Player Discussion Marner

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
76,238
42,604
It’s not the 10 games. It’s the 8 seasons (going on 9). He is the only one that has failed every playoffs. every playoffs. And he is about to get a pay raise, when he isnt living up to his contract now.
He can’t change the narrative of the past playoffs during this regular season. I don’t see the point of the daily weeping about something that may happen again in 6 months. Seems like a miserable way to spend a season.
He played great the past few games, why not discuss that?
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,030
24,401
Here it is:

Is Mitch Marner The Most Overrated Player in the NHL?

His conclusion was yes 5v5 Marner is.


That was interesting, thanks!

Cliff notes for those who can't be bothered to watch (which you should consider, it's not very long):
Marner is a very good player, but only 4th best at creating scoring chances on his own team. This was I believe from 2019 when Matthews ranked 3rd in this category league wide, JT was tied for 12th, Nylander was 22nd and Marner was 26th. Still very good, but nowhere near as good as people think.

This no doubt comes as a surprise to many people but there it is. His fans say JT scored all those goals because of Marner but JT actually created more chances than Marner, but unlike Marner he's also able to convert those chances. So not only are Marner's linemates making him look good by converting chances at an elite rate, Marner's also making them look worse as playmakers because he's not very good at converting scoring chances into goals.

Would be interesting to see yearly stats in this category but I doubt much has changed.
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,372
17,779
That was interesting, thanks!

Cliff notes for those who can't be bothered to watch (which you should consider, it's not very long):
Marner is a very good player, but only 4th best at creating scoring chances on his own team. This was I believe from 2019 when Matthews ranked 3rd in this category league wide, JT was tied for 12th, Nylander was 22nd and Marner was 26th. Still very good, but nowhere near as good as people think.

This no doubt comes as a surprise to many people but there it is. His fans say JT scored all those goals because of Marner but JT actually created more chances than Marner, but unlike Marner he's also able to convert those chances. So not only are Marner's linemates making him look good by converting chances at an elite rate, Marner's also making them look worse as playmakers because he's not very good at converting scoring chances into goals.

Would be interesting to see yearly stats in this category but I doubt much has changed.

Why would you take anything Andrew Berkshire says seriously? He’s a known leafs hater. And tries to shit on them any chance he gets. No one in the media messes with him and he’s been completely blacklisted. After he was let go by SDPN, he went on a senseless rant and basically no one in the media talks to or takes anything he says seriously anymore.

Guy is a tool and not credible.
 

Niagara Bill

Registered User
Oct 11, 2021
1,908
1,395
Of course there's a limit. I wouldn't pay him max. But there's no reason to think that it's going to take anything close to max.

Nothing is twisted. You can easily verify the data yourself. Those stretches of season-playoff production discrepancies aren't as abnormal as you want them to be, and they happen to all sorts of players. It doesn't mean what you want it to.

Marner isn't any of those. Marner is the Backstrom, who was kept. The Bergeron, who was kept. The Barkov, who was kept.

Both parties would not agree to that. It's not realistic. I'm talking about realistic alternatives before we throw away one of the best players this franchise has ever seen.

It's not though. People overrate what cap space actually gets you.
You are becoming a joke, people over rate cap space.....hahaha
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafSteel

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,030
24,401
Why would you take anything Andrew Berkshire says seriously? He’s a known leafs hater. And tries to shit on them any chance he gets. No one in the media messes with him and he’s been completely blacklisted. After he was let go by SDPN, he went on a senseless rant and basically no one in the media talks to or takes anything he says seriously anymore.

Guy is a tool and not credible.
Not sure where you're getting this from. What do you mean by "completely blacklisted"?
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,372
17,779
Not sure where you're getting this from. What do you mean by "completely blacklisted"?

Show me anything Andrew Berkshire has done in the media since Covid. He hasn’t. He can’t find a job. I forgot exactly what he said on Twitter but he had to issue a huge apology and basically hasn’t been working in hockey media since. No longer appears on Sportsnet or anything like that either.

Not sure where you're getting this from. What do you mean by "completely blacklisted"?

Aha I actually remember it was he made some comments about Zach Hyman never having to work hard in his life and everything was given to him. And how his dad bought his NHL career. Something along those lines. And that’s what I mean. Any former leaf Berkshire will say the dumbest shit just for clicks. Hyman was on the oilers
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,030
24,401
Show me anything Andrew Berkshire has done in the media since Covid. He hasn’t. He can’t find a job. I forgot exactly what he said on Twitter but he had to issue a huge apology and basically hasn’t been working in hockey media since. No longer appears on Sportsnet or anything like that either.

Aha I actually remember it was he made some comments about Zach Hyman never having to work hard in his life and everything was given to him. And how his dad bought his NHL career. Something along those lines. And that’s what I mean. Any former leaf Berkshire will say the dumbest shit just for clicks. Hyman was on the oilers
I don't pay much attention to sports media so I can't to show you anything. I watched the video that was shared and what he said seemed to make sense, that's the end of it.

A quick google search shows that this Hyman stuff happened in the spring, I don't see that he apologized, rather provided some clarification on what he said.

Re. the bolded - not sure what you mean by "any former leaf Berkshire"??
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,372
17,779
I don't pay much attention to sports media so I can't to show you anything. I watched the video that was shared and what he said seemed to make sense, that's the end of it.

A quick google search shows that this Hyman stuff happened in the spring, I don't see that he apologized, rather provided some clarification on what he said.

Re. the bolded - not sure what you mean by "any former leaf Berkshire"??

Meant to say, any former/current leaf he’s had wild takes on. Same things he’s said about Mitch, he’s said about Matthews. Point being, he has not worked with Sportsnet in about 4 years and was not picked up by any other major network or even online web based subscription. Hasn’t been hired by an NHL team or even AHL team and he’s supposed to be an analytics guy. He’s not really credible. Usually those types of guys get hired pretty quickly by online writing platforms.

Even Julian MacKenzie is getting jobs with the athletic haha. Berkshire is doing his own thing now and hopefully it takes off but he’s just got some awful takes.
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,030
24,401
Meant to say, any former/current leaf he’s had wild takes on. Same things he’s said about Mitch, he’s said about Matthews. Point being, he has not worked with Sportsnet in about 4 years and was not picked up by any other major network or even online web based subscription. Hasn’t been hired by an NHL team or even AHL team and he’s supposed to be an analytics guy. He’s not really credible. Usually those types of guys get hired pretty quickly by online writing platforms.

Even Julian MacKenzie is getting jobs with the athletic haha. Berkshire is doing his own thing now and hopefully it takes off but he’s just got some awful takes.
What he said about Marner made sense to me. If it doesn't to you then that's fine but I'm not going to dismiss something that seems to make sense because of nothing more than who wrote it. I don't know dick about who the media guys are so I pay no attention to who's saying what. If someone shares something that seems interesting I will take a look at and decide for myself if it makes sense or not. Hell even Simmonds is right every now and then despite the fact that he spews a lot of nonsense.
 

Antropovsky

Registered User
Jun 2, 2007
15,213
6,910
Stumbled on this article today, from last season regarding Marners "empty calorie points":

Mitch Marner is scoring, but is there enough substance to his game this season?




"His playmaking while inside the zone has also taken a hit this season, with fewer shot and scoring-chance assists.

Not only are the Leafs creating less in Marner’s minutes compared to previous seasons, but it’s also relative to his teammates this season. He’s rarely had a negative influence on his team’s expected goal creation, but this year it’s down to minus-0.17 per 60.

Marner’s impact, relative to the average skater when accounting for his role, usage, and coaching, is still slightly above average as the heat maps reflect below
(the top row is offense/bottom row defense, with red showing areas of more expected goal generation). But he’s someone the Leafs count on to be more than slightly above average — he’s expected to be a game-breaker, along with Nylander and Matthews.

The production may have masked some of the flaws developing below the surface, but Marner needs to bring more than just empty-calorie scoring. "


More "interesting" info in bold below from the article:


With a win in the books, it’s easy to chalk it up as a fine game for Marner. But that’s part of the problem this season: He’s had a bunch of fine games. Or games that seem fine on the scoresheet, but lack substance to back up that performance. Toronto needs him to be great more often than not — especially as the pressure rises in the second half of the season.
If Marner at least matches his current scoring pace, he will finish the year in the 90-point range for the third straight season. Even if he ends the year a shade off of his totals from the last two seasons, there isn’t a real reason to wave a red flag just yet — until you start digging past that surface level.


With a scoring pace of 3.16 points per 60, Marner stood at 31st in the league and third on the Leafs heading into Thursday night
If that was where Marner’s dips stopped, there wouldn’t be much of a conversation. But someone of his caliber is expected to dominate his minutes, and that hasn’t been the case through much of the season. And that’s a key reason why his average Game Score has dropped from 1.37 last year to 1.10 through 42 games. In just under half of Marner’s games this year, his overall game hasn’t matched up to his play on the scoresheet — and his five-on-five play has a lot to do with it.
Ahead of Thursday’s matchup against the Flames, Toronto had outscored opponents 34-25 in Marner’s minutes, for just under 58 percent of the goals share. The winger has had a hand in tilting the scoring in his minutes, with a point on 80 percent of the goals he’s been on the ice for. But that scoring doesn’t quite line up with the shot quality being created on both ends.


Toronto is just breaking even, with 50.3 percent of the expected goals share when Marner is deployed. That is uncharacteristically low for a player who tends to have a hand in creating a lot of quality offense in his minutes and limiting opponents back in his own zone. The Maple Leafs have only been out-chanced in one season with Marner on the ice: his rookie year in 2016-17, when the team only mustered 49.6 percent of the expected goals.

Marner is firing the puck more often at five-on-five, and he has the results to show for it, with an increased goals rate than most seasons. But there isn’t as much oomph below the surface to support that pace. A higher percentage of his shot attempts are getting blocked or missing the net; only 62.3 percent are even going on goal,


Marner’s elevated shooting percentage of 17.3 also raises some sustainability concerns. If his shots were getting set up by high-danger chances more often than in years past, it might explain why he’s converting more this season. But that’s not the case.

Marner is bringing the puck into the offensive zone less, and that’s subsequently led to fewer scoring chances for the Leafs in transition. His playmaking while inside the zone has also taken a hit this season, with fewer shot and scoring-chance assists.


Not only are the Leafs creating less in Marner’s minutes compared to previous seasons, but it’s also relative to his teammates this season. He’s rarely had a negative influence on his team’s expected goal creation, but this year it’s down to minus-0.17 per 60.

Marner’s impact, relative to the average skater when accounting for his role, usage, and coaching, is still slightly above average as the heat maps reflect below (the top row is offense/bottom row defense, with red showing areas of more expected goal generation). But he’s someone the Leafs count on to be more than slightly above average — he’s expected to be a game-breaker, along with Nylander and Matthews.

It won’t get any easier for Toronto in the second half, with one of the more difficult schedules ahead. And that’s going to put even more responsibility on all four components of the Core Four to perform up to the high expectations they’ve set for themselves. The production may have masked some of the flaws developing below the surface, but Marner needs to bring more than just empty-calorie scoring.
 
Last edited:

thusk

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
4,400
2,265
Chicoutimi
Look at the goal production. It's all from L2. Very glad Marner is racking those secondary assists though. Really making bank off touches and mentions. -1 still.

L1 should be leading the charge. JT and WN have no business being ahead of MM or AM but here we are

Nylander this season had been real (and like his entire carreer) rollercoaster, 1 game he could fly on the ice and be the best player and the next game game completly invisible with basically no impact to the game.

Nylander had 4 amaizing game
Like 5 pretty trash game
and 1 okay game


When he's hot, he's extremely hot but when he's cold, he's incredibly cold vs Marner had been the most constant leafs player this season.

Who do you think coach like Berube will prefer the most to build a team identity, the constant player or the polarized one you never saw wich version you gonna get?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,030
24,401
Who do you think coach like Berube will prefer the most to build a team identity, the constant player or the polarized one you never saw wich version you gonna get?
Strange question. A more relevant question would be - who can you count on to show up in the playoffs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafSteel

Gabriel426

Registered User
Jun 30, 2015
18,064
11,706
Cap space is only valuable if it’s utilized properly. The issue is that most GM’s overspend in UFA and don’t utilize cap space to take advantage of trades with cap space.
Depends who is available.

Sometime there are just no players available. Sometimes, there are quite a few. For example, I think this past offseason had a lot of very good but not great players available for the right price.

Nylander this season had been real (and like his entire carreer) rollercoaster, 1 game he could fly on the ice and be the best player and the next game game completly invisible with basically no impact to the game.

Nylander had 4 amaizing game
Like 5 pretty trash game
and 1 okay game


When he's hot, he's extremely hot but when he's cold, he's incredibly cold vs Marner had been the most constant leafs player this season.

Who do you think coach like Berube will prefer the most to build a team identity, the constant player or the polarized one you never saw wich version you gonna get?
To be fair, Willie also never had consistent line mates through 10 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

Confucius

There is no try, Just do
Feb 8, 2009
23,202
7,773
Toronto
That was interesting, thanks!

Cliff notes for those who can't be bothered to watch (which you should consider, it's not very long):
Marner is a very good player, but only 4th best at creating scoring chances on his own team. This was I believe from 2019 when Matthews ranked 3rd in this category league wide, JT was tied for 12th, Nylander was 22nd and Marner was 26th. Still very good, but nowhere near as good as people think.

This no doubt comes as a surprise to many people but there it is. His fans say JT scored all those goals because of Marner but JT actually created more chances than Marner, but unlike Marner he's also able to convert those chances. So not only are Marner's linemates making him look good by converting chances at an elite rate, Marner's also making them look worse as playmakers because he's not very good at converting scoring chances into goals.

Would be interesting to see yearly stats in this category but I doubt much has changed.
Well how is that relevant today, being 6 years later
 
  • Like
Reactions: francis246

thusk

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
4,400
2,265
Chicoutimi
Strange question. A more relevant question would be - who can you count on to show up in the playoffs?

Like i said when Nylander is hot, hes pretty hot... When hes cold hes pretty cold and its the same thing in playoff...

2024 hard to say with only 4 game played


2023 7 pts in 4 game ... disapear next 4, came back with 3 in 3

2022 didn't show up 1st 3 game of the series, next 3 been pretty hot and disapear last one...

2021 was his best was great first 4, okay gm 5 and invisible gm 6 and 7

2020 vs cbs, pretty quiet gm 1 and 2, got 2 good game 3 and 4 and disapear gm 5

When close of 50% of game you playing, you're off. Sorry whatever how great you are in the 50% you're hot... Good luck to win a serie. The game hes hot hes flying on the ice and look like leafs best player, the game iss off, bring nothing and chesting defensively... Depend wich version we got for playoff, its kibd of mistery boxes.

Nylander is extremely talented, he can take a night off open up gate for 2 min and finish with 2 pts but having an awful game overall.

Marner is less flashy but pretty constant every coach will trust whatever what

Depends who is available.

Sometime there are just no players available. Sometimes, there are quite a few. For example, I think this past offseason had a lot of very good but not great players available for the right price.


To be fair, Willie also never had consistent line mates through 10 games.

Nylander was off 1st 2 game, Berube took decision and moved him with Domi and worked for a short time. He took it off again and Berube bring him back with JT to try to get his game back. The reason why he changed line was to try to bring something from him.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: arso40

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad