This doesn't make senseIf he misses training camp I hope he understands he'll be taking less than is being offered now.
Because he'll miss out on the 2 months of pay.This doesn't make sense
You do not get paid for training camp.Because he'll miss out on the 2 months of pay.
If he misses training camp I hope he understands he'll be taking less than is being offered now.
The cap is not affected by a training camp holdoutBecause he'll miss out on the 2 months of pay.
I would certainly hope Dubas has made his best offer. Once the season starts his cap hit for the year can only be higher, therefore he has to be offered less.This doesn't make sense
I will be very disappointed if they both havent agreed to a bridge as a contingency before it gets to thatI would certainly hope Dubas has made his best offer. Once the season starts his cap hit for the year can only be higher, therefore he has to be offered less.
I believe he starts losing money after game #1 in October.
Yeah, my bad.The cap is not affected by a training camp holdout
Yeah, but that was an unacceptable compromise made by a rookie gm that doesn't know what he's doing.In all likelihood he won't, he's going to get a gigantic bonus the day he signs which means he doesn't loose money if he doesn't start the season, Nylander didn't lose bugger all even though he didn't play for 2 months
The big difference is we cant afford the big cap hit for starting the season late.In all likelihood he won't, he's going to get a gigantic bonus the day he signs which means he doesn't loose money if he doesn't start the season, Nylander didn't lose bugger all even though he didn't play for 2 months
The issue is unlike Nylander, available cap shrinks immediately on the start of the season due to LTIR. With Nylander we had space so it scaled identically with the time he was off. So delaying beyond season start will impact the money available to him.In all likelihood he won't, he's going to get a gigantic bonus the day he signs which means he doesn't loose money if he doesn't start the season, Nylander didn't lose bugger all even though he didn't play for 2 months
Yeah, but that was an unacceptable compromise made by a rookie gm that doesn't know what he's doing.
Look how Nylander performed last year. And making him "square" for sitting out two months? It's a joke.
The big difference is we cant afford the big cap hit for starting the season late.
The issue is unlike Nylander, available cap shrinks immediately on the start of the season due to LTIR. With Nylander we had space so it scaled identically with the time he was off. So delaying beyond season start will impact the money available to him.
Jesus, hyperbole much?
He was a young guy learning on the job, it would seem he's learnt some things since the Nylander situation and has had an excellent offseason, he gave Nylander bonuses, the horror
Step back from the ledge
That wasn't what was asked, it was would Marner lose money if he sits and with bonuses he wouldn't necessarily have to
Us being able to pay him a pro rated salary next season and fit it under the cap is a different issue
If he sits he's either bridged or traded and if he's bridged I would imagine he gets bonuses so won't lose any money, or gets traded or just doesn't play next season
If he signs with the leafs, delaying would only make him lose money. Trading out money wouldn't make him earn any more. To help you understand... It's $10.5 million of LTIR but because contracts signed into the season are prorated, that $10.5 million gets smaller by each passing day because unlike cap space, it doesn't scale over time. So if he signed at the same time Nylander did, Leafs could only afford around $7 million AAV. In order to make space for anything more, they'd have to trade $20+ million of cap. That's why he cannot wait any longer than the start of the season or else he's looking for an offer sheet. That basically narrows it down to... Ottawa and New Jersey.
Pretty sure he wont be traded, who out there is worth 4 1sts and the 10.5 million cap space that we can use to sign another player or 2. Saying trade him is one thing but we get quite a bit if he accepts an offer sheet.I understand, I just don't think you guys are actually thinking about this clearly, Marner is going to get his if he sits out the start of the season or not, be it us or somebody else
If anybody thinks he's taking a long term deal with a pro rated AAV that we can fit under the cap after he's sat for any length of time is out of there mind, he's either going to bridge, get traded or not play this season in that situation
Nothing else makes sense for an RFA of his quality
Pretty sure he wont be traded, who out there is worth 4 1sts and the 10.5 million cap space that we can use to sign another player or 2. Saying trade him is one thing but we get quite a bit if he accepts an offer sheet.
Simmons from the Sun said that the Leafs won't sign Marner until the beginning of the season, meaning he'll miss training camp and the first few games.
I like your positivitySo Kadri's gone...
Kawhi's gone...
Stro's gone..
Marner's next? ok.
You cite the stat regularly and then lay out that points tell you less about what is going on not more.
1. I never use expected goals for as an isolated stat, ever.
2. Every comp I have used in this thread has been built on comparing p/60 numbers for offense.
3. Yes, points are less informative than the numbers I have been using.
No they could use LTIR and have no problem.Simmons may be right that the Leafs won’t sign Marner until the end of camp. That’s when they will have the space. They can only go 10% over the cap in summer including the LTIRs, so that’s 89.65 m. On Oct 2 they can put 10.5 or more on LTIR so effectively 92.
If Mitch is getting 10+, it may have to wait until then.
I suspect they have a tentative deal in place.