ULF_55
Moderator
Why can't someone be critical of his first showing, while still not writing him off.
After watching him in the OHL the last few years, I was unimpressed with his first preseason game with the Maple Leafs. While I was unimpressed, I know it's just one game and not enough to outweigh all of the great things I have seen from him over the last two years.
He needs work. I think it's more obvious to some now than it was over the summer. Nothing wrong with that - most high end draftees don't sniff the NHL for a year or two after they are drafted. No different here.
I don't know why some people feel they need to fight battles for Marner. The kid will be fine. If he plays well the next preseason game, I'll say he played well. Will take a lot more than a couple of preseason games to get me to change my mind on him, but I also reserve the right to not get taken to task for thinking that he was unspectacular (whether expected or not) in a given game.
Also, just because someone expected him to be unspectacular in his first game, or if there were mitigating circumstances to excuse his performance (nerves etc), it does not mean that he wasn't unspectacular. It just means it's only one game, and there is lots of room for improvement.
My $0.02. Feel free to ask for a refund!
Exactly.
You don't rate the kid's game, for that game, based on what he did in junior, you base it on the game.
Most people have seen kids have great games in preseason that doesn't mean they'll be a great player. Same thing if a kid as an average or below average game that doesn't mean they'll be average or below average player (in the NHL).
I don't see any reasonable posts suggesting he is a bust.
A game performance isn't about a career.