Mitch Marner Continued II

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Marner used to play 30+ in Jr. if he can handle it, why not let him? We have a sports science division for a reason, and if I am not mistaken, these guys have sensors all over their gear to measure how effectively they are moving and if it is indicating that they are tired.

Because this is the NHL and the wear and tear is more intense. Why not have players fresher for the playoffs?
 
There are certainly strikes against advanced stats that statisticians themselves try to correct to be sure. Things like REL stats (to combat being the product of a good team) and looking at the quality of comp and quality of teammate in concert with corsi/xG/etc. I think you have to look at everything really. It also depends on the advanced stats as well.

There are stats like "icorsi" and "iscf" that try to isolate the individual when it comes to advanced stats as to, again, not be the product of a team.

The fact that Marner is elite in almost everything is a good thing. Let's see how the season plays out though. I think the Leafs look like absolute killers with Matthews back and hopefully goaltending works out this year. Both Campbell and Mrazek are capable of going on runs, just hoping they do it in the playoffs.

These stats can be manipulated to show whatever you want them to show. I once saw two obsessed advanced stats guys face off. One was using advanced stats to show that Draisaitl was a beast that year, regardless of McDavid. The other used advanced stats to show that he was entirely dependent on McDavid. Both cases were equally strong. They just stat mined different stats to make their case. A layman would have been convinced by either one of them.

There are people here working overtime to stat mine advanced stats to try and rationalize our players unprecedented dramatic overpayments. It's a staggering amount of effort they put into it.

But no amount of advanced stat spin can alter RESULTS. It's actual RESULTS that matter. Not manipulation of statistics. And no amount of all your spin will change it.

It's not unlucky. It's not puck luck. It's not (lol) every goalie in the playoffs become vezina contenders.

It's our core overpaid players failing to get RESULTS.
 
Last edited:
Mitch has apparently bulked up in legs over summer .. a little slower foot speed but maybe a little stronger for his edges .. this from 2 different people who would know .. so looks like he tried to improve his strength over summer .. this likely comes out for public consumption once he starts to put up apples again
 
Because this is the NHL and the wear and tear is more intense. Why not have players fresher for the playoffs?

Do you have proof this is the case or is this just an assumption? We have a whole division designated to making sure players are fresh
 
Do you have proof this is the case or is this just an assumption? We have a whole division designated to making sure players are fresh
Don't we have a whole coaching staff to make sure the PP doesn't crumble in the playoffs too?
 
We all want playoff success and playoff production.

I just chuckle when I hear Marner, Nylander and Matthews are overpaid bc they don't come through in playoffs and that maybe they are just regular season players.

All NHL players contracts are for regular season only. There isn't a bonus they get for playoffs. Of course playoffs is where it's all on the line and every player wants it so bad but sometimes it just doesnt happen.

So if we're being fair, the Leafs trio have actually performed very well for their contracts in season. Marner is Top5 pt producer. Matthews is the best goal scorer and Nylander has been rather excellent for 6.9M.

Matthews is only making 3 mill more than Brady Tkachuk. That's ridiculous lmao.
 
So was yours.

We were talking about a single player's ice time and how it is being monitored and you started yelling about the powerplay...

It is alright to go back on an opinion if presented with evidence that is against it that you find compelling, this is what a mature individual does.

Your current argument is you know better than Keefe, Marner, and the entire training staff that Marner is not getting the correct ice time.
 
Mind bottling how many seem to forget, misremember or overlook this. Ovi did everything he could and more, it was the team that let him down.

Yup.

Crosby let him down, too. ;)

That dueling hat tricks game was nuts and the whole 2009 Pens-Caps series really. Even without being a final or elimination game it's gotta go down as an all time great game/series.

Marner's Playoff career
32GP, 5G, 20A, 25Pts

Pulling similar sample sizes to start his career
Ovi first 3 playoffs
28GP, 20G, 20A, 40Pts

Ovi's first 4 playoffs
37GP, 25G, 25A, 50Pts
 
We all want playoff success and playoff production.

I just chuckle when I hear Marner, Nylander and Matthews are overpaid bc they don't come through in playoffs and that maybe they are just regular season players.

All NHL players contracts are for regular season only. There isn't a bonus they get for playoffs. Of course playoffs is where it's all on the line and every player wants it so bad but sometimes it just doesnt happen.

So if we're being fair, the Leafs trio have actually performed very well for their contracts in season. Marner is Top5 pt producer. Matthews is the best goal scorer and Nylander has been rather excellent for 6.9M.

Matthews is only making 3 mill more than Brady Tkachuk. That's ridiculous lmao.
All three of them are overpaid when looking at their direct comparables at time of signing. And that's based just on regular season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJK
All three of them are overpaid when looking at their direct comparables at time of signing. And that's based just on regular season.

Nylander 100% wasn't, go look at Pasta's numbers before signing since this seems to be the most common comparison.

Also, Matthews is paid fairly.

Marner is overpaid.
 
Nylander has yet to set a pace of Marners 2nd year. He has been barely past his first.

Marner pts are irrelevant. He cannot dominate. He cannot drive a line. He cannot score.

Nylander 4 pts in 4 GP. Can dominate. He can drive a line. He can score.
 
Marner pts are irrelevant. He cannot dominate. He cannot drive a line. He cannot score.

Nylander 4 pts in 4 GP. Can dominate. He can drive a line. He can score.

Do yourself a favor and don't look up Marner's even-strength goal numbers, they may destroy your narrative.

He doesn't score on the PP is a more accurate assessment.

And Marner can drive a line and has in the past easily.
 
Nylander 100% wasn't, go look at Pasta's numbers before signing since this seems to be the most common comparison.

Also, Matthews is paid fairly.

Marner is overpaid.
Pasta was coming off of a year pacing for 38 goals/77 points. Nylander was coming off a year pacing for (lol) 20 goals/60 points. And if your argument is that Pasta only did that once, so it (lol) doesn't count, then why wasn't marner paid as a 65 point player?
 
Pasta was coming off of a year pacing for 38 goals/77 points. Nylander was coming off a year pacing for (lol) 20 goals/60 points. And if your argument is that Pasta only did that once, so it (lol) doesn't count, then why wasn't marner paid as a 65 point player?

pacing for 40 pts the year before and just over 40 the year before that was probably not doing Pastrnak any favors. Marner was never below 60 and then hit 94, Nylander was also never below 60. Not really hard to see this, if you can't I can't help you.

Also, you inflated Pasta's numbers and brought down Nylander's.
 
And if your argument is that Pasta only did that once, so it (lol) doesn't count, then why wasn't marner paid as a 65 point player?
It's not that it "doesn't count". It's that it's considered in combination with his ~40 point pace the previous 2 years, when he wasn't on a stacked line.
 
We were talking about a single player's ice time and how it is being monitored and you started yelling about the powerplay...

It is alright to go back on an opinion if presented with evidence that is against it that you find compelling, this is what a mature individual does.

Your current argument is you know better than Keefe, Marner, and the entire training staff that Marner is not getting the correct ice time.

No my argument has been since before the season was that Keefe's coaching should be questioned right now after that meltdown in the playoffs.

Any team can have a strategy (when it comes to power play or player fatigue), but it doesn't mean we need to assume they are doing their job correctly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad