I think it's fine, but I definitely don't love it as much as most.
I'm always in the minority, and always right, so no worry. It sucked.
www.superherohype.com
You can see ridiculous that would be!Well it just follows the comics....The choice of Shuri as the Black Panther was very underwhelming and one of several things wrong with that movie. The actress playing is not charismatic and has no physical presence whatsoever as she looks like she is 105 lbs. Not only that, but she is the nerdy scientist - how is that an appropriate replacement for the original Black Panther?! It would be like if James Bond died and M16 decided to promote Q (the one who creates all the interesting gadgets for Bond) as the new 007.
As a kid I used to watch the original Smokey and the Bandit and Smokey and the Bandit 2 on tv on a regular basis. The first movie was a massive blockbuster hit and the second one was a fairly big hit as well although an essentially regurgitated plot from the first one, only this time featuring an elephant. Both movies featured Burt Reynolds, one of the biggest and coolest movie stars of the time. Burt decided not to come back for the third movie, so they decided to promote his sidekick from the previous movies "The Snowman" to the role of the bandit. He even says "I get to be the bandit!" in the movie.
Predictably, the movie bombed as the actor did not have the charisma or star power of Burt. Rest assured, if Kevin Feige and Disney decide to create a solo Black Panther movie in the Marvel Universe with Shuri as the Black Panther, it will suffer the same fate and will be a commercial failure.
So let me guess. You are one of those people who thinks if it was in the comic, it must be good!
Are you one of those people who thinks everything in the source material is shit?
No, but there is plenty of comic book material that is of questionable quality. There are also cases in which the source material may be just not be suitable to on-screen adaptation regardless of the director or actors. There are also cases in which the source material may not be suitable to an on-screen adaptation if the actors are not suited for it ie) not bankable or not actually good actors.
So let me guess you are one of those hipsters that likes to crap on everything?
not a bad list, to me they all had good moments but some didn't have enough of them. Also think in some cases scenes that were deleted would have made some of them better or added more to the story. Like for Thor, the scene that Zeus explains the thunderbolt and power to Thor. Harkens back to when his own dad was trying to teach him about his powers not being a hammer but part of him etc.
