mikeyz
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2013
- 7,877
- 7,272
You think anybody remembers playoff numbers that dont end up with a cup?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a12/d2a123b37c314e155021389c4b51486fc36adea2" alt="wtf-realy.gif"
You think anybody remembers playoff numbers that dont end up with a cup?
Playoff numbers without a cup are most definitely remembered, thats a pretty ridiculous statement actually.
@Notsince67 is right. You guys are setting him up to be the next Thornton. It’s not ok we are here for one goal only, to win the cup
anything less is a failure with this core.
True.No. He's not right at all.
He's basically implying that Marner gets a free pass for doing f*** all in the playoffs if they don't win the cup.
True. When you compare Marner's contract to other contracts that are universally considered horrible, Marner's starts to look slightly less terrible.So he is top 7 in salary and been top 5 in points the past 2 seasons. So is he worth it now?
When you look at the contract that Brady Tkachuk just signed and compare it to Marner. Marner has much more value and provides way more upside at his cost than Tkachuk!!!
People need to leave Marner alone. Seeing some of these contracts being handed out. I think Dubas did well in the contracts he signed with our 3 younger players. Way better value.
His closest comparables made 8.5-9.5 on simlar term. It's a horrible contract. Stop trying to defend it.Your right not alot are in the same company. Company of having: 359 pts in 358 games thus far in his 5 year career which had 2 seasons cut short by COVID!!!
Your absolutely right not too many in same company as he!
Oh did I forget to mention 25pts in 32 playoff games.
No. He's not right at all.
He's basically implying that Marner gets a free pass for doing f*** all in the playoffs if they don't win the cup.
His closest comparables made 8.5-9.5 on simlar term. It's a horrible contract. Stop trying to defend it.
People are critical because outrageous contracts come with outrageous expectations. If he wanted fair expectations he should have signed a fair contract, like his direct comparables did.
Don't make shit up. Don't set up a straw man and start slamming me with words I never used. I just choose to not engage in the dumb statistical arguments anymore because it is clear that people are proud of their illiteracy.No. He's not right at all.
He's basically implying that Marner gets a free pass for doing f*** all in the playoffs if they don't win the cup.
Relative | |
Expected | |
Goals % | |
Auston Matthews | 17.80% |
Morgan Rielly | 11.90% |
Wayne Simmonds | 11.80% |
Zach Hyman | 10.20% |
Mitchell Marner | 9.60% |
Pierre Engvall | 9.30% |
Travis Dermott | 6.10% |
Joe Thornton | 5.90% |
Jason Spezza | 5.90% |
Rasmus Sandin | 4.40% |
William Nylander | 1.90% |
Nick Foligno | -2.70% |
TJ Brodie | -3% |
Jake Muzzin | -5% |
Alexander Kerfoot | -8.20% |
Ilya Mikheyev | -9.30% |
Justin Holl | -11.10% |
Zach Bogosian | -20.80% |
Adam Brooks | -20.80% |
Alex Galchenyuk | -20.90% |
Riley Nash | -50.60% |
Lol, his 3 closest comparables at time of signing aren't even on the list. And are any of those players on rfa contracts other than the leafs players? Only Eichel and McDavid I think?Top 20 cap hits in the NHL (all salaries 9.5 million and greater):
1. McDavid: 12.5
2. Panarin: 11.642
3. Matthews: 11.64
4. Karlsson: 11.5
5. Doughty: 11
5. Tavares: 11
7. Marner: 10.9
8. Price: 10.5
8. Kane: 10.5
8. Toews: 10.5
11. Bobrovsky: 10
11. Kopitar: 10
11. Eichel: 10
14. Seguin: 9.85
15. Malkin: 9.5
15. Stone: 9.5
15. Ovechkin: 9.5
15. Benn: 9.5
15. Vasilevsky: 9.5
15. Kucherov: 9.5
In terms of being worth the money, Marner is probably above average. He's not as overpaid as many of you are portraying here.
Since signing the contract 3 years ago, 6th in points, 2nd for primary assists and coming off of NHL first-team right wing award and top ten Selke season.
There is almost anything better to argue about than his contract.
Top 20 cap hits in the NHL (all salaries 9.5 million and greater):
1. McDavid: 12.5
2. Panarin: 11.642
3. Matthews: 11.64
4. Karlsson: 11.5
5. Doughty: 11
5. Tavares: 11
7. Marner: 10.9
8. Price: 10.5
8. Kane: 10.5
8. Toews: 10.5
11. Bobrovsky: 10
11. Kopitar: 10
11. Eichel: 10
14. Seguin: 9.85
15. Malkin: 9.5
15. Stone: 9.5
15. Ovechkin: 9.5
15. Benn: 9.5
15. Vasilevsky: 9.5
15. Kucherov: 9.5
In terms of being worth the money, Marner is probably above average. He's not as overpaid as many of you are portraying here.
Since signing the contract 3 years ago, 6th in points, 2nd for primary assists and coming off of NHL first-team right wing award and top ten Selke season.
There is almost anything better to argue about than his contract.
Now add term and timing to each of those contracts, suddenly the leaf contracts start looking a lot worse. Not to mention most of those guys lead their team to 1 rd of playoff victory at a minimum if not a cup or conN smythe considerations
Lol, his 3 closest comparables at time of signing aren't even on the list. And are any of those players on rfa contracts other than the leafs players? Only Eichel and McDavid I think?
You can't possibly think that that list supports your argument, can you?
Holl and Marner running neck and neck for the annual Larry Murphy award
Never change LeaFlanders never change
wowweewowwowYea just like Ottawa trading Yashin destroyed their future? Trading players has also benefitted teams.
I keep hearing, "just wait, marner is gonna make you look stupid"..... he's had THREE subpar playoffs, he hasn't scored a playoff goal in 921 days! I sure hope he gets it soon! But I definitely think it's fair for this thread to exist. Marner also made about 15 million last year.... I don't think we need to worry about his feelings being hurt because of this thread.
Don't make shit up. Don't set up a straw man and start slamming me with words I never used. I just choose to not engage in the dumb statistical arguments anymore because it is clear that people are proud of their illiteracy.
On this, I will make my last exception.
Accounting for puck luck/bad luck, here is the relative expected goals % for the team for last years playoffs. As you will see, Marner did not do f*** all and only a fool or a person who didnt watch thinks this. Could he have done better? Yes but perhaps there are a number of other targets out there you could focus on whose luck masked their poor play. Edit....you are welcome for the education
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Relative Expected Goals % Auston Matthews 17.80% Morgan Rielly 11.90% Wayne Simmonds 11.80% Zach Hyman 10.20% Mitchell Marner 9.60% Pierre Engvall 9.30% Travis Dermott 6.10% Joe Thornton 5.90% Jason Spezza 5.90% Rasmus Sandin 4.40% William Nylander 1.90% Nick Foligno -2.70% TJ Brodie -3% Jake Muzzin -5% Alexander Kerfoot -8.20% Ilya Mikheyev -9.30% Justin Holl -11.10% Zach Bogosian -20.80% Adam Brooks -20.80% Alex Galchenyuk -20.90% Riley Nash -50.60%
Both are right. Nobody will give a shit in the future but the very notion he did nothing is based on a very narrow and ignorant view of the game. It is as dumb as a comment I once read about Marner not being a good passer. Sounds familiar?
@Notsince67 is right. You guys are setting him up to be the next Thornton. It’s not ok we are here for one goal only, to win the cup
anything less is a failure with this core.
Standards have dropped for him when we are praising him for playing great for passing to Matthews.Honest question, when was the last game he scored a goal? 0 this year, 0 in the playoffs ... when you consider he's top line PP, top line minutes over 20 a night, it's pretty damn pathetic