Tribute Marner Appreciation Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can see the argument of Kuch, Pasta, and maybe Rantanen, Robertson and Hubie but Tage is a huge stretch.

You might want to watch Tage more closely. Not many 6'7" players around who can do what he is doing this year and at 7.1m cap hit. Comparing him to Marner is comparing apples to oranges. His game is closer to 34's than 16's.
 
You might want to watch Tage more closely. Not many 6'7" players around who can do what he is doing this year and at 7.1m cap hit. Comparing him to Marner is comparing apples to oranges. His game is closer to 34's than 16's.
I think he is having a great season and just continue to get better. But I don't think he is up there with guys like AM, Pasta, Kuch or Marner yet. I think he is getting more coverage bc of his 5 goals game last week.
Not saying he is not a top player but just not at the top level yet.
 
You might want to watch Tage more closely. Not many 6'7" players around who can do what he is doing this year and at 7.1m cap hit. Comparing him to Marner is comparing apples to oranges. His game is closer to 34's than 16's.
Oh really? Why don't you pull up TT's defensive numbers lmfao.

Also he's 6'6 and shooting a career high 17% this season and 40% on faceoffs. Just because he's a tall American center that can score doesn't mean he's Matthews comparable.
 
Oh really? Why don't you pull up TT's defensive numbers lmfao.

Also he's 6'6 and shooting a career high 17% this season and 40% on faceoffs. Just because he's a tall American center that can score doesn't mean he's Matthews comparable.

Relax. I said his game is more comparable to 34s than 16s.
 
1. The team supposedly plays too much pond hockey in the regular season. This is not indicative of what is needed in the post season
2. It is then demanded by some that they stop playing pond hockey
3. They then stop playing pond hockey as requested by the demanding fans
4. Responsible, non-pond hockey play leads to non-pond hockey numbers
5. Then the numbers are no longer considered good enough, as they should be pond hockey-like numbers to reflect the dollar they are making

Gotcha. You want Oilers stats but from playing like the Islanders. Sorry, that doesn't equate.
 
Some people don't value the whole game of a player, they look at points and put their blinders on.
I stopped responding when he said Marner hasn’t exceeded his contract but Matthews has lol. Identical playoff numbers, Marner has had more 90 point seasons than Matthews too. I think both are amazing talents. They both took the leafs to the cleaners because the cap never rose. But that really isn’t their problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog
Would anyone here trade Marner for Tage Thompson?

Like right now, not in the offseason or something like that.
 
Would anyone here trade Marner for Tage Thompson?

Like right now, not in the offseason or something like that.
Maybe some of the fans would also swap the sabres standings for the leafs...unless they feel Marner had absolutely nothing to do with them including setting an example of how the game should be played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IPS and ACC1224
big BIG eye roll...lol. As I suspected you are using some warped reality to determine value. Marner is MEETING expectations. Matthews is performing UNDER expectations. 5v5 play? I'm not comparing all 5 players or determining Marner's impact on 5v5. I am looking at his individual stats and play and comparing them to other individual stats and play.

How's the big 4's 5v5 play in games that matter? :)

This is such a poor troll job. Big BIG eye roll? Embarrassing.

There was a time when trolling had a bit of verve, and trolls weren’t so blatantly stupid. Your posts read like a third grader got access to the family PC.
 
Would anyone here trade Marner for Tage Thompson?

Like right now, not in the offseason or something like that.
They'd have to add.

Thompson and Dahlin for Marner and Holl.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad