Oh sweet jesus
"
Is it too early in the season to yell, Fire Evason! Asking for a friend.....
Oh sweet jesus
"
It's a good thing we have Yurov, Khusnutdinov, and Ohgren coming next year and the expiring contracts are Zucc, Hartman and Foligno.
"Rossi-Foligno line" is a phrase that shouldn't be said and shouldn't exist at any point, regardless of time of year
Well, when we add them alongside Elias Lindholm, I project this as our lineup:Are you thinking all three of those kids are gonna be on the NHL team and they're not going to fill any holes with vets? That's a bold assumption. And even if it's true it doesn't help us this season in regards to Rossi.
Well, when we add them alongside Elias Lindholm, I project this as our lineup:
Kap-Lindholm-Yurov
Johansson-Eriksson Ek-Boldy
Ohgren-Rossi-Khusnutdinov
I'd prefer Khusnutdinov play center over Rossi, but I'm sure some peope would get their panties in a wad over it.
As I said, they expect Rossi to compete for the puck, and this will of course include some physical play. I don't mean fighting or big hits, but he can't be afraid to touch others to win the puck. Yes he looked slow too, and some lack of strength, but he's been working on that all summer.Expecting a skilled, puck possession oriented, diminutive player to go in and win board battles , make big hits, and battle big trees in front of the net is stupid. If Dean is expecting that then God help us.
What sunk Rossi last year was that he looked slow, and hesitant, not only physically, but also mentally. Rossi's margins for error are too small...he can't afford to be sleepy out there on the ice. He can play aggressively, but in a smart way, stealing pucks on defense, being outstanding positionally, then converting those turnovers into plays that hurt the other team in the most effective way... by putting the puck in the net. Last year, he simply didn't produce. Offensive players can't survive long unless they put the puck in the net. We don't need Rossi to be a gritty, physical banger....that's Kumpulainen and Stramel, maybe, in the future. Rossi needs to get on the scoresheet.
I doubt we'll see those two Russians in the NHL next year, Guerin isn't known for rushing things. Both are also playing on the 3rd line in the KHL, looks like they need some more time.It's a good thing we have Yurov, Khusnutdinov, and Ohgren coming next year and the expiring contracts are Zucc, Hartman and Foligno.
Why practice at all?I'm not excited about the preseason at all. The opening night roster is already set. unless an injury happens. There aren't any roster spots open for one of the prospects to take. The cap isn't there to make it work even if the team wanted to.
I can't get worked up over training camp lines. So what if Rossi is stuck with the scrubs? It's the scrubs that will get the majority of the games in the preseason. FFS it's not worth playing the top of the lineup players until the last few preseason game. There are too many guys desperate to make a name for themselves and do stupid things in the early preseason games.
The lines will be what they'll be on opening night, and I'll have issues with them no matter what they are.
Why practice at all?
We could go back to the conversation that Rossi hasn’t shown he deserves time in the top 6 yet.Yeah that's an entirely separate conversation from the one about where Rossi plays this year with the guys we actually have on the roster.
We could go back to the conversation that Rossi hasn’t shown he deserves time in the top 6 yet.
I mean, at what point does a player have to show something to warrant playing in that spot? Hell, I’m a 6’2” right handed center, maybe I should be given a shot in the top 6 too?Chicken or the egg? How much of an opportunity has Rossi been given to play in a top 6 role in his limited NHL experience? We aren't going to learn anything about him playing a grinder role that he's not suited for. IMO, this is sink or swim time for him. He should start camp playing in the top 6 until he shows he can't cut it. But he needs a legit opportunity.
He's never going to "deserve" it the way you want to measure it, because you want him to be put in a position to fail.We could go back to the conversation that Rossi hasn’t shown he deserves time in the top 6 yet.
I mean, at what point does a player have to show something to warrant playing in that spot? Hell, I’m a 6’2” right handed center, maybe I should be given a shot in the top 6 too?
I'm in favor of starting him higher in the lineup, but I also don't think it's too much to ask to look like a competent NHLer playing on the 3rd line.Are you suggesting that in order to get a real opportunity to play a top 6 role, he first needs to prove himself being able to master a 3rd or 4th line grinder role?
I'm in favor of starting him higher in the lineup, but I also don't think it's too much to ask to look like a competent NHLer playing on the 3rd line.
Foligno and Gaudreau might not be an avenue to put up tons of points, but it shouldn't really have anything to do with the overall eye test.
I'm more talking about 'don't look like you're a right-hand shot playing left-handed'. Be competent at basic NHL things. That would be decent start for me.Yes and no. If a guy is playing on a line with players who play nothing like him, you should expect it to look disjointed, awkward, and bad. If he's playing with guys who play a similar or compatible style, it's going to be an easier adjustment and he's going to be able to play off of them better.
I'm more talking about 'don't look like you're a right-hand shot playing left-handed'. Be competent at basic NHL things. That would be decent start for me.
I wouldn't necessarily agree with this. I was blown away by how bad his puck handling was from the outset last year.Which is weird because he checked all of those boxes until Dean stashed him on the fourth line, right?
So maybe we try something different this year.
That's all I'm asking of the coaching staff at this point. If he fails, he fails. But give him a legit opportunity that lasts longer than 2 or 3 games. Give him 10 games with some quality linemates. And don't make him sit for a mistake when you let Joe Blow on the other end of the bench continue to play after making a similar boneheaded mistake. It gets infuriating watching a kid get benched for one bad turnover when a guy like Zucca makes 2 bad turnovers in the same damn shift.Chicken or the egg? How much of an opportunity has Rossi been given to play in a top 6 role in his limited NHL experience? We aren't going to learn anything about him playing a grinder role that he's not suited for. IMO, this is sink or swim time for him. He should start camp playing in the top 6 until he shows he can't cut it. But he needs a legit opportunity.
It gets infuriating watching a kid get benched for one bad turnover when a guy like Zucca makes 2 bad turnovers in the same damn shift.
Honestly haven't been back to that site in awhileYet another article that bemuses me. Hockey Wilderness' s Justin Hein writes about Adam Beckman, and whether his prospects of making the NHL are diminishing. Fair enough. I then go on to read that Beckman is a scrappy, undersized forward, and is compared to Brad Marchand and Vincent Trochek. Huh? Beckman was a good 6' when he was drafted, and has grown since then. He looks to be at least 6'1", if not more, which is hardly undersized for a winger.
He then goes on to say that there is "plenty of physicality and defense to his game". Huh? Beckman is mediocre defensively, at best, and while long, is hardly physical. It sounds like he is referencing Connor Dewar and Mason Shaw, not the lanky, but decidedly unphysical(if you've ever seen him fight, or in board battles, you'd have to agree), Beckman.
Just one of those things that you read that make you go, hmmm.....
Rossi isn’t even close to the player Caufield is. That’s the disconnect so far in the conversation. Rossi couldn’t outplay Steel or Jost last year. Are you gonna tell me that Caufield wouldn’t have been able to outplay those guys in that role? Please…He's never going to "deserve" it the way you want to measure it, because you want him to be put in a position to fail.
If this was some alternate reality where we had Caufield instead of Rossi, would you be satisfied with putting Caufield next to Foligno and Gaudreau and saying if he can't mesh with their style he can't ever play in the top six with guys like Boldy or Kaprizov?
Or let's look at Boldy, did he have to "deserve" being put next to Fiala, or did we just understand that that was going to be his best chance at success and stick him there anyway?
4th line grinder, no. 3rd line player who shows he actually belongs in the NHL? Yes.Are you suggesting that in order to get a real opportunity to play a top 6 role, he first needs to prove himself being able to master a 3rd or 4th line grinder role?