ManosArriba
Registered User
- Oct 24, 2017
- 207
- 112
If Marner would accept an offer sheet to play for the Rags he isnt the kind of guy I want here anyways.
Market value for such a player is firmly set with the Kucherov contract. Sure, there's tax benefits there, but the fact that 7 ufa years are signed for MORE than offsets that (as well as Kucherov is currently the far better player).
Leaf fans are more than happy to pay Marner fair market value (9.5x8). But not to dramatically overpay. If another team wants to DRAMATICALLY overpay Marner (which I highly highly doubt), we'll be more than happy with the 4 first round picks.
It is what it is.
Why would it be good for us. He had a horrible year for the most part.Won’t that be a good thing for the Leafs if that happens.
TBay pays very little taxes if any
You can't use there contracts as a measuring stick
Stevie Yzerman will find out that it is way different in Detroit
Add 25% taxes to TBay contracts
Additional 2.4 mil
Example
Stamkos contract
8.5 mil in TBay
10 mil in Canada
If his contract is low, then it is a good thing.Why would it be good for us. He had a horrible year for the most part.
Yeah....and Matthews really is 3 MM better than Stamkos.The whole "no state tax" angle is extremely exaggerated.
It's not as big a difference as you seem to suggest here.
Exactly, it would be treasonous IMHO.If Marner would accept an offer sheet to play for the Rags he isnt the kind of guy I want here anyways.
I don't think they will. Not a chance in hell.Who said they will. You have though.
I pointed all of that out.TBay pays very little taxes if any
You can't use there contracts as a measuring stick
Stevie Yzerman will find out that it is way different in Detroit
Add 25% taxes to TBay contracts
Additional 2.4 mil
Example
Stamkos contract
8.5 mil in TBay
10 mil in Canada
He will not sign an offer sheet unless the Leafs tell him they are not signing him to a contract around 10-11 per.
10.5 MM wont even yield 4 1sts on the new offersheet numbers.
When did kucherov sign his contract again? Was it after 17/18 season or mid way through that year. The gap between 18/19 marner and kucherov from 17/18 isnt that large. The gap between 18/19 kucherov and 18/19 marner is huge. Comparing marner to kuch at the time of his signing and adjusting for increase in the salary cap makes 8×9.5 be perfectly fair market value for marner and the leafs.I pointed all of that out.
Kucherov has lower taxes. But he also scored far more points than Marner. And his contract took up SEVEN ufa years. That balances out the tax benefits.
So 9.5x8 is still far ABOVE market value for Marner.
7 ufa years to 3. Still an overpayment for Marner. But I’d accept it at this point. I’m now at a point where I accept slight overpayments from Dubas. It’s better than the Dubas special of dramatically overpaying everyone.When did kucherov sign his contract again? Was it after 17/18 season or mid way through that year. The gap between 18/19 marner and kucherov from 17/18 isnt that large. The gap between 18/19 kucherov and 18/19 marner is huge. Comparing marner to kuch at the time of his signing and adjusting for increase in the salary cap makes 8×9.5 be perfectly fair market value for marner and the leafs.
Rantanen had significantly less EV points than Marner this year. Apparently this matters with Matthews but not Marner.7 ufa years to 3. Still an overpayment for Marner. But I’d accept it at this point. I’m now at a point where I accept slight overpayments from Dubas. It’s better than the Dubas special of dramatically overpaying everyone.
Rantanen has more goals and points than Marner the past two seasons (and is currently leading nhl in playoff points) and I doubt he’ll make a penny more than Kucherov.
Rantanen had significantly less EV points than Marner this year. Apparently this matters with Matthews but not Marner.
On the PP, had Marner scored at his p/60 with the amount of PP time Rantanen was given, he would have 7 more points leaving him in sole possession of the 5th overall in scoring . You might want to re-examine your conclusions.
Too bad they can't pay players by the point...imagine how hard they would try then?!
I was told in the Nylander vs Pastrnak threads that one elite season doesn’t earn a big pay day. The consistency of doing it twice made Nylander more valuable.Rantanen had significantly less EV points than Marner this year. Apparently this matters with Matthews but not Marner.
On the PP, had Marner scored at his p/60 with the amount of PP time Rantanen was given, he would have 7 more points leaving him in sole possession of the 5th overall in scoring . You might want to re-examine your conclusions.
I am not going to have a long debate with you.
Internal cap is vastly more relevant that external Comparable players.
Look at Tampa for and example you need to compare them to us. Stammer and JT then add in Matthews. Marner is going to get more money then his external comparison players.
Matthews signed for over his value based on a 5 year deal as did Nylander. It comes down to context.
Do you really think that Kucherov will score more points in the next 8 years? Marner is already 43% higher than where Kucherov was when he was the same age.When did kucherov sign his contract again? Was it after 17/18 season or mid way through that year. The gap between 18/19 marner and kucherov from 17/18 isnt that large. The gap between 18/19 kucherov and 18/19 marner is huge. Comparing marner to kuch at the time of his signing and adjusting for increase in the salary cap makes 8×9.5 be perfectly fair market value for marner and the leafs.
If assessing Rantanen vs Marner, one can't help but notice the elephant in the room. 54 pts vs 69 pointsWait, who claimed ES production isn't important with Marner? I think it's critical to assessing any player personally