Matt24
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2013
- 5,747
- 2,551
This might be the most insane ruling of Parros’ career. I thought there was an argument for this to at least flirt with double digits. One game is genuinely absurd.
It's a Flame. 10-20 games expected. Only explanation is that they use a dart board.1 game is about as ridiculous as the people in here crying for 10.
should have been at least 3.
Nah, that still goes to the zero game suspension he gave Wilson for his antics on Buch and Panarin a few years back.This might be the most insane ruling of Parros’ career. I thought there was an argument for this to at least flirt with double digits. One game is genuinely absurd.
Good ole NHL wheel of “justice”. Honestly shocked.How in the world did this get just 1 game?!
We shouldn't be. A repeat offender got 2 games in the playoffs for a similar play. If that's 3-4 regular season games than 1 game for a first time offender makes sense.Good ole NHL wheel of “justice”. Honestly shocked.
Fair point. I figured the Benn incident being in the conference finals would make it a bit apples and oranges, evidently not though.We shouldn't be. A repeat offender got 2 games in the playoffs for a similar play. If that's 3-4 regular season games than 1 game for a first time offender makes sense.
People are only shocked because they seem to expect the NHL to give longer suspensions when they rarely do.