I forgot that Laine got traded.
I forgot that Laine got traded.
Why are offside calls and goaltender interference so sacred, that they can be reviewed? Why not review every single goal to make sure there was no illegal play leading up to it? On Columbus' tying goal from the game I'm bitching about, Laine lost his stick, and another Columbus player shoved it across the ice a few feet so he could pick it up more easily. Laine got the puck a second later and made the pass to Jones, who scored. This is a violation of rule 10.3, that means the ref blew the call. Why can't we roll back the tape and check for that, too?
https://cms.nhl.bamgrid.com/images/assets/binary/319997074/binary-file/file.pdf
He scored 10 points in his first 10 games with CBus.
Of course, being Laine, he has managed to put up 3 points in the 12 games since.
Yeah, it's a tough decision where exactly to draw the line, and I'm glad I'm not the one making it, because no matter what you choose, it's gonna piss off a lot of fans.Yeah, it's a good point. Should all goals be reviewed?
Ideally, yes. Practically, no - at least not right now.
And then it could be taken even further - maybe the ref missed a blatant cross check that is obvious upon review and that contributed to a goal being scored illegally. Should that be called back?
I'm not sure what the answer is, but my gut says that if a goal is scored because of a missed offside, and we can easily review it, we probably should. But they've got to find a better solution.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
No. Player Flag Pos Age Ht Wt S/C Exp Birth Date Summary 7 Bill Barber ca LW 23 6-0 195 L/- 3 July 11, 1952 50 G, 62 A, 112 P 3 Tom Bladon ca D 23 6-1 195 R/- 3 December 29, 1952 14 G, 23 A, 37 P 10 Mel Bridgman ca C 20 6-0 190 L/- R April 28, 1955 23 G, 27 A, 50 P 16 Bobby Clarke (C) ca C 26 5-10 185 L/- 6 August 13, 1949 30 G, 89 A, 119 P 15 Terry Crisp ca C 32 5-10 180 L/- 9 May 28, 1943 6 G, 9 A, 15 P 12 Gary Dornhoefer ca RW 32 6-1 190 R/- 11 February 2, 1943 28 G, 35 A, 63 P 6 Andre Dupont ca D 26 6-0 200 L/- 5 July 27, 1949 9 G, 27 A, 36 P 5 Larry Goodenough ca D 23 6-0 195 R/- 1 January 19, 1953 8 G, 34 A, 42 P 17 Paul Holmgren us RW 20 6-3 210 R/- R December 2, 1955 0 G, 0 A, 0 P 30 Gary Inness ca G 26 6-0 195 -/L 2 May 28, 1949 2-0-0, 1.51 GAA 9 Bob Kelly ca LW 25 5-10 200 L/- 5 November 25, 1950 12 G, 8 A, 20 P 26 Orest Kindrachuk ca C 25 5-10 175 L/- 3 September 14, 1950 26 G, 49 A, 75 P 27 Reggie Leach ca RW 25 6-0 180 R/- 5 April 23, 1950 61 G, 30 A, 91 P 18 Ross Lonsberry ca LW 28 5-11 195 L/- 9 February 7, 1947 19 G, 28 A, 47 P 19 Rick MacLeish ca C 26 5-11 185 L/- 5 January 3, 1950 22 G, 23 A, 45 P 29 Jack McIlhargey ca D 23 6-0 190 L/- 1 March 7, 1952 1 G, 2 A, 3 P 33 Jerome Mrazek ca G 24 5-9 160 -/L R October 15, 1951 0-0-0, 9.55 GAA 25 Terry Murray ca D 25 6-2 190 R/- 3 July 20, 1950 0 G, 0 A, 0 P 1 ca G 30 5-10 180 -/L 9 April 3, 1945 6-2-2, 2.35 GAA 11 Don Saleski ca RW 26 6-3 205 R/- 4 November 10, 1949 21 G, 26 A, 47 P 8 Dave Schultz ca LW 26 6-1 190 L/- 4 October 14, 1949 13 G, 19 A, 32 P 21 Bob Sirois ca RW 21 6-0 178 L/- 1 February 6, 1954 0 G, 0 A, 0 P 35 Wayne Stephenson ca G 31 5-9 175 -/L 4 January 29, 1945 40-10-14, 2.58 GAA 30 Bobby Taylor ca G 31 6-1 180 -/L 4 January 24, 1945 3-1-0, 3.75 GAA 2 Ed Van Impe ca D 35 5-10 205 L/- 9 May 27, 1940 0 G, 8 A, 8 P 20 Jimmy Watson ca D 23 6-0 195 L/- 3 August 19, 1952 2 G, 34 A, 36 P 14 Joe Watson ca D 32 5-10 185 L/- 10 July 6, 1943 2 G, 22 A, 24 P 21 Larry Wright ca C 24 6-2 180 L/- 3 October 8, 1951 1 G, 0 A, 1 P
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Girard is a small smurf and plays like one but Makar is def not and does not play like one . Do not put those two in the catagory .With smurfs/softies like Makar and Girard on D? Impossible.
Doesn't matter. Under 6'0'' = softy midget who is a liabilityGirard is a small smurf and plays like one but Makar is def not and does not play like one . Do not put those two in the catagory .
“But muh freedoms!”
The replies are on fire.
Do I need to wear a mask after proving I'm not susceptible? asking for a friend that would actually go into NYC.
If anybody needs a pick-me-up after whatever the hell that overtime was, here is Aho and Nečas murdering Columbus
Think they picked that Bridgeport crew strictly to trigger members of this site lol
Dont Think of it as carolinas success.Carolina's success is a pick me up for Carolina fans, not Flyers fans. There's no picking us up.
The replies are on fire.
I question though if you already gotten Covid (like myself). I already have the natural antibodies...so why would I require the vaccine?
What about B/T cells that have developed memory immunity? Or are natural antibodies no longer a thing?
The replies are on fire.
I question though if you already gotten Covid (like myself). I already have the natural antibodies...so why would I require the vaccine?
What about B/T cells that have developed memory immunity? Or are natural antibodies no longer a thing?
If anybody needs a pick-me-up after whatever the hell that overtime was, here is Aho and Nečas murdering Columbus