29 is still close enough to his prime where 4 million for a guy that can play up and down the lineup is pretty good. He brings a lot to the ice , is durable and can play anywhere you need him. I think he’s a slight bargain at 4 million and he took a discount to stayUnderpaid this contract, agreed. 4 mill for next contract as a 29 year old who will not put up the points he did two years ago and will be surpassed by others...not at all idiotic, because again, we could maybe have re-signed him. It's not that hard to understand that you don't re-sign these guys prior to the season starting...there was no reason to. Business 101.
Those three aren't really the problem in that ranking. We are probably talking a pretty small difference between top and bottom. My guess is less then 3 years. And plenty of teams have a trio of 30 to 35 guys in their top 9.Got the newest THN magazine (had a sub since as long as I can remember). This issue has Faber and Rossi on it, which is awesome in and of itself, but it's the "Rookie Issue". Well I have not gotten that far, but they show the average age of every franchise and Wild are 31 of 32. You all may have already know that...but my gosh...just another variable onto dead cap, injuries, etc.
Also, just another reason to hate the Zucc, Foligno, and Hartman extensions. And for those of you who are happy with 1, 2, or all 3, it is not necessarily that I hate the player or whatever (I do hate the term and $ amount, but thats another point), it's that the Wild could have revisited them in the offseason after flipping them at the TDL, getting some youth in the form of draft picks or prospects, and then seeing what the roster looks like in FA, etc.
Do they factor in Parise and Suter too? I mean, we're paying them.Those three aren't really the problem in that ranking. We are probably talking a pretty small difference between top and bottom. My guess is less then 3 years. And plenty of teams have a trio of 30 to 35 guys in their top 9.
We have Fleury and goligoski who are like 3rd and 8th oldest in the league.
If they do we have 4 of the top 8Do they factor in Parise and Suter too? I mean, we're paying them.
I'm sure you are. He offered a huge discount to get a deal done early. Guerin was quick to re-sign him. You don't have many $4M players with a realistic production of 70 points a season. It's a steal.I'm fine with the Zucc extension if this is going to be his utilization.
This wasn't the discount you think it was. Stop using the Athletic as a market contract source. They themselves say it's not that. He was never going to get those numbers in a real market because of his age and his severely declining 5v5 abilities.I'm sure you are. He offered a huge discount to get a deal done early. Guerin was quick to re-sign him. You don't have many $4M players with a realistic production of 70 points a season. It's a steal.
Don't forget he's playing with a broken arm! While mentoring the whole team.This wasn't the discount you think it was. Stop using the Athletic as a market contract source. They themselves say it's not that. He was never going to get those numbers in a real market because of his age and his severely declining 5v5 abilities.
7-8 million is unrealistic despite the ppg production, true enough, but he'd get at least 6M as a UFA, age and risk taken into account. So he left around 2M a yr on Guerin's desk.This wasn't the discount you think it was. Stop using the Athletic as a market contract source. They themselves say it's not that. He was never going to get those numbers in a real market because of his age and his severely declining 5v5 abilities.
No way he gets more than Pavelski.7-8 million is unrealistic despite the ppg production, true enough, but he'd get at least 6M as a UFA, age and risk taken into account. So he left around 2M a yr on Guerin's desk.
I'm not sure how anyone can argue that extension, but the Foligno one is mind maddening. Even if Billy properly valued Foligno, there are players like him available every free agency period. So extending him for 4 years and hamstringing yourself in a situation like this year where he could have sold Foligno at the deadline for a first or second, makes me lose faith that he's valuing players properly. He was a power forward type that had way more of a scoring touch than Foligno, and I think that influenced that decisionI'm fine with the Zucc extension if this is going to be his utilization.
Also Stutzle playing 1C, Lafreniere & Raymond 2nd line, Byfield 3rd line. No time to check right now but Im sure they all get quite a few minutes. Skipped the top 4 draft picks on purpose clearly.Not expecting anyone to change their minds but just for perspective Rossi vs some of his draft peers on current icetime (last 5 games) and usage (per daily faceoff):
2020 NHL Draft
#7 Alex Holtz - 4th line wing for the Devils playing 6-12 minutes a night
#8 Jack Quinn - injured for Sabres + unsure which line but was playing 12-16 min a night
#9 Marco Rossi - 3rd line (or 4th, debatable i suppose) center playing 11 to 14 minutes a night
#10 Cole Perfetti - 4th line wing for the Jets playing 7 to 14 minutes a night
#12 Anton Lundell - 3rd line center for Florida Panthers playing 13 to 18 minutes a night
#13 Seth Jarvis - 3rd line wing for Hurricanes playing 17 to 20 minutes a night
#14 Dylan Holloway - 4th line wing for Edmonton playing 7 to 12 minutes a night
Not saying this proves or disproves anything. Obviously you can still say qualitatively you'd rather have him playing wherever & getting whatever minutes. Just context.
Plus, this summer, the Wild will need to open spots in the lineup to give prospects like Khusnutdinov, 2022 first-round pick Liam Ohgren, 20, and 2023 second-round pick Riley Heidt a chance to make the team. Heidt, 18, leads the WHL with 101 points, and while he can only play in the NHL or WHL next season (not the AHL because he’ll be under 20), don’t be surprised if the Wild give him a long look in training camp and even give him a trial run into the regular season.
Sounds like Duhaime and/or Dewar could be traded at the deadline due to the need to open space for a possible influx of prospects next season (including Heidt). Also sounds like there’s an outside chance that Yurov could still be signed.
At what cost though? Have to imagine it would take Rossi.Go get Necas.
the only thing you can justify Rossi's demotion with is the winning record of the Wild which arguably may not be any different with Rossi on the 2nd line getting 16+ minutes a night but it is what it is. They had a successful run with Rossi playing big minutes as well. He obviously doesn't play that big of a role singlehandedly on the outcome of Wild games at the moment. Once Foligno is back everything will be shaken up again most likely so let's just wait and see.Not expecting anyone to change their minds but just for perspective Rossi vs some of his draft peers on current icetime (last 5 games) and usage (per daily faceoff):
2020 NHL Draft
#7 Alex Holtz - 4th line wing for the Devils playing 6-12 minutes a night
#8 Jack Quinn - injured for Sabres + unsure which line but was playing 12-16 min a night
#9 Marco Rossi - 3rd line (or 4th, debatable i suppose) center playing 11 to 14 minutes a night
#10 Cole Perfetti - 4th line wing for the Jets playing 7 to 14 minutes a night
#12 Anton Lundell - 3rd line center for Florida Panthers playing 13 to 18 minutes a night
#13 Seth Jarvis - 3rd line wing for Hurricanes playing 17 to 20 minutes a night
#14 Dylan Holloway - 4th line wing for Edmonton playing 7 to 12 minutes a night
Not saying this proves or disproves anything. Obviously you can still say qualitatively you'd rather have him playing wherever & getting whatever minutes. Just context.
Do you think that either of them should, or would on another team?Kind of surprised that not only Duhaime, but Dewar are being shopped. I get it, from their POV. The re-signing of Zucc, Hartman, FG, and Foligno has surely blocked them from getting meaningful TOI in the future, or at least limited their opportunities. It's not easy to score when you get zero PP TOI, mainly D zone starts, and PK duties.