Management Thread | The Song Remains the Same Edition

Status
Not open for further replies.
Polygamorous?
That's not really a word but I'll attempt to define it the style of chatgpt urban dictionary:

Polygamorous is a relationship that typically consists of the legs of one Trump and several Bidens. It is considered unethical and is inscrutable to most basics, yet is pseudo legal in some states.
 
I actually agree with you here..There's no doubt that Aqualini 'green lighted' many transactions, especially big UFA signings like Eriksson, Myers, Sundin, or re-signing the Sedins..Is this meddling..?..No. it isnt...All of these moves were researched/endorsed by whoever the GM was at the time.

Even the trip to Vegas to meet Tocchet isnt meddling..Aqualini has to pay the coach out of his own pocket, not the teams..So, I get wanting to meet the coach beforehand.

Having said that, there is plenty of evidence of meddling pre 2014..Not allowing a rebuild in 2013,nixing the Kesler trade, hiring Torts, demanding Nonis trade Kesler to name a few.

Ownership being involved in coach selection like this is *highly* unusual.
 
Why does coaching salary not come from the team? Never heard that before in my life that coaches salary comes directly out of the owners bank account.
 
To the dear fans that have been watching the Canucks for 10+ years,

I kindly ask the following and even just one question answered is appreciated greatly. :allears:


What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?


Is Petterssons best handpicked 3-5 games of the year as good as Peak Kesler ? (2011 vs Preds?)


Is this current Canucks team, with prime Luongo, a playoff team?


BONUS
Would you trade Hughes + 2023 3rd overall pick for Leon Draisaitl ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: theguardianII
To the dear fans that have been watching the Canucks for 10+ years,

I kindly ask the following and even just one question answered is appreciated greatly. :allears:


What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?


Is Petterssons best handpicked 3-5 games of the year as good as Peak Kesler ? (2011 vs Preds?)


Is this current Canucks team, with prime Luongo, a playoff team?


BONUS
Would you trade Hughes + 2023 3rd overall pick for Leon Draisaitl ?
Strengths - dominated all facets of the game, PP, PK, 5v5., goaltending
Weaknesses - Colin Campbell

No.

Yes.

No.
 
To the dear fans that have been watching the Canucks for 10+ years,

I kindly ask the following and even just one question answered is appreciated greatly. :allears:


What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?


Is Petterssons best handpicked 3-5 games of the year as good as Peak Kesler ? (2011 vs Preds?)


Is this current Canucks team, with prime Luongo, a playoff team?


BONUS
Would you trade Hughes + 2023 3rd overall pick for Leon Draisaitl ?

The 10-11 team was basically elite across the board. Best offensive team, best defensive team, best special teams, elite goaltending. The biggest weakness the team had was that they weren't likeable or from a major US city and the media and referee narrative turned against them. On ice, they maybe could have used another scoring winger for Kesler's line.

No. Kesler vs. Nashville was absolutely elite at both ends of the ice.

Yes.

Absolutely not. Draisaitl is only 2 years away from UFA.
 
Ownership being involved in coach selection like this is *highly* unusual.
Rutherford had already identified RT as the new coach..I don’t believe Aqualini was involved in the ‘picking the coach’ process…It’s another case of green lighting the new coach..

Probably not much different than Aqualini wining and dining Myers and Kuzmenko before they signed their deals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: theguardianII
To the dear fans that have been watching the Canucks for 10+ years,

I kindly ask the following and even just one question answered is appreciated greatly. :allears:


What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?


Is Petterssons best handpicked 3-5 games of the year as good as Peak Kesler ? (2011 vs Preds?)


Is this current Canucks team, with prime Luongo, a playoff team?


BONUS
Would you trade Hughes + 2023 3rd overall pick for Leon Draisaitl ?
Weakness: no 4th line, maybe a lack of one shot scorers?

Strengths: 3 lines and 5 dmen who could play against any competition and control the game

The beauty of Kesler vs Preds is he was doing it against arguably the top pairing in the league at the time. Regular season games on a dead roster is like comparing steak to hotdogs. Hotdogs are good but not when everyone else has a rib eye.

Prime Luongo thrived on workload. He dragged a worse lineup to the 2nd round (although they could defend….this roster cannot…but they can score).

No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerjoe and Coffee
Rutherford had already identified RT as the new coach..I don’t believe Aqualini was involved in the ‘picking the coach’ process…It’s another case of green lighting the new coach..

Probably not much different than Aqualini wining and dining Myers and Kuzmenko before they signed their deals.

This is also f***ing weird.

Owners don't meet coaches. Owners don't wine and dine UFAs.
 
Why does coaching salary not come from the team? Never heard that before in my life that coaches salary comes directly out of the owners bank account.
I think the poster meant that coaches salary doesn't count against the cap....?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hit the post
To the dear fans that have been watching the Canucks for 10+ years,

I kindly ask the following and even just one question answered is appreciated greatly. :allears:


What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?


Is Petterssons best handpicked 3-5 games of the year as good as Peak Kesler ? (2011 vs Preds?)


Is this current Canucks team, with prime Luongo, a playoff team?


BONUS
Would you trade Hughes + 2023 3rd overall pick for Leon Draisaitl ?
What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?
- Strengths: Puck Possession / Cycling, Defense (Prime Edler, Hamhuis), Lethal Powerplay, 1A/1B goaltender, Depth (Malhotra, Higgins, Hansen)
- Weaknesses: Hamhuis getting injured doing a hipcheck, Mason Raymond as your 2LW, Keith Ballard contract (I had thought Booth was 2011, but he was 2012).

Is Petey as good as peak Kesler?
- Peak Kesler beat Nashville almost single-handedly. Petey is exceptional, but hasn't done something like that yet.

Is this team with Luongo a playoff team?
- Maybe - but not a good one. Forwards are competitive, but we don't have the same quality defense core or backup goaltender.

Would I trade Hughes for Draisaitl?
- No. IMO our problem isn't scoring - it's defense and goal right now. Getting rid of the only player on the back end who can transition the puck for another forward to score goals doesn't help.
 
Last edited:
What was the 2011 teams strengths and weaknesses?
- Strengths: Puck Possession / Cycling, Defense (Prime Edler, Hamhuis), Lethal Powerplay, 1A/1B goaltender, Depth (Malhotra, Higgins, Hansen)
- Weaknesses: Hamhuis getting injured doing a hipcheck, Mason Raymond as your 2LW, David Booth & Keith Ballard contracts.

Is Petey as good as peak Kesler?
- Peak Kesler beat Nashville almost single-handedly. Petey is exceptional, but hasn't done something like that yet.

Is this team with Luongo a playoff team?
- Maybe - but not a good one. Forwards are competitive, but we don't have the same quality defense core or backup goaltender.

Would I trade Hughes for Draisaitl?
- No. IMO our problem isn't scoring - it's defense and goal right now. Getting rid of the only player on the back end who can transition the puck for another forward to score goals doesn't help.

David Booth wasn't on the 10-11 Canucks.
 
Gee ,where does want start with a victimhood rant like this?

Maybe by explaining how this is a 'victimhood rant'?

Face facts, Aliu wasn't good enough end of story.

Yeah, and if you were discussing in good faith and actually reading things, you'd note that I stated that Aliu would be described as a 'journeyman player' in other posts rather than 'crybaby who wasn't wanted in 23 organizations.' But because folks want to point at PK Subban (or whomever) and say that racism in hockey is solved, here we are.

I also stated that racism might have played a role. It's inarguable that he faced racism through his career (much like many other minority players in the league.)

This site makes mountains out of molehills over prospect development. This player should have been sent back to junior for more season. This player needs to be getting plenty of ice time. This coach doesn't like young players, they're ruining this prospect's development.

We know that there are coaches who didn't like players for personality or non-hockey related reasons. Is it really that much of a reach to think that there would be other extenuating factors?


As for racism in the sport, if you could read. I never denied it's existence, I don't buy this particular race card claim by Aliu ,that he isn't in the league because of systemic racism blah blah blah.

We were discussing the idiocy of Steve Simmon's statement about Aliu. Which bears no resemblance to the nonsense I have quoted above.

Here it is, since it's patently obvious you're just wanting to yell about a player who is getting "uppity."

No one wants to say this because of the politically correct police and all, but those who coached Akim Aliu must cringe every time they see him in a news report or a commercial talking about what’s wrong with hockey. Like he would know.

Being a minority player who experienced racism (enough so that a f***ing NHL coach admitted he said the things Aliu attributed to him) I would think, in fact, Aliu does know.


How come there aren't more South Asians in the NHL? Is that racism too? Is every player of colour who doesn't make NHL a victim of racism?

Weren't you the guy jumping all over someone for bringing up Sheldon Keefe because it wasn't germane to the discussion?

Anyway. You're taking an incredibly binary look at things, which is something I am not fond of the "woke" crowd of doing, either.

Racism is not the sole reason why there aren't 'more' players of colour in the NHL. But it can be seen as a barrier that can be a contributing factor.

Have you heard about this story from 2018? Do you think maybe that if a kid was facing something like that from grown adults they might be disinclined to continue in the sport?

Here's another story borne out of the above one.

After years of playing — and loving — competitive hockey, Roy Neacappo's sons Derek and George gave up and, one after the other, switched to football.

It was striking, the difference in how welcomed and supported they felt as talented Indigenous athletes.

"My son said it felt like he was more accepted playing football," said Neacappo, who lives in Chisasibi, Que.

So yes, if someone isn't feeling welcome or a part of a team and they decide to switch sports because of racist attitudes, I'd say that it does contribute to accessibility issues in the sport, but it's not a sole determining factor.

Folks like to simplify things down with incredibly reductionist takes on things and, when we're talking about complex socio issues, it's not that cut and dry.

Kyle Beach, oh boo hoo, ban a couple of people and fine the team a few million. Any real punishment? LMAO The NHL doesn't care if you are purple with pink polka dots if you make the league money. Oh and Jake Virtanen was a top 5 pick so there goes your argument about Aliu being touted, means nothing until you prove it on the ice.

It's kinda depressing how incredibly close you get and then miss the point.

Both of your examples are more or less restating what I had said. There's no real consequences for vile instances in the game and that's an issue if we're looking at making it more welcoming/less racist/less insular.

And Virtanen was afforded a million and one chances (same as guys like Shane O'Brien.) There was no real explanation for Aliu plummeting from a top 5 first rounder to actually being drafted in the second round like there would be with, say, Angelo Esposito (who was thought to be 1OA until a knee injury sidelined him) or other players where you can look and point at a reason as to why they fell.

The only thing really with Aliu was the shit with Downie. Yet only Aliu seemed to be punished for it.

It's great you acknowledge that racism exists in the game. But it might be worth thinking about what sort of impact it has on players. At all levels, from the NHL on down.
 
Pardon? Are you saying that it's ridiculous and worthless to expect that a management team might analyze other successful franchises and try to emulate them?

And I can't for the life of me make out whatever point you think you're making in the second sentence, I am nowhere close to understanding. A very opaque and angry post, really makes your point seem smart and well-reasoned


The volume of whataboutism nonsense topics you're reaching for here is honestly staggering, definite creativity points. Sure you didn't deny the existence of racism in hockey, you just deny that it affects non-white players (I bet you think you're slick). It's like saying "I'm not a climate changed denier, I just don't think that climate change is going to affect anyone at all".

Saying that the NHL only cares about money makes it seem like your point is that OF COURSE the NHL would allow a non-white star player to be a star in the league because they would drive revenue, indicating that they are not racist. However, the issue here, especially with Akim Aliu, is that he was a fringe NHLer and his race emphatically was a data point when decision makers throughout his career were making decisions that altered the course of his career. That in and of itself is racism, as he was deemed as someone who wouldn't fit as part of a team because he wouldn't accept being called slurs. Most often non-white players need to be exceptional in order to succeed, rather than being able to succeed as an average player in the league. There are of course players who have done just that like DSP, Mike Grier, Wayne Simmonds, etc, but their success is not conclusive evidence against racism in hockey.

Also, let's be honest, the Virtanen comparison is extremely stupid. Please honestly consider whether Virtanen would have gotten as much leeway as he did if he was not a white guy from Canada.
The Virtanen comparison was about draft position since you suggested that Aliu could be as high as 5th. Same draft position. Apparently that was to subtle for you to understand.

As to management and ownership, I was pointing out that the Aqua Men made their money as slum lords and are barely above the criminal class. Once again, your great intellect, if you actually had one, didn't allow you to understand such an obvious point. It was a pretty obvious point.

AA claims racism and no doubt there was, but using racism for failure to make it in the NHL in the last 20 years is pretty lame.

Unfortunately people like you fall back into the politically correct and racial correct assumption that every time a person of colour claims racism it's factual. That's actually a form of racism in itself, because it assumes that racism is so prevalent and systemic that this is an undeniable truth every time it is claimed. Essentially the same position of the White Supremacists currently in control of the Republican Party in the USA, Replacement Theory etc. Everything is a plot against Whites. In Canada, however, a study was released a few years ago showed that on a per capita basis, Chinese, South Korean and South Asian Canadians make more money than their White peers on average. Basically showing that Critical Race Theory is a big stinking mess in a cow pasture. African Americans incidently, were near the bottom economically compared to their peers. Now, if systemic racism did exist, it seems to be focused almost exclusively on African Americans. Hmmmmm. Me thinks not.
Perhaps a little critical thinking on your part, rather than slavish adherence to BLM shaded garbage would be a good place to start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IslandBeast
The Virtanen comparison was about draft position since you suggested that Aliu could be as high as 5th. Same draft position. Apparently that was to subtle for you to understand.

As to management and ownership, I was pointing out that the Aqua Men made their money as slum lords and are barely above the criminal class. Once again, your great intellect, if you actually had one, didn't allow you to understand such an obvious point. It was a pretty obvious point.

AA claims racism and no doubt there was, but using racism for failure to make it in the NHL in the last 20 years is pretty lame.

Unfortunately people like you fall back into the politically correct and racial correct assumption that every time a person of colour claims racism it's factual. That's actually a form of racism in itself, because it assumes that racism is so prevalent and systemic that this is an undeniable truth every time it is claimed. Essentially the same position of the White Supremacists currently in control of the Republican Party in the USA, Replacement Theory etc. Everything is a plot against Whites. In Canada, however, a study was released a few years ago showed that on a per capita basis, Chinese, South Korean and South Asian Canadians make more money than their White peers on average. Basically showing that Critical Race Theory is a big stinking mess in a cow pasture. African Americans incidently, were near the bottom economically compared to their peers. Now, if systemic racism did exist, it seems to be focused almost exclusively on African Americans. Hmmmmm. Me thinks not.
Perhaps a little critical thinking on your part, rather than slavish adherence to BLM shaded garbage would be a good place to start.

Good lord, you think you're very smart but you really don't think very good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad