WTFMAN99
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2009
- 34,130
- 12,263
You're cherry picking big time by assessing "ELC production" rather than actual production.
U19:
Pastrnak: 46GP 10G 27P
Nylander: Not good enough for the NHL
U20:
Pastrnak: 51GP 15G 26P 0.50 pt/game
Nylander: 22GP 6G 13P 0.59 pt/game
U21:
Pastrnak: 75GP 34G 70P
Nylander: 81GP 22G 61P with significantly less PP Time
U22:
Pastrnak: 82GP 35G 80P
Nylander: 82GP 20G 61P
In no logical way can you compare Pastrnak to Nylander. Its silly. Pastrnak has been, is, and will always be the better player. Horrible comparables.
False
Leafs chose to hold him back which delayed his arrival to the NHL, which delayed his next contract, Leafs also failed to negotiate an extension prior to it expiring. That lead to Nylander negotiating a contract against a higher salary cap then what Pastrnak negotiated against which of course results in a higher cap hit.
Leafs basically botched it by not negotiating sooner to get a more favourable cap hit like the Jets did with Ehlers. The Leafs waited until his deal expired and didn't handle the negotiations well.
U22 season, Pastrnak was already under contract, if he wasn't, he'd have been closer to 7.5-8M per season, so Pastrnak only has himself to blame.
You're literally the only person I have spoke with that doesn't understand how this all happened and are disputing David Pastrnak as a comparable for Nylander.