aren’t really close right now. Thinks it gets done eventually, but the Leafs likely won’t like the number.

Dubas starting to remind me of Clarence Beeks in the last scene of Trading Places.

 

Babcocks Marner

It's a magical time
Mar 3, 2015
4,109
609
Toronto
This looks more like a "heard it through the grapevine" type roumor rather than being a deliberate leak by somebody

If he talks to other teams and it leaks his position is going to be bloody difficult

The fan base will go crazy

Agreed.
It would also tarnish the brand. So in no way could I see anyone associated with Marner leaking such info.
On the other side, the Leafs seem to be tight lipped on almost everything. So, again, these insiders (much like I defender Nylander for) are vastly out too lunch, and only a faction of what they say ever materializes.

I know Mitch, and Paul, and no, I am not friends with any of them, but being a rink Dad you run into the same people.
I know Mitch bleeds blue and white, I know there are sour feelings with Pridham, but I 99% believe that Mitch will put his foot down and sign before crap hits the fan. Take it for what you will.

I could always change my name to Babcocks Willy....... pretty good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwi

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,825
9,183
From the sounds of it “less is more” so $11M x 7 (offer sheet limit) is better than $11M x 8 (right’s holding club limit).

It’s $11M but eats one less year of UFA.

Still, from the sounds of it an offer sheet will likely be 5 years at $10,568,589 exactly below the limit for 4x 1st rnd pick compensation. That compensation is 2x firsts, a 2nd, and 3rd.

There are probably a few teams planning on trying to negotiate that offer sheet so probably what will happen is the most interested of those rival teams will make a deal with Dubas at some interval between those compensatory amounts, probably 2 1sts, 2 2nds and a prospect (like a Sprong or something). Especially a prospect that might be forced out of the lineup with Mitch incoming.

I don't see Marner signing that...he would be purposely trying to screw the Leafs and not make it any less obvious, and the Leafs would match that deal because he wants Matthews money, so 5 x $11.6 million is what Marner is looking at.
 

Kiwi

Registered User
Mar 5, 2016
21,592
16,753
The Naki
Agreed.
It would also tarnish the brand. So in no way could I see anyone associated with Marner leaking such info.
On the other side, the Leafs seem to be tight lipped on almost everything. So, again, these insiders (much like I defender Nylander for) are vastly out too lunch, and only a faction of what they say ever materializes.

I know Mitch, and Paul, and no, I am not friends with any of them, but being a rink Dad you run into the same people.
I know Mitch bleeds blue and white, I know there are sour feelings with Pridham, but I 99% believe that Mitch will put his foot down and sign before crap hits the fan. Take it for what you will.

I could always change my name to Babcocks Willy....... pretty good.

I hope your right, I've always felt there was a deal that was acceptable for everybody involved but things are getting uglier than I like already

This much stuff in the media isn't a positive development imo
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
People who defend the nylander signing in comparison to pasta love to post the numbers over their elc as some sort of proof that Will deserved that money, ignoring all sorts of other factors.

Pasta first 3 seasons:
172 gp 123 points = 0.715 ppg

Nylander first 3:
185 gp 135 points = 0.729 ppg

Okay so if ppg over their elc is the deciding factor, why do we have matthews making basically McDavid money?

McDavid first 3 seasons:
209 gp 256 points = 1.225 ppg

Matthews first 3:
212 gp 205 points = 0.966 ppg

For comparrison
Marner:
241 gp 224 points = 0.929 ppg

McDavid beat matthews by 0.259 ppg while marner was only 0.037 ppg behind auston.

So is ppg over elc really the deciding factor? Or just when certain posters want it to be?
normalized production is certainly a factor, position is a big factor as well. It's not a single-factor formula by any means though


Matthews doesn't make McDavid money or close to it, McDavid makes over $13M factoring in the year of cap inflation. AAV is a bad comparison for players signing in different years, % of cap is better
 

Throw More Waffles

Unprecedented Dramatic Overpayments
Oct 9, 2015
12,939
9,885
People who defend the nylander signing in comparison to pasta love to post the numbers over their elc as some sort of proof that Will deserved that money, ignoring all sorts of other factors.

Pasta first 3 seasons:
172 gp 123 points = 0.715 ppg

Nylander first 3:
185 gp 135 points = 0.729 ppg

Okay so if ppg over their elc is the deciding factor, why do we have matthews making basically McDavid money?

McDavid first 3 seasons:
209 gp 256 points = 1.225 ppg

Matthews first 3:
212 gp 205 points = 0.966 ppg

For comparrison
Marner:
241 gp 224 points = 0.929 ppg

McDavid beat matthews by 0.259 ppg while marner was only 0.037 ppg behind auston.

So is ppg over elc really the deciding factor? Or just when certain posters want it to be?
The narrative changes based on whatever leaf overpayment we're discussing.

Nylander: Total elc points matter most and ppg matter most. 3rd elc year is no more important than any other elc year. Goals are no more significant than points.

Matthews: Total points and goals don't matter in the slightest, and neither does ppg. It's all just 5v5 goals/60. That's all that matters. We can safetly ignore quite literally every other stat. 73 points career high? Who cares. 5v5 g/60.

Marner: You know that e5v5 goals/60 that mattered more than anything eles in the world for Matthews? Well... they're useless now. They don't matter in the slightest. Neither do the first 2 elc years that mattered so much for Nylander. It's just the actual real point totals on elc year 3. That's it. 94 points. Goals? Those are for chumps. Nobody gets paid for goals.

I have absolutely no idea how so many leaf fans can take the above stance on all 3 players with a straight face. I just don't understand how they don't see the hypocrisy.

All of this spin is done in order to rationalize a rookie gm that doesn't know what he's doing. It will just hurt far too much for everyone to just admit that Dubas pretty much ruined this rebuild with these dramatic overpayments. So instead of facing reality, absolutely absurd contradictory narratives are created.
 

Gallagbi

Formerly Eazy_B97
Jul 5, 2005
49,309
11,916
there will be a portion of the fanbase who will always blame dubas no matter what Marner does now or in the future. Make no mistake if marner leaves on an offersheet for $12M ther would for sure still be working out ways to blame dubas
I don't see a web welcome if he leaves
 

Stamkos4life

Registered User
Oct 25, 2018
2,955
2,630
If Nylander had signed for 600K less Marner would just demand 600K more than he is currently demanding. If Matthews had taken 1.4M less, Marner would just demand 1.4M more. He needs it all.

Careful, you're starting to sound very bitter.

If auston had of signed for reasonable money, I have no doubt marner would've as well. Mitch might yet surprise us and sign a good deal.
 

Canadian Finn

Oskee Wee Wee
Feb 21, 2014
5,093
4,527
The Hammer
The narrative changes based on whatever leaf overpayment we're discussing.

Nylander: Total elc points matter most and ppg matter most. 3rd elc year is no more important than any other elc year. Goals are no more significant than points.

Matthews: Total points and goals don't matter in the slightest, and neither does ppg. It's all just 5v5 goals/60. That's all that matters. We can safetly ignore quite literally every other stat. 73 points career high? Who cares. 5v5 g/60.

Marner: You know that e5v5 goals/60 that mattered more than anything eles in the world for Matthews? Well... they're useless now. They don't matter in the slightest. Neither do the first 2 elc years that mattered so much for Nylander. It's just the actual real point totals on elc year 3. That's it. 94 points. Goals? Those are for chumps. Nobody gets paid for goals.

I have absolutely no idea how so many leaf fans can take the above stance on all 3 players with a straight face. I just don't understand how they don't see the hypocrisy.

All of this spin is done in order to rationalize a rookie gm that doesn't know what he's doing. It will just hurt far too much for everyone to just admit that Dubas pretty muched ruined this rebuild with these dramatic overpayments. So instead of facing reality, absolutely absurd contradictory narratives are created.

This is extremely accurate.
 

Superstar

"Be water, my friend."
Jun 25, 2008
12,825
9,183
normalized production is certainly a factor, position is a big factor as well. It's not a single-factor formula by any means though


Matthews doesn't make McDavid money or close to it, McDavid makes over $13M factoring in the year of cap inflation. AAV is a bad comparison for players signing in different years, % of cap is better

Of course Matthews does...in 5 years when Matthews renews his contract at what? $15 million plus per? What percentage of the cap would that be, while McDavid is still only making $12.5 million against that new cap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stamkos4life
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad