Yup, to me it doesn't make a great deal of sense. I recognize why people don't want to pay a hefty price for MO, and neither do I. But we have absolutely no clue what his contract demands are yet. We do know that he volunteered himself off of PP1 to help get his teammate going last year. Ultimate leader/teammate move in my mind. Something I certainly am not keen to move on from. my D-core for next year would look like this
Rielly - Brodie
Sandin - Holl
Dermott - Liljegren
In this scenario, we'd have to ask Muzz to waive his NMC to have Seattle take him in the expansion. I am a fan of Muzz, and in an ideal world I would love to keep him. But I think his potential is capped at this point, and although still highly effective, he is entering the back 9 of his career. I've been really impressed with Dermott's overall game this year, and would be a shame to have developed him so well, just for another team to reap the benefit. Obviously this plan hinges on Muzz, but Seattle is a beautiful place to live, and a very good sports market. Given Vegas' success from a handful of seasons ago, I'm sure he wouldn't be completely opposed to the idea. NMC are not put in place to necessarily keep the player in their current market, it just gives them control where they play. This would be the avenue I'd explore vs. moving on from MO