- Sep 28, 2014
- 78,114
- 125,567
Carter Verhaeghe has 40 goals?
What the f***? Lol
What the f***? Lol
And it will still draw ~16 MM viewers for a sport that's fallen way out of the public view.
NCAAW is a superior product to the Men at this point, so I'm glad people are catching on to it. I will give you a few thousand words on why I love midweek MACtion and even I can't watch NCAAM much anymore.
Carter Verhaeghe has 40 goals?
What the f***? Lol
Matt Boldy hit 30 goals, 60 points.
Jason Robertson hit 101 points.
No more Tall Guys!Philadelphia Flyers: Isaac Ratcliffe slowly developing with Phantoms
It's has been a slow development for Flyers forward prospect Isaac Ratcliffe. He struggled in his first season in the American Hockey League.broadstreetbuzz.com
To be fair to Bettman a good proportion of people in the game as well as fans/media don’t really want to do anything to help grow the game either with their constant gatekeeping of the sport. So it’s not exactly like it’s being handed a Ferrari & smashing it up here. There’s cultural things at play that keep hockey a niche sport in America.
Why is this surprising?I don't know if the general public knows how not close this is. Last year's Cup Finals averaged ~4.6 MM viewers and that was up roughly 84% from 2021.
Add to that the influx of sports betting nationally as how a sport such as basketball can increase interest while hockey's main ingredient is the sport itself. Point spreads are magnetic in betting parlors.Why is this surprising?
How many American kids played ice hockey in HS?
How many American girls played B-ball in HS?
Hockey is doomed to be a niche sport, if the owners had brains, instead of trying to expand and end up with zombie franchises, they'd solidify fan support across the northern tier and limit the amount of teams in the south to areas where there are lots of transplants.
A well run niche can be very lucrative.
Also, as I stated when ESPN was granted NHL broadcast rights, if it was up to the network college field hockey would get more attention. We are seeing that though not in the literal form.
Why is this surprising?
How many American kids played ice hockey in HS?
How many American girls played B-ball in HS?
Hockey is doomed to be a niche sport, if the owners had brains, instead of trying to expand and end up with zombie franchises, they'd solidify fan support across the northern tier and limit the amount of teams in the south to areas where there are lots of transplants.
A well run niche can be very lucrative.
Matt Boldy hit 30 goals, 60 points.
Jason Robertson hit 101 points.
It's the first time it ever happened and it required a 100%+ YOY ratings increase. How is this not surprising? Women's sports are still niche too.
Isn’t women’s basketball biggest consumer older white guys?
At least we don’t have to worry about ELC bonuses.
[insert “women failed the wnba” bill burr joke]It's still not mainly women watching.
Add to that the influx of sports betting nationally as how a sport such as basketball can increase interest while hockey's main ingredient is the sport itself. Point spreads are magnetic in betting parlors.
Also, as I stated when ESPN was granted NHL broadcast rights, if it was up to the network college field hockey would get more attention. We are seeing that though not in the literal form.
It is one isolated instance but descriptive of the medium. In a rare time listening to any sports radio show, I recall a fan calling ESPN's national show and touting the CAR-EDM series of a few years ago. The ESPN host -- remember the King of Sports or whatever they referenced themselves -- said in so many words "No hockey talk Whenever I think of hockey I think of someone named Sven in Minnesota living in his parent's basement." If that was said about any other particular fanbase, for a moment think of womens' basketball since that is the genesis of this current conversation, would the host have a gig the next day? ESPN is a blighted and bloated self-promoting and grandiose scourge that has too many mimicks to even count. And it was a wonderful product at one point when the hosts and anchors put the highlights first and the attitudes second or even better non-existent.ESPN should never get another contract again. It's like they're willing to spend money to bury the sport out of spite.
In seriousness, they probably bought it specifically to try and make it ESPN+ exclusive to boost that platform. Which is horrendous for the NHL.
It is one isolated instance but descriptive of the medium. In a rare time listening to any sports radio show, I recall a fan calling ESPN's national show and touting the CAR-EDM series of a few years ago. The ESPN host -- remember the King of Sports or whatever they referenced themselves -- said in so many words "No hockey talk Whenever I think of hockey I think of someone named Sven in Minnesota living in his parent's basement." If that was said about any other particular fanbase, for a moment think of womens' basketball since that is the genesis of this current conversation, would the host have a gig the next day? ESPN is a blighted and bloated self-promoting and grandiose scourge that has too many mimicks to even count. And it was a wonderful product at one point when the hosts and anchors put the highlights first and the attitudes second or even better non-existent.