Miscellaneous NHL Discussion CI: Friday, March 8 at 3 p.m. ET. (TV info in OP)

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

Who will win the 2024 Stanley Cup? In this the season of giving, you have two options.

  • Toronto Maple Leafs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • New York Islanders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nashville Predators

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Washington Capitals

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • New Jersey Devils

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Detroit Red Wings

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Arizona Coyotes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Montreal Canadiens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pittsburgh Penguins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • St. Louis Blues

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Calgary Flames

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Minnesota Wild

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Buffalo Sabres

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Seattle Kraken

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Edmonton Oilers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Columbus Blue Jackets

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Anaheim Ducks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chicago Blackhawks

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,149
170,493
Armored Train
Yeah I’d imagine the writing is on the wall. The potential package in Salt Lake City might be enough for the league to finally admit defeat in Arizona.

I wonder what the cost of purchase and relocation of an existing franchise is vs an expansion? If I'm a prospective new owner and the costs are even close to equal, I know I'd rather get that sweet expansion draft instead of getting a fixer upper. We can send the fixer uppers to Quebec, where the maniacs will vigorously support whatever.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
192,871
43,414
I wonder what the cost of purchase and relocation of an existing franchise is vs an expansion? If I'm a prospective new owner and the costs are even close to equal, I know I'd rather get that sweet expansion draft instead of getting a fixer upper. We can send the fixer uppers to Quebec, where the maniacs will vigorously support whatever.

The league has done a good job making expansion franchises value given the recent success, but bottom line is that someone's gonna have to take on the Coyotes and Ryan Smith is a guy they really want in the league, and he's definitely more eager to get in.

Are we going back to Atlanta? I'm sure it will work this time
They will be going back to Atlanta, but they're not going to be pushed out of the market like they were last time.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Beef Invictus

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,207
7,449
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
32 is the magic number for franchises in a major NA sport. One could argue that that number is a few too many. Go over 32 and league divisions get unbalanced and then there aren’t enough quality players to fill out a roster. As far as the NHL is concerned, I’d be more for contraction than expansion. Too many Deslauriers types in the game and every club has some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,149
170,493
Armored Train
That sweet, sweet, expansion fee will be milked as many times as they can. This league is getting to 34 teams in the very near future and then probably going to go up from there.

They absolutely shouldn't because of the talent pool but this is the NHL.

What if I told you we'd need to hit like 60-90 teams to be as watered down as the 70s. A truly great era! An era of Titans! Don't be so negative.
 

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,057
159,997
South Jersey
What if I told you we'd need to hit like 60-90 teams to be as watered down as the 70s. A truly great era! An era of Titans! Don't be so negative.
Striiker would say those are rookie numbers. It's more like 2,000,000,000 teams.

Remember that argument we had on here with someone about Europeans and what not with regards to the watering down of the talent pool? I don't remember details.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,539
160,564
Huron of the Lakes
Remember that argument we had on here with someone about Europeans and what not with regards to the watering down of the talent pool? I don't remember details.

Yup. That person was saying how the league was more talented pound for pound back in the 60s-70s. When it was 90% Canadians. Forget the seismic shift in evaluating the talent at hand.

roger-rabbit.gif
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,284
143,236
Philadelphia, PA
I wonder what the cost of purchase and relocation of an existing franchise is vs an expansion? If I'm a prospective new owner and the costs are even close to equal, I know I'd rather get that sweet expansion draft instead of getting a fixer upper. We can send the fixer uppers to Quebec, where the maniacs will vigorously support whatever.

So Vegas was $500M & Seattle was $650M. Minnesota, Columbus, Atlanta, & Nashville were all $80M in the late 90’s/early 2000’s.

Winnipeg apparently paid $60M to the league in a relocation fee when they bought Atlanta.

So expansion is definitely more profitable & it’s probably been the saving grace for Arizona in recent times but I think it’s getting to a point of no return. How much more money can you sink into this if you’re the league owners? Especially now when you have a liable replacement that makes a ton of sense business wise but also logistically.
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,284
143,236
Philadelphia, PA
Yup. That person was saying how the league was more talented pound for pound back in the 60s-70s. When it was 90% Canadians. Forget the seismic shift in evaluating the talent at hand.

roger-rabbit.gif

Chris Therien & ASF go on that rant every once in a while on their podcast. They both think that because the teams shifted from like 21-24 or whatever when Therien played to 32 now the overall talent pool has stayed the same at best. :laugh:
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,539
160,564
Huron of the Lakes
Chris Therien & ASF go on that rant every once in a while on their podcast. They both think that because the teams shifted from like 21-24 or whatever when Therien played to 32 now the overall talent pool has stayed the same at best. :laugh:

The last 2 expansion teams won playoff rounds in their 1st and 2nd years in the league. With a stockpile of depth players other teams didn't properly value. I think that just about blows up that narrative. Meanwhile, the Flyers have won a single round in 12 years. The league quite recently is discovering how much talent is really beneath the surface.

But you have to be touched in the head to think adding an arsenal of talent from Sweden, Russia, Finland, Czechia, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, Belarus, Slovenia, Slovakia.....has watered anything down. Forget that US hockey has never ever been better -- compare that 2010 Olympics roster to a projected 2026 roster.
 

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,284
143,236
Philadelphia, PA
The last 2 expansion teams won playoff rounds in their 1st and 2nd years in the league. With a stockpile of depth players other teams didn't properly value. I think that just about blows up that narrative. Meanwhile, the Flyers have won a single round in 12 years. The league quite recently is discovering how much talent is really beneath the surface.

But you have to be touched in the head to think adding an arsenal of talent from Sweden, Russia, Finland, Czechia, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, Belarus, Slovenia, Slovakia.....has watered anything down. Forget that US hockey has never ever been better -- compare that 2010 Olympics roster to a projected 2026 roster.

I think Therien’s mindset is obviously biased but I think his logic to go along with the teams have increased is that because guys like Gretzky, Lemuiex, Jagr, Messier, Sakic, Coffey, etc. played during his era that’s reflective of the entire depth pool. Mind you this ignores that every team back then employed at least multiple face punchers with little to no actual ability to make hockey plays.

Look at Nic Deslauries he’s pretty much one of the last face punchers left & he’s pretty much been one of the worst forwards in the league in recent years. If was pre-lockout standards that guy would absolutely be playing closer to the middle the lineup opposed to the last forward in or out.

As for USA Hockey they’re the second biggest talent producer in the league now behind Canada. It’s pretty evident the leaps they’ve grown over the last few decades is pretty apparent. Even at the World Championships where you probably get a better sense for the depth given most of the top players sit out. Those rosters are absolutely considerably better now than they were a decade ago having watched them. They haven’t won gold over that time yet but they’ve gotten absolutely closer as time goes on & they’re an absolute fact in the medal picture now. They were starving off potential relegations a decade or two ago.

A decade ago a guy like Tim Stapleton was one of their better players on the roster at that tournament for example. :laugh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad