Bouboumaster
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2014
- 10,768
- 9,242
Value of: Mike Matheson
- Thread starter TT1
- Start date
John Mandalorian
2022 Avs: The First Dance
- Nov 29, 2018
- 11,647
- 7,367
Hmmm...
Habs fans 1
McJedi 0
Obvious truth is easy to miss when one operates with thick blinders.
Matheson won't get a 1st this year, BC Hughes wouldn't trade him for that little
samsagat
Registered User
- Jun 20, 2013
- 1,178
- 902
Matheson's playing too much. He's put in a role above his head.
It affects his effectiveness.
But in the proper deployment, he'd be an excellent #3-4.
Give him less playing time, with less responsibilities and he'd be a serviceable defenseman. He skates like the wind, have a good size and can absorb 21-22 good minutes.
He'd worth easily a late 1st + b prospect.
But TD isn't the time when this kind of player (contract) is traded.
Summer would be more appropriate, but not the next one. Later, maybe...
It affects his effectiveness.
But in the proper deployment, he'd be an excellent #3-4.
Give him less playing time, with less responsibilities and he'd be a serviceable defenseman. He skates like the wind, have a good size and can absorb 21-22 good minutes.
He'd worth easily a late 1st + b prospect.
But TD isn't the time when this kind of player (contract) is traded.
Summer would be more appropriate, but not the next one. Later, maybe...
ElPrimeTime
Registered User
I guess that's part of the point of some of the posts here. A playoff team, will value an Ekholm type player over an offensive, PMD with defensive warts all day. It was Barrie, a 1st, a 4th, Reid Schafer (former 1st round pick) for Ekholm and a 6th. Barrie was not netting a 1st round pick himself and I don't believe his value in this trade was equivalent to a 1st.
Now, I'm not comparing Barrie to Matheson, because I haven't watched Matheson enough. But your statement of a "60 point d-man even if he was the worst defensively" being worth a 1st+ is factually wrong since the Preds have been trying to trade Barrie for most of the year. If any team offered the Preds a 1st, he would be long gone by now.
There is a big difference between Barrie and Matheson at this point in their careers. One is still in their prime, the other has dropped off significantly over the past couple years.
4-5 years ago, there's a really good chance that Barrie would have gotten a 1st at the TDL.
I'm not sure why these 2 players are being compared other than that they both profile(d) as an Offensive Defenseman.
4-5 years ago, there's a really good chance that Barrie would have gotten a 1st at the TDL.
I'm not sure why these 2 players are being compared other than that they both profile(d) as an Offensive Defenseman.
dude Barrie started to fall off when he was 27 and got traded from Colorado, also Barrie has averaged like 65% ozone starts throughout his career, he's been playing easy minutes throughout his career
his coaches never put him in tough situations (PK etc), there's a reason for that, completely different than Matheson
Mathson:
Barrie:
his coaches never put him in tough situations (PK etc), there's a reason for that, completely different than Matheson
Mathson:
Barrie:
Last edited:
Barrie was the most valuable piece in the Ekholm trade. Shafer was a 1st round pick technically but would have been a 2nd rounder pre Kraken days. Also a team trading a prospect could be a red flag the kid is not developing properly.
The 1st rounder is a late one. Those are overvalued around here. Not a high chance the pick becomes an NHLer. So basically Barrie was the most important piece in the trade.
If I remembered his cap hit was 5.5M vs 4.5M for Matheson
ElPrimeTime
Registered User
Barrie was also $4.5M. I don't believe Barrie was the most valuable piece from Nashville's perspective, but used to balance out contracts.
But regardless of that trade, my point still remains that 60 point offensive d-men, who struggle in their defensive zone are not guaranteed to net 1st round picks + or else Nashville would have one and Barrie would be somewhere else.
- Oct 10, 2007
- 25,767
- 13,738
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Depends how desperate you are for a powerplay specialist that will probably hurt your 5v5 play unless sheltered. Detroit, and then St. Louis paid a 2nd for Leddy. Carolina paid a 3rd for Gostisbehere.
KingPuckChoo
Go kinGs Go !
- Jun 24, 2007
- 10,073
- 3,957
Guys, if you watch him on the Tavares PPG ... if you're a contending team, this isn't your guy
If you can find the entire PP video, watch how lost this guy is
**specifically vs how Knies is positioned next to the goalie nearly the whole time and Matheson thought that would be just fine
If you can find the entire PP video, watch how lost this guy is
**specifically vs how Knies is positioned next to the goalie nearly the whole time and Matheson thought that would be just fine
HuGort
Registered User
Chiarot type return. Matheson is 62 points on bad team
I can’t help but think the type of destruction that could possibly happen if you ran a Matheson-Myers pairing lol.
Matheson would still be our 2nd best LHD lmao.
Matheson would still be our 2nd best LHD lmao.
qc14
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2024
- 218
- 375
Feel like Matheson is the exact kind of guy that even amongst NHL GMs and pro scouts there's wildly differing opinions. The big problem for MTL is I just don't see the fit anywhere. What contender 1) needs an offensive 2LD 2) can fit in the contract for a second year in-season and 3) is willing to give up a 1st+?
I feel like MIN is probably the closest to hitting all 3? Cap and futures to play with, competing but also Matheson would be a clear upgrade to their group. FLA maybe if they can accrue enough space at the deadline? Probably the best on-ice fit but would almost certainly prevent them from bringing Ekblad back though.
I feel like MIN is probably the closest to hitting all 3? Cap and futures to play with, competing but also Matheson would be a clear upgrade to their group. FLA maybe if they can accrue enough space at the deadline? Probably the best on-ice fit but would almost certainly prevent them from bringing Ekblad back though.
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Minnesota makes sense fit wise, the contract length coincides with Kaprizov's next contract and bridges them into Buium. Also they are the one of the only teams that doesn't have a blue line threat like Matheson on the powerplay. Lastly, with their D depth they should be able to cover most of his defensive woes and give him favorable minutes. I don't see them offering a 1st though unless there is significant retention. The main problem for the Wild is Faber and Middleton's extensions are eating ~10M of the 13M coming off the buyouts next summer and Rossi is going to get a big raise too. Assuming the cap goes up about 5M again that leaves 7M to work with if no cap is going back the other way.
I can't see Florida having much interest. Shipping out Matheson was the very first thing Zito did when he took the helm in Florida. So unless Montreal is just giving him away it is very unlikely he returns there.
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Belongs on a team that has studs on the back end and is looking to add puck moving and offense. A great #3 or 4 guy but in the right top 4D mix.
Teams trading 1st rounders is circumstantial most times. Habs need the right team that he fits. If not available, it’s player/player or 2nd rounder plus grade B+ types
Teams trading 1st rounders is circumstantial most times. Habs need the right team that he fits. If not available, it’s player/player or 2nd rounder plus grade B+ types
Thechozen1
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2021
- 2,730
- 3,937
I like his puck moving and offensive ability, but his ability to defend scares me. I know plus/minus is not a tell all stat, but -24 last year negates roughly 1/3 of the offense he brought and -9 with 10 points this year.
- Oct 23, 2014
- 29,808
- 42,179
This guy has very minimal value @ 4.87 and the extra year, imo.
This is someone you wanna hide against top players and high leverage Dzone situations.
I am very skeptical that he is viewed as an impactful Top4 dman who would push other players down in the lineup by any other NHL teams. I think teams would view him as a depth addition playing down in the lineup.
This is someone you wanna hide against top players and high leverage Dzone situations.
I am very skeptical that he is viewed as an impactful Top4 dman who would push other players down in the lineup by any other NHL teams. I think teams would view him as a depth addition playing down in the lineup.
The Gr8 Dane
L'harceleur
I think he would be moved if he held good value with Hughes track history , that said maybe our management aren't trying to move him at all , much to the chagrin of the fanbase
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Pre-Game Talk: GAME 18 8:08 PM - @ DALLAS - NESN, ESPN+, 98.5 WBZ-FM- Latest: EverettMike
-
