Player Discussion Mitch Marner, Continued

[Enga Olly]

Yeah, I really don't care what Marner does in the Easy, peasy low contact reg. season when he is after a big contract. They all have their best year right before payday.

that whole "best year" for before the payday is lazy analysis. Many examples of that not being the case. And "easy peasy" regular season. So all that banging around/injuries/82 game grind ain't no thang eh? Just tune in come April and spare everyone your nonsense. For a guy with Sittler as part of his nic - I'd expect a little more perspective and wisdom

 

[ACC1224]

He’s always played with Matthews or Tavares, which one of them moves to the wing so he can go to the middle?



Did you miss this part?
At what point of an emergency would they try it?

Right now they have 1 top 2 center.
Domi isn't a top center, and apparently isn't even 100%, but is playing anyway.

Just seems weird that someone they could play in all situations including penalty killing, someone touted to be 2nd. best forward on the team would refuse to give it a go?

Refused?
Why do we need to constantly make things up to in hopes of making the player look bad?

 

[keonsbitterness]

Yet you watch…

The hypocrisy of posters who say only the playoffs matter but still post here during the regular season is mind boggling.

 

[arso40]

He’s always played with Matthews or Tavares, which one of them moves to the wing so he can go to the middle?

Neither he’s a big boy

 

[ACC1224]

Neither he’s a big boy

I don’t follow

 

[arso40]

I don’t follow

Why does he need to be on a line with either

 

[ACC1224]

Why does he need to be on a line with either

He doesn’t but he was. They weren’t going to make him the 3rd line Center in the previous years.

 

[ULF_55]

Refused?
Why do we need to constantly make things up to in hopes of making the player look bad?

"Just seems weird that someone they could play in all situations including penalty killing, someone touted to be 2nd. best forward on the team would refuse to give it a go?"

Perhaps you misread, or are just making it up?

"would refuse" <> "refused"

 

[arso40]

He doesn’t but he was. They weren’t going to make him the 3rd line Center in the previous years.

Well jt can now

 

[ACC1224]

"Just seems weird that someone they could play in all situations including penalty killing, someone touted to be 2nd. best forward on the team would refuse to give it a go?"

Perhaps you misread, or are just making it up?

"would refuse" <> "refused"

Yes you’re saying he refused or would refuse. Seems made up

Well jt can now

Yes

 

[ULF_55]

Yes you’re saying he refused or would refuse. Seems made up

Yes

Pretty clear "would refuse" is future tense, "refused" is past tense.

Protection mode in overdrive?

 

[keonsbitterness]

Pretty clear "would refuse" is future tense, "refused" is past tense.

Protection mode in overdrive?

"Will refuse" is future, "would refuse" is conditional.

 

[ACC1224]

Pretty clear "would refuse" is future tense, "refused" is past tense.

Protection mode in overdrive?

Equally made up. Do better

 

[ULF_55]

"Will refuse" is future, "would refuse" is conditional.

A possible situation, not something that has happened.