Value of: May I ask what would be the ask for Askarov?

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,348
5,398
He was available at the draft for a top 4, franchise changing pick.
Doesn't mean we are shopping him now.
But if we are shopping him the price would be a young(23 or less) 1C which is what Trotz was trying to trade him for at the draft.
he was rumored to be shopped in a package for a top 5 pick. hes not untouchable. trotz has different ideas than the previous front office.
 

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
41,460
21,846
They won’t trade him now but they really need to make a decision next summer.

Or they’ll end up ruining either Saros or Askarovs value
 

herzausstein

Registered User
Aug 31, 2014
7,838
5,699
West Virginia
Was available at the draft (along with some 1st) while there was a "dynamic center prospect" on the board. Gives you an idea of the target. Basically, unless we can get that either 1 for 1 or even Nashville needing to add then the answer is likely just "no".

 

Moose Head

Registered User
Mar 12, 2002
5,167
2,460
Toronto
Visit site
Recall a rumour that the Preds offered him and the 15th overall for the 5th overall. Not sure if the rumour had legs though and just speculation based on the Preds trying to get into the top 5.
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,132
4,940
Well, apparently the price three months ago was to move up to a Top 5 pick from 15.

... But the Top 5 this draft was essentially viewed as a Top 3 or Top 2 in most drafts soooo, who knows?
 

FriendlyGhost92

Registered User
Jun 22, 2023
4,132
4,940
Recall a rumour that the Preds offered him and the 15th overall for the 5th overall. Not sure if the rumour had legs though and just speculation based on the Preds trying to get into the top 5.

I'm not low on Reinbacher, but if that specific trade rumor is true, holy f*** are the Habs dumb. There was plenty of good talent left at #15 with a non-Askarov like gap between them and Reinbacher.

I kinda question the validity though, considering Trotz specifically said they wanted a center. Bedard/Carlsson/Fantilli/Smith were all gone by then. Unless it was contingent that one of them was still there.
 

StewieP19

Registered User
Dec 13, 2022
370
161
All depend which team want to acquire him.
By example if team is San Jose it start with 2024 1st round pick unprotected
if team is Tampa Bay it start with Sergachev
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Groo

Armourboy

Hey! You suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,616
12,299
Shelbyville, TN
Basically he would only be available for a package that included a young #1 center, or the same level Dman ( second part is more my opinion than fact ). Truth is no one will give it up so might as well just say he isn't really available atm.
 

herzausstein

Registered User
Aug 31, 2014
7,838
5,699
West Virginia
I'm not low on Reinbacher, but if that specific trade rumor is true, holy f*** are the Habs dumb. There was plenty of good talent left at #15 with a non-Askarov like gap between them and Reinbacher.

I kinda question the validity though, considering Trotz specifically said they wanted a center. Bedard/Carlsson/Fantilli/Smith were all gone by then. Unless it was contingent that one of them was still there.
From trotz's comment of looking at getting a dynamic center, once smith was picked at 4th overall there was no chance of the trade being completed anyways.
 

Diaspora

Registered User
Jul 13, 2020
1,549
1,535
would help to know what team OP's proposal is specifically referencing

IMO it would take a prospect or young player under 25 with term and potential #1 center upside

So like :
Shane Wright
Shane Pinto+ Prospect or another roster player
Nate Danielson
Jiri Kulich
Anton Wahlberg
Matt Savoie
Peyton Krebs
Quinton Byfield
If I thought Peyton Krebs would net Askarov one-for-one, I'd do it. And I really like Krebs.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,060
10,771
Somebody tried a little too hard on the ask...
 

Buck Naked

Can't-Stand-Ya
Aug 18, 2016
3,943
6,079
would help to know what team OP's proposal is specifically referencing

IMO it would take a prospect or young player under 25 with term and potential #1 center upside

So like :
Shane Wright
Shane Pinto+ Prospect or another roster player
Nate Danielson
Jiri Kulich
Anton Wahlberg
Matt Savoie
Peyton Krebs

Quinton Byfield

Buffalo sitting on potential #1 centers like they're Oprah!
 

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,036
12,466
would help to know what team OP's proposal is specifically referencing

IMO it would take a prospect or young player under 25 with term and potential #1 center upside

So like :
Shane Wright
Shane Pinto+ Prospect or another roster player
Nate Danielson
Jiri Kulich
Anton Wahlberg
Matt Savoie
Peyton Krebs
Quinton Byfield
I don't think anybody on this list is in the range of what the Preds are looking for. Those are some good players, but if they pan out they are most likely to be just "more of the same" of what the Preds have now and have historically always had... somewhat "sub-par" band-aids for the #1C spot... as opposed to the "true #1C" that Trotz is looking for. Several of those players will become wingers. It would take a MORE significant prospect/pick than these guys. Which again comes back around to saying that effectively "Askarov is not available". Because nobody should pay that much for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armourboy and Viqsi

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,781
27,844
East Coast
Preds price today is not likely to be much different in 1 or 2 years time. They will hold his trade value today in terms of him projecting into a solid #1.

Personally, I'm not a fan of overpaying for young goalies who have not played full NHL seasons. Even if they have future potential like Askarov.
 

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,036
12,466
i think nashville included an additional 1st but im not sure
Nobody knows any of the particulars, so how could you be "sure"? All we have is what some fans wanted and what some other fans would have been willing to give up, so that doesn't say anything at all. I suspect Trotz didn't even get close enough to haggle over such details. No team in this year's draft was even remotely interested in moving their pick, so it was all moot. Trotz was shut down on the basic premise, there was no opportunity for him to get to additional details like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armourboy and Viqsi

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,664
35,260
40N 83W (approx)
Cole Sillinger for Askarov
Not sufficient for the Preds.

Speaking as a Jackets and Preds fan, let me put it this way - the Jackets were one of the teams that could have hypothetically picked up Askarov when he was potentially available, and might normally have been highly motivated to do so given the goaltending situation (what with Elvis falling apart and Tarasov being frequently injured), but it wasn't going to happen because up here we're entirely too attached to the idea of having Adam Fantilli in union blue. Trotz wanted the sun and the moon and the (future) stars.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad