There still seems to be a lot of people who don't understand how good Matthews and Marner are.
I'll even split it up for people who think rookie years shouldn't be included:
ES P/GP at time of signing, all ELC years (adjusted to an average 15:00 ES TOI/GP):
Matthews - 0.70
Marner - 0.64
Point - 0.59
Tkachuk - 0.59
Connor - 0.56
Aho - 0.54
Boeser - 0.54
Rantanen - 0.53
Meier - 0.53
Laine - 0.52
ES P/GP at time of signing, 2nd and 3rd ELC years only (adjusted to an average 15:00 ES TOI/GP):
Matthews- 0.79
Marner - 0.68
Point - 0.64
Rantanen - 0.62
Aho - 0.61
Tkachuk - 0.60
Connor - 0.59
Meier - 0.59
Boeser - 0.56
Laine - 0.44
ES P/GP at time of signing, 3rd ELC year only (adjusted to an average 15:00 ES TOI/GP):
Matthews - 0.85
Marner - 0.80
Meier - 0.73
Point - 0.70
Tkachuk - 0.69
Rantanen - 0.65
Aho - 0.62
Boeser - 0.57
Connor - 0.56
Laine - 0.36
And yes, before anybody asks, Matthews and Marner were #1 and #2 respectively in all of these lists before adjusting for TOI. The adjustment pushes their numbers down in all cases except Marner in the first list (he gets a 1.5% bump on his numbers when all years are included). The adjustment most helps Laine, Tkachuk, and Meier.
Also a reminder, Matthews and Marner have been the 2 best per-minute PP producers of these players over their ELCs. The difference is that they get the least PP TOI/GP of any of these forwards except Meier.
People need to stop letting a team stat like PP opportunities skew their perception of these players.