That's not a bright side with this crew.Ellis’ entire pelvis/hips/groins/abs are messed up. He is not going to be playing this season, and if he does it’ll be one shift, then, ‘Whoops, blew out his lower pelvis again.’
On the bright side, once he’s Rathje’d there will be some cap space to play with.
I always thought he was a smart player. Not sure why he is a buyout.Dang, is he worth maybe a shot? I don't know much about him but a former first rounder who maybe underachieved on an awful team? Or does he just suck?
Dang, is he worth maybe a shot? I don't know much about him but a former first rounder who maybe underachieved on an awful team? Or does he just suck?
Backstory to the McDonagh trade
Big, if true
Backstory to the McDonagh trade
Big, if true
I know the owners will never, ever go for it. But it's pretty much accepted that an NBA-style soft cap would be better, right?
For those that don't know, essentially you can go over by X amount to keep your own players.
Could Fletcher have played that game with Giroux?I generally side with players but to me Tampa Bay played within the rules. I just chalk this one up as it’s business.
Of course it would be nice if the league culture didn’t criticize players for doing what’s best for them before the team/organization & treated it like a true two-way street. But nonetheless that’s not really the case.
Giroux had two months left on his contract, not four years. Also, if you waive Giroux and he is claimed, that means you get zero for him as an asset. Totally different situation than McDonagh.Could Fletcher have played that game with Giroux?
I think it's weird McDonagh wasn't keen on Nashville. That's a pretty good situation as a team, and tax-wise.I generally side with players but to me Tampa Bay played within the rules. I just chalk this one up as it’s business.
Could Fletcher have played that game with Giroux?
Backstory to the McDonagh trade
Big, if true
i don’t really see how the two are relevant to each other. Giroux had a full NMC, he could block a trade to any teams he would want.
McDonagh had a partial NTC, he could only block so many teams in a trade. McDonagh also didn’t have a NMC so he couldn’t block being put on waivers.
The scenarios are different. Giroux was an expiring contract the Flyers were trying to get value for. McDonagh was a big contract Tampa Bay was looking to ditch. Tampa Bay didn’t care about the return for McDonagh. They just wanted to clear the contract. Which they were going to do with either putting him on waivers to be claimed by Columbus or the trade with Nashville.
Tampa Bay came back to McDonagh & told him that they have a deal lined up with Nashville & waiver claim lined up with Columbus. But he was going one way or another. McDonagh just reluctantly picked Nashville over Columbus as a lesser of two evils to him.
I guess this means the 5 teams that finished below Columbus, including the Flyers, all indicated to Tampa Bay that they would not be claiming him? Also, what is Columbus' incentive for telling Tampa Bay that they would claim him?
Giroux had two months left on his contract, not four years. Also, if you waive Giroux and he is claimed, that means you get zero for him as an asset. Totally different situation than McDonagh.
Giroux had a full NMC, so he could not be waived.Could Fletcher have played that game with Giroux?
I don't think they have much to gain by lying. If they claim him they have a disgruntled player and pissed off another GM they would probably like to make deals with in the future.I guess this means the 5 teams that finished below Columbus, including the Flyers, all indicated to Tampa Bay that they would not be claiming him? Also, what is Columbus' incentive for telling Tampa Bay that they would claim him?
Yeah it is just the reality of the hard cap environment. As a player, you take this risk with the reward of a big contract. Both sides know that the last few years of the contract aren't going to be where the value is. I would imagine most of what McDonagh is upset about is that he feels he still contributes a good amount, but the moment it looks like he can't the contract becomes impossible to move without eating money/giving assets.I generally side with players but to me Tampa Bay played within the rules. I just chalk this one up as it’s business.
Of course it would be nice if the league culture didn’t criticize players for doing what’s best for them before the team/organization & treated it like a true two-way street. But nonetheless that’s not really the case.
it's 1:20 seconds of Fletcher and Flahr farting in each other's directionsummary for those who cant listen if you do not mind.