Other posters have often called you out for this.
You latch onto minuscule errors and attack those, even when the main points still hold. This isn't anyone's day job, so it'absolutely ridiculous.
I've shared detailed stats with dates and years attached, but you didn’t respond. Instead, you wait until I’m quickly summarizing to pounce on tiny errors that don't change the argument.
My stats are filtered to ensure fair comparisons.
For example:
- In 2017, Matthews led the league in 5v5 goals per 60 among players with at least 1000 minutes played.
- Guentzel, by contrast, played around 500 minutes that year.
- Even if Matthews was 2nd.. who cares lol, it doesn't change the point.
You Marner supporters and your moving goalposts: you dismiss stats unfavorable to Marner as having "too small a sample size" but ignore sample size when it helps your argument. Marner played 500 mins with Tavares and I was told it's too small a sample size. Yet... Guentzals 500 mins 5v5 g/60 is okay to use and compare to players playing 1000-1200 mins.
The argument still stands:
Matthews led the league in 5v5 goals per 60 in two of his first three seasons without Marner as his linemate. In his third year, he ranked 6th in 5v5 goal scoring and 11th in points per 60 while primarily playing with Marleau, Johnsson, and Kapanen. As his linemates. He was significantly more productive goal scoring with Domi last year than he was with Marner.
Last year Domi had 9 primary assists 5v5 with Matthews in 209 mins.
Marner has 16 primary assists in 720 mins.
If Domi wouldve played 720 mins at his primary assist pace with Matthews, that would be 31 primary assists. Double Marners!
Additionally, It's reasonable to expect a player to be more productive in their mid-20s than in their early years. Matthews was the leagues best 5v5 per 60 in his first few NHL years WITHOUT Marner, its reasonable to expect that Matthews would be even better in his prime when Marner began playing with him.