supsens
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2013
- 6,577
- 2,001
But...he doesn't want to play in Minnesota.
Clearly.
That isn’t the only reason people want NTC’s
But...he doesn't want to play in Minnesota.
Clearly.
Me too. All against your team in the same game.
He was basically a PPG player against Colorado, Vegas and St. Louis. Keep the hot takes coming, thoughCome on guys... Let's be realistic he isn't sniffing those numbers. He shot at 17% for 55 games. Of those 55 games, 32 of them were against Anaheim, SJ, Arizona, and LA.
This is a terrible deal that is going to backfire hard.
Watching him, and the defensive black hole exposed by basically any advance metric. He’s as one dimensional as “one dimensional” gets, not to say bad player or not worth money.One zone player? You're basing that off of what?
His next contract he'll be a UFA. Minnesota will have him under contract for 6 years total which less than most teams hold onto their high profile players.
What high end players are UFA at 24?Most 24 year olds will be UFA's when their brand new medium/long term contract expires. That's kind of how it works. That's like, THE point.
What high end players are UFA at 24?
The implication of the graphic I quoted.Where did you get the idea that we're paying him for his KHL production?
I mean, what if he scores like 60 points next season? This is just an awful contract.
What the hell do I care about the NYR and Shesterkin? I thought we were discussing Kaprizov?Oh so the same should be said for shesterkin and the rangers right?
That’s ridiculous.
1 sub PPG season in the NHL and you get 9 million per year with term that takes you right to UFA?
Instead of asking "has this player played enough games to make this much", start asking "is this player good enough to make this much"
Same situationWhat the hell do I care about the NYR and Shesterkin? I thought we were discussing Kaprizov?
The implication of the graphic I quoted.
In what way? Based on what?
I eagerly anticipate your reply showing me that you never actually watched the player.
No kidding. I'm well aware, I'm just pointing out the Wild get him for less guaranteed time than other teams get their young stars, and coming off his 2nd contract he will be a UFA (which isn't the case for a lot of young players).He's not going to be a UFA at 24, he's going to be a UFA at 29. You wanna ask me how many high end players are UFA at 29 now?
Give me two of these advanced metrics you're talking about.Watching him, and the defensive black hole exposed by basically any advance metric. He’s as one dimensional as “one dimensional” gets, not to say bad player or not worth money.
Again, I have no idea why you're interjecting Shesterkin into this conversation other than it has to do with some sort of potential personal insecurity.Same situation