kingsfan
President of the Todd McLellan fan club by default
Hmmm, maybe agents should consider longevity of their clients contract in conjunction with their salary if they want their guy to remain in the NHL. A team like the Kings that may have better 3rd and 4th line centers in Shore and Stoll, would like to move Richards, but the rest of the NHL sees the contract as toxic waste.
Maybe, that wouldn't be the case if Richards' cap hit was $1.5M less a season. I know, a little far fetched, but something for the players and their agents to think about. Take less money and stick in the NHL when your play declines as it inevitably will.
Maybe GMs should stop being stupid and handing out 8-year deals to players in their late twenties as well. The Kopitar negotiations are going to be very interesting. If Dean is smart, h won't give him more than 5 years.
While I agree signing guys to deals of 8 years (or 12 like Richards did) is silly, no one would have predicted that Richards would fall off this far at the ripe old age of 29, unless he suffered a major injury, to which the LTIR should have been able to handle it. The fault isn't the contract so much, it's Richards performance, or lack there of at an age when he should be still producing at a high level.
Not that this isn't a fair offer, but I would rather keep our 1st and have Lombardi buy out Richards' contract if he can't get his act together in Manchester.
Tell that to the man who would have to hand over a $22 million cheque to buy him out, not to mention we'd still have him on the salary cap for something like 10 more years.