Knight
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2010
- 320
- 668
He didHe didn’t have that puck on his stick the whole time did he?
He didHe didn’t have that puck on his stick the whole time did he?
wait til he puts a bit of meat on those bones, he doesn`t play with a snarl but he`ll be able to muscle off people, he`s a bit light right nowI just picked up up off the waiver wire in Fantasy hockey. I don't even care.
This kid is gonna be goooooood.
Yeah, I have Ekblad and Chabot on my IR so it opened a spot for a bit of a gamble, so I picked Lo-Rider up this morning, haha.wait til he puts a bit of meat on those bones, he doesn`t play with a snarl but he`ll be able to muscle off people, he`s a bit light right now
His game reminds me of Chabot.Yeah, I have Ekblad and Chabot on my IR so it opened a spot for a bit of a gamble, so I picked Lo-Rider up this morning, haha.
What are likely/realistic moves to make room for Lohrei?Great game. Great camp. He looks amazingly good. It's time to make room for him.
Please trade Gryzlyk and Ullmark for a stud forward. Swaymans the best goalie in the NHL and both have value. I want Jesper Bratt add in JDB and that should make the Devils happy.What are likely/realistic moves to make room for Lohrei?
Well, they could keep him as the 7th D and send down all the spares to make it work. There will probably be injuries and illnesses that keep a spot open in the playing lineup for both Lohrei (who needs to play) and Grzelcyk (who I don't want to scratch because it would hurt his trade value). They could maybe keep everyone for playoff depth, but I would think adding an every day player, if you can do it, would be more valuable than injury insurance.What are likely/realistic moves to make room for Lohrei?
Thanks Bill. A trade for Grzelcyk seems like the logical move to make room for Lohrei but could take some time, as you note. Keeping Lohrei by sending the spares down could work in the short term.Well, they could keep him as the 7th D and send down all the spares to make it work. There will probably be injuries and illnesses that keep a spot open in the playing lineup for both Lohrei (who needs to play) and Grzelcyk (who I don't want to scratch because it would hurt his trade value). They could maybe keep everyone for playoff depth, but I would think adding an every day player, if you can do it, would be more valuable than injury insurance.
In terms of a trade, all signs point to Grzelcyk. He's a UFA at the end of the year. Lohrei has a similar skillset. Monty scratched him when he had Orlov and Sweeney told him he'd be traded this summer.
If it were up to me, I'd try to move Gryz as soon as possible so I could bank cap space for the deadline, but that's easier said than done. Only 8 teams have the cap space to add Gryz without sending money back, and they're unlikely to get a good asset for him if they're not taking money back. If they have to wait until the deadline I could see him being worth a 2nd. More teams will be able to afford him and defensemen have a lot of value at the deadline. They probably won't clear enough cap to add a top6 player in that deal alone, but maybe they can make something work around a pending UFA if the other team retains the difference between Gryz and the incoming player.
His game reminds me of Chabot.
Some sick Mits
I'm thinking more Dougie Hamilton. Carbon CopyHis game reminds me of Chabot.
In terms of a trade, all signs point to Grzelcyk. He's a UFA at the end of the year. Lohrei has a similar skillset. Monty scratched him when he had Orlov and Sweeney told him he'd be traded this summer.
That is somewhat rediculous
I'm thinking more Dougie Hamilton. Carbon Copy
I agree that trading Gryz does make some sense since he's a UFA, but I don't think Lohrei, and Gryz have similar play styles.
Gryz is a stay at home defenseman with good puck moving ability, while Lohrei is an offensive rover more like McAvoy, that's why Gryz is always defending odd man rushes when Mac gets caught up ice.
If you put Lohrei, and Mac together, Mac would have to switch to a more responsible defensive game which would hurt the offense he could provide. With Gryz, he can be a rover.
Orlov was suppossed to a very good defenseman, but was a disaster defensively, especially with McAvoy. It's one of the reasons the Bruins lost.
Gryz has also proven that he's quite good at PKing this season now that he's been given a chance, so that makes Forbert's one strength less important.
I probably wouldn't look to trade any of the D-men unless there is a future young #1 center available at the trade deadline since injuries are bound to happen.
I'd go
Gryz-Mac
Lohrei -Carlo
Lindholm-Shattenkick
Forbert
Give them all about equal minutes 5-on-5.
Gryz-Mac, and Lindholm-Carlo on PK, and Mac, Lohrei, Lindholme, and Shattenkirk with PP time
I like Gryz but IMO, Lohrei makes him expendable. The NHL's 82-game season is a dog fight and you keep Forbort around for the PK and playoffs. I would think that Gryz helps them fetch a low 2nd / high 3rd round pick.What are likely/realistic moves to make room for Lohrei?
So we set aside that Forbort has been terrible in the playoffs?I like Gryz but IMO, Lohrei makes him expendable. The NHL's 82-game season is a dog fight and you keep Forbort around for the PK and playoffs. I would think that Gryz helps them fetch a low 2nd / high 3rd round pick.
Past performance is not always an indicator of what you will get going forward in the playoffs with a Forbort. If it were, why bother even keeping Ullmark. They've been winning games this season with solid D, goaltending and very importantly, the PK, so I'd keep him over Gryz.So we set aside that Forbort has been terrible in the playoffs?
We can afford to have Grizz/Forbort as 7D. Why weaken the team this year?