I don't want to sound like a downer but who here thinks somebody is going to trade us "full value" for Marner whilst he's an unsigned RFA?
Imagine going to you owner and trying to explain how your going to give up multiple quality controlled assets for a guy you still need to sign and wants what's likely to be insane money? You'd gut your own team and be forced to sign Marner to whatever he wants on top of it
Never say never but if I was another owner or GM I wouldn't touch that situation with a 10 foot barge pole, unfortunately I think this is going to be our problem to solve for better or worse
The pessimist in me says this isn't going to be pretty
Rock solid evidence right here folks.The battle continues between Mitch Marner's camp and the Toronto Maple Leafs and according to sources, the demands from Mitch's dad, Paul Marner appear to be getting out of hand.
Sources connected to the Maple Leafs have indicated, Paul Marner wants the exact same contract for his son, as Auston Matthews received from Kyle Dubas, but that's not where it ends. Talks include Marner's Dad demanding a letter for his son's jersey, especially if the team names Auston Matthews their new captain.
The Maple Leafs have played the past few seasons without a Captain, and it's down to either John Tavares, Morgan Rielly, or Auston Matthews, however, if Mitch Marner ends up with no letter on his jersey, his Dad has made it known his son will be looking to play else where.
First William Nylander, and now Mitch Marner, it appears Leafs GM, Kyle Dubas is getting used to dealing with controlling fathers.
.....
Only valuable thing in that article, once again reference to how the Matthews contract is viewed around the league...awful!
Yup. And the large Northern markets support the smaller Southern markets and were at a disadvantage being able to sign players due to taxes. It’s not fair. Hope the big markets squash it in the next CBA. Because teams like the Leafs need to flex their muscles.
Nobody will trade for him without having a deal worked out beforehand. That's a built-in assumption.
Points don’t count only goals63 points as a career high. Go
I wish I got paid 10 million in signing bonuses to have elite zone entries and 27 points
what a life!!!
Too bad your arbitrary standards don't quite carry the weight that you seem to think. It's not about excuses, your expectations just aren't reasonableDon’t forget the most important stat
The most stick checks in the neutral zone.
One poster actually tried to justify nylander contract
The excuses are now done for nylander and Matthews
Willy has to be a 35 /35 70 point player to justify his contract and Matthews has to stay healthy and be a 55/50 105 point player.
Excuses done
They are very reasonable based on the salary they are both getting otherwise we are stuck with bad contracts.Too bad your arbitrary standards don't quite carry the weight that you seem to think. It's not about excuses, your expectations just aren't reasonable
Too bad your arbitrary standards don't quite carry the weight that you seem to think. It's not about excuses, your expectations just aren't reasonable
70 points is a generous level to give to nylander. He signed for 70 points for 6 years. He got 27 in his 1st...a 43 point deficit.Too bad your arbitrary standards don't quite carry the weight that you seem to think. It's not about excuses, your expectations just aren't reasonable
Don’t forget the most important stat
The most stick checks in the neutral zone.
One poster actually tried to justify nylander contract
The excuses are now done for nylander and Matthews
Willy has to be a 35 /35 70 point player to justify his contract and Matthews has to stay healthy and be a 55/50 105 point player.
Excuses done
70 points is a generous level to give to nylander. He signed for 70 points for 6 years. He got 27 in his 1st...a 43 point deficit.
You are jumping to conclusions here. I didn't say he should have scored 70 in his first year. I said it was generous. Basted on his signing, a fair distribution would be to prorate the deal for the first. 70 x 6 = 42 points.A pace of 41 points over 82 games. Sure, but keep the excuses flying.
I agree.So I actually heard something new I didn't know. Apparently Marner was willing to sign a discount type deal or at least make something work if need be, but wanted to be last to see if the others would do it as well. He feels Matthews didn't take a cent of a discount, so now he won't either...Which is a pretty fair way of looking at things if I put my fandom aside.
You are jumping to conclusions here. I didn't say he should have scored 70 in his first year. I said it was generous. Basted on his signing, a fair distribution would be to prorate the deal for the first. 70 x 6 = 42 points.
Weighted based on the 1st year proration, it would be distributed in a ratio that looks like 0.6,:1:1:1:1:1.
or...
45:75:75:75:75:75
He should have scored 45 points his first year and he fell short by 18. He should score 75 for the following years assuming the first year shortfall is under the bridge.
So I actually heard something new I didn't know. Apparently Marner was willing to sign a discount type deal or at least make something work if need be, but wanted to be last to see if the others would do it as well. He feels Matthews didn't take a cent of a discount, so now he won't either...Which is a pretty fair way of looking at things if I put my fandom aside.
Now, again, he still intends to play for the Leafs. I think that something is going to get done before the season starts. I think he is going to take a bridge deal or something similar to Matthews term at most money he can get. Wouldn't be surprised if he even took something like 10.16 x 6 years. Just trying to make sure he is getting the best deal possible, and won't sign until he has to.
This is if you believe what friends of friends say over a few beers lol
I would like nothing more than to see Willy crack over 70 this year . I would say that below 70 would be disappointingI was just agreeing with your general point that he fell way short of expectations and I don't particularly like the excuses being made for him.
I think Marner's contract is being delayed to take advantage of a legal loop hole. Maybe only Dubas knows
Crosby said it in his interview with spittin chicklets this summer (paraphrasing) "Taking less only works if everyone takes less"
Shanny tried to preach that and was ripped to shreds by dubas fanboys - who are still trying to justify that disaster of a nylander season and matthews' overpayment; if marner is not willing to take less when nylander and matthews got every possible cent out of the mapleleafs why should marner?
I don't blame marner if he is looking to get paid based on his production; his year over year improvement in play - especially since opposition coaches talk about how they view Marner (not a hint of nylander or matthews for that matter).
Cassidy coach that went to SCF
Cooper coach that won the presidents trophy
both are on record praising marner's hockey IQ
Cassidy:
there are plenty more from Cassidy.
Cooper:
sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/jon-cooper-mitch-marner-one-smartest-players-nhls-ever-seen/
Jon Cooper: Mitch Marner is one of smartest players NHL's ever seen
I just want a 6 year deal from Marner so that he is looking for the new contract the same time JT is off the books and we can re-sign him long term.
He didn't, it just turned out that way.Marner should NOT have insisted on negotiating last. Whoever game him that advice, needs to be fired.