BagHead
Registered User
I can kind of see both of your points, here. I would, personally, use the terminology "general direction" when describing how "at" the official it was, which I think mostly splits the difference, as he obviously intended to send a message without risking actually hitting the ref. I think it's a crazy long suspension for what it was, but I can understand that they needed to do something. Messing with the officials is a big no-no in all sports, and that's also true of hockey.No but it does have to be at him to be "at" him. If it's intentionally not at him, it can't be "at" him.
But hey, agree to disagree. A suspension isn't all bad. Should help our tank to not have him around.