Ducks are years ahead of nobody right now. They are bottom feeders. Like I said it’s way too early to tell what they have. What they have now is hype. Nothing more.Essentially lol…I’d rather be a bad team WITH cap space then without it.
At least they are at that point sooner than we are. We have to start selling our contracts, find a zegras/drysdale, get a ton of draft picks, get a respectable prospect pool all over again, and get cap space. Ducks are years ahead of us in this regard. All we are doing is preventing the inevitable. Kings did it right, now the ducks are. Getting to the cap floor is easy….just look at what fletcher hands out lol
Where does this "Torts is a defense first HC" come from?So why go to philly to raise your value and play for a defense first coach? Where does he have a better chance to raise that value, Ducks or FLyers?
Many things to rip on the GM for, this isnt one of them.
Does he stress more D or O?Where does this "Torts is a defense first HC" come from?
If you actually look at his teams, the only defensively oriented team was in CBJ after he lost Panarin, Duchene and Bob. Basically circled the wagons and got them back to the playoffs before the wheels fell off.
Other than that, Torts' teams play a very aggressively style of hockey.
TDA came in 12th in the Norris voting in 2019-20. Provorov was 17th that year.
Sanheim has never received a Norris vote.
Did you just start watching hockey the year you started an account on here?Ducks are years ahead of nobody right now. They are bottom feeders. Like I said it’s way too early to tell what they have. What they have now is hype. Nothing more.
You do realize only forever loser teams like Arizona, Chicago and Buffalo believe in the scorched earth approach So far they have diddly squat to show for it. Some teams have dropped down for a year or two and successfully rebuild. Which ones are the Ducks? Time will tell
Lol two of the teams that supposedly have done "diddly squat" have actually won a cup in ducks/hawksDid you just start watching hockey the year you started an account on here?
They have won the most Stanley Cups ìn the last 13 years.
my point was more about being patient instead of throwing assets away for mid players. There are so many opportunities available but our gm doesn't even consider 1 of them. He just blindly goes into things if players are somewhat available.So why go to philly to raise your value and play for a defense first coach? Where does he have a better chance to raise that value, Ducks or FLyers?
Many things to rip on the GM for, this isnt one of them.
ARE WE NOT BOTTOM FEEDERS LMAO. At least the ducks have hype. We have nothing. no zegras, no drysdale, no mctavish, no zelleweger, no pastujov, no pearreault, nothing. But hey we have hayes, risto, tdaDucks are years ahead of nobody right now. They are bottom feeders. Like I said it’s way too early to tell what they have. What they have now is hype. Nothing more.
You do realize only forever loser teams like Arizona, Chicago and Buffalo believe in the scorched earth approach So far they have diddly squat to show for it. Some teams have dropped down for a year or two and successfully rebuild. Which ones are the Ducks? Time will tell
So why go to philly to raise your value and play for a defense first coach? Where does he have a better chance to raise that value, Ducks or FLyers?
Many things to rip on the GM for, this isnt one of them.
I think he stresses fundamentals, because the more disciplined his team becomes, the more risks he can allow them to take. So it's not about playing conservatively, but playing the "right way."Does he stress more D or O?
What’s that got to do with the current topic? NothingDid you just start watching hockey the year you started an account on here?
They have won the most Stanley Cups ìn the last 13 years.
You realize most of the forwards you listed have a ceiling of value about Hayes. Take Zegras out I hate the punk but his ceiling is higher.ARE WE NOT BOTTOM FEEDERS LMAO. At least the ducks have hype. We have nothing. no zegras, no drysdale, no mctavish, no zelleweger, no pastujov, no pearreault, nothing. But hey we have hayes, risto, tda
You do realize only forever loser teams like Arizona, Chicago and Buffalo believe in the scorched earth approach So far they have diddly squat to show for it.
You said Chicago has won diddly squat....ignoring their 3 Cup wins the last 13 years. I was simply asking if you were unaware or ignorant of this info as a new watcher. Or did you know and just choose to lie?What’s that got to do with the current topic? Nothing
The post doesn't say you need these guys, I'm saying you look at what you have and more often than not these holes reveal themselves. It may be you need a net-front presence. In search of that guy you want a guy that can do it all. If that fails you want a guy that does that better than anyone else even if the rest of his game isn't there. If that fails you get a guy that does it well. You get the picture.Nah, you can go without those players as long as your team is still overall really good. You do not need those highly specific roles.
Now, very generalized roles are quite important. Like having a 1C and 1D.
It depends on what other players can do.The post doesn't say you need these guys, I'm saying you look at what you have and more often than not these holes reveal themselves. It may be you need a net-front presence. In search of that guy you want a guy that can do it all. If that fails you want a guy that does that better than anyone else even if the rest of his game isn't there. If that fails you get a guy that does it well. You get the picture.
Probably not until there is an expanded playoffon another topic….will the nhl ever switch back to the old playoff format? I hate the current setup
Nope. I said they won’t win again.You said Chicago has won diddly squat....ignoring their 3 Cup wins the last 13 years. I was simply asking if you were unaware or ignorant of this info as a new watcher. Or did you know and just choose to lie?
If only Fletcher didn’t botch things and traded Risto. Could’ve made that Klingberg deal and had a low-risk high-leverage situation.
If they didn't re-sign Risto they would have used that money elsewhere. It still would not be available for KLingberg.If only Fletcher didn’t botch things and traded Risto. Could’ve made that Klingberg deal and had a low-risk high-leverage situation.