Player Discussion Matt Rempe - See Mod Note Post 769

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,602
2,662
he did okay against Reaves, he was clearly more defensive which he really needed to be. it was a good tilt. Reaves is strong as a f***ing ox.

he led the team in xGF rel again lmao
Rempe really isnt a bad hockey player. Hes just a solid 4th liner. I watch alot of pack games and he was a real net front presence and hit everything that moved. I think hes gonna be a fan favorite staple on our 4th line for a while
 

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,748
5,925
Didn't leave his skates, that's true. I can't fault the kid for being tall. That pic there does no justice though as the primary contact point is the head and the player was injured. If the DoPS had any consistency, it'd be 1-2 games as a first time offender. Since they are anything BUT consistent, it'll be a slap on the wrist and maybe a fine. If anything at all tbh.
Making contact with the head isn’t the issue. TARGETING the head is. Just read the actual rules. Rempe, throwing hits, does not target the head. There will be no disciplinary action, nor should there be.
 

HolyHagelin

Speed? I am speed.
Jan 8, 2024
864
1,278
Didn't leave his skates, that's true. I can't fault the kid for being tall. That pic there does no justice though as the primary contact point is the head and the player was injured. If the DoPS had any consistency, it'd be 1-2 games as a first time offender. Since they are anything BUT consistent, it'll be a slap on the wrist and maybe a fine. If anything at all tbh.
There was no head contact. This is simply untrue.

he only has to play 25 games. after that he can remove his visor.
He has to play 25 games 11 years ago.
 

egelband

Registered User
Sep 6, 2008
16,074
14,840
i think I’d argue that Reaves me-first obsession with his own status nearly cost his leafs the game and gave the rangers a point. Objectively the leafs did not want a sideshow at that point. But reavo wouldn’t be denied his moment.
Not to say the tail never wags the dog at MSG either, but either way, yesterday’s game had no need for a staged fight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tob

Toronto makebeleifs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
1,994
707
Making contact with the head isn’t the issue. TARGETING the head is. Just read the actual rules. Rempe, throwing hits, does not target the head. There will be no disciplinary action, nor should there be.
Targeting would be interpretation from whoever views the footage. So it might or might not, honestly. You are right on the NHL version of the rules though, I wrongly assumed the NHL had adopted international rules for head contact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bhamill

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,009
40,722
he only has to play 25 games. after that he can remove his visor.

No. Players who entered the league after the rule was grandfathered in cannot remove their visor, ever. It's similar to the 1979-helmet rule. Visors are mandatory for anyone who entered the league after the implementation of 2013-14.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tlk

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,071
60,477
The Rempire State
he takes maybe one stride two many I think
Yea charging is defined as 3+ strides, he took exactly 3. It just looks worse because he’s so big and fast that his 3 strides cover so much distance lol. Then same with his size making hits higher and harder. 2 min penalty at most, fine hit. He’s just the next evolution of man, a player like the game has never seen before
 
  • Like
Reactions: cheech70

HolyHagelin

Speed? I am speed.
Jan 8, 2024
864
1,278
he takes maybe one stride two many I think
Why does everyone keep saying this? Charging does not have a number of strides assigned to it. It is a nonsensical statement in relation to the rule. Charging is not defined clearly at all, and is quite discretionary.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4433.jpeg
    IMG_4433.jpeg
    240.1 KB · Views: 4

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,071
60,477
The Rempire State
Why does everyone keep saying this? Charging does not have a number of strides assigned to it. It is a nonsensical statement in relation to the rule. Charging is not defined clearly at all, and is quite discretionary.
Is that the NHL rulebook? Perhaps the NHL leaves it more up for discretion than other governing bodies, USA Hockey & Hockey Canada both have a number of strides
 

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,071
60,477
The Rempire State
I posted the nhl rule with my post did it not show up? It is there for me.
Yes but I was just asking if that was the NHL rulebook as it didn’t specify which rulebook it was lol. Both USA hockey & hockey Canada have a set number of strides that defines charging, so I guess the NHL does leave it up for discretion but the training those refs had and if they reffed lower levels they have been accustomed to judge by a certain amount of strides but the NHL leaves it more open for discretion. Even if not explicitly stated in the NHL rulebook the number of strides does matter if a guy took 1 stride no one would call it charging, if a guy took 7 it obviously is
 

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,748
5,925
Yea charging is defined as 3+ strides, he took exactly 3. It just looks worse because he’s so big and fast that his 3 strides cover so much distance lol. Then same with his size making hits higher and harder. 2 min penalty at most, fine hit. He’s just the next evolution of man, a player like the game has never seen before
Yeah but he didn’t take any strides INTO the player. He glided the last 6 feet. You can take a thousand steps before you hit the guy as long as you glide into the guy. I guess you can say he borderline had too short a glide? I think it just looks a little that way because he’s so big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,071
60,477
The Rempire State
Yeah but he didn’t take any strides INTO the player. He glided the last 6 feet. You can take a thousand steps before you hit the guy as long as you glide into the guy. I guess you can say he borderline had too short a glide? I think it just looks a little that way because he’s so big.
Yea and Rempe was also F1 on that forecheck, that was his guy. It’s not like when there are two guys battling for a puck and some guy charges in and hits one
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,246
10,983
Rempe really isnt a bad hockey player. Hes just a solid 4th liner. I watch alot of pack games and he was a real net front presence and hit everything that moved. I think hes gonna be a fan favorite staple on our 4th line for a while
I hope so. It's limited viewing at the NHL level. His puck handling ability has been pretty sloppy and he'll need to be more aware of who is on the ice with him. Forechecking Nylander on Saturday was a predictable outcome. Personally, I'd be shocked if he plays in more than 40% of the games over the next 2 years, but I hope I'm wrong because a player that size, hitting everything, can really benefit the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yrrebbor

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad