SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,777
This is kinda the problem.. depending on how you look at it.
There could be long term good players but they cannot receive the opportunity in similar roles once up with the big club
If a team is good enough to withstand young guys getting extended looks (which i think this team is) in similar roles to where they are succeeding in the ahl it could be beneficial to that graduation and internal process.
I mean, this top line carries bunting and the body of kerfoot and still does well.. i see no reason why a 2nd line cant carry steeves or mcmann for a longer look..
Bunting hasn't been great recently but when he was at his best, he was still able to contribute in a variety of ways. Kerfoot does as well. It is not like these guys are a pair of nobodies who were not doing similar things in the bottom 6 when they were away from the top guys; obviously playing with top guys means their linemates helped finish some things for them.
McMann didn't really do much in the bottom 6. Same with Steeves. They weren't awful, but it didnt look like they were generating things that their linemates couldn't finish. Anderson looked better and he wasn't given a chance in the top 6 either.
Steeves still has exemption so he likely will be a priority call up next year. Robertson does as well, but he is much better so he has a chance. McMann is older but cheap so he may have a shot, but I don't think he is skilled enough to be on a roster. Big body, works hard, good IQ so he can be a good fill in, but his raw skill is just not there enough for him to do what he does at the NHL level. Maybe he can figure it out, but at 27, there is not much room left for him.