VanillaCoke
Registered User
- Oct 30, 2013
- 27,139
- 14,041
Imagine Boudreau resigns this week lol
It’s our team and we want not too hemp to be good. Many fans have been calling for a rebuild from back when gillis asked the owner to do that.Amazing how Benning prioritized carrier cultures for all of those years and then let go of two of our biggest carrier cultures at the time (Markstrom and Edler). This team needed to proceed forward with Markstrom and Tanev at the time. Just an absolutely gut wrenching loss that has lead to this miserable state today.
I know people like Sutter, Beagle, Roussel, and Eriksson were significantly overpriced, but contracts aside, we can now see what they did for us in terms of Penalty Killing (Beagle and Sutter), Face-offs (Horvat, Beagle, Sutter), leadership, and having the ability to hold leads (Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson could be thrown out there at any time). Back in 2016, everyone wanted to move Tanev for a pick but look at what Tanev did in the dressing room........and for Quinn Hughes.
How Benning screwed that 2020 off-season is beyond me. He was afraid of committing to term on Tanev and Markstrom (cap hit wasn't the issue here), and then he goes out and gets OEL.
Oh well - hindsight is 20/20. This team is done and needs to be blown up.
I was wrong about this team.
So out of curiosity... who's actually saying this?
I'd also like to point out that this more or less what people wanted for the Colorado plan as the Avs imploding in 2016-17 is how they added Makar to the team when they already had Mackinnon/Rantanen/Landeskog/Duchene. Something I often try to push across here is too many people don't seem to consider the time frame of how these things work.
We need to go at a 102 pace the rest of the way.Anyone know the teams playoff chances?
Disagree with this interpretation/narrative!!So out of curiosity... who's actually saying this?
I'd also like to point out that this more or less what people wanted for the Colorado plan as the Avs imploding in 2016-17 is how they added Makar to the team when they already had Mackinnon/Rantanen/Landeskog/Duchene. Something I often try to push across here is too many people don't seem to consider the time frame of how these things work.
It is next years pre-season at this point it should be anywayCan we (ie YOU to whoever does this thankless job) please update some of these thread titles? Preseason what? Some of us aren't on every day etc.
Also?!!!! New thread for post game! Game thread is for live reactions...post game is for diagnosis and analysis.
Who is with ME!?
WHO IS WITH ME????
No but seriously please start a new thread for the people not losing their shit and want to talk exesandohs
1) Miller (29) was signed to an 8 year deal and so you get off on a technicality.
2) Boeser should not have been re-signed.
3) Our 1st round pick wasn't traded but a 2nd was basically gifted to Chicago.
We get it. You hate Benning but your bias has clearly clouded your judgement.
Ps - Benning got Petey to sign at 7.3 million and so your Miller AAV comment is clearly out to lunch.
Wow, thanks for telling me 3 things that I noted in my post. Is this HFsplaining?
7.3M for Petey is not an amazing deal considering the term and circumstances (RFA vs UFA)
I stand by what I said. This past off-season would have been Benning's best off-season in Vancouver if it were performed by him. Tell me which of his off-seasons was better.
It was interesting when he was asked about changes.. he wanted to say yes and caught himself.. atleast what i thinkI have believed that as soon as the ink dried on the Miller extension that this franchise was closer to a rebuild than being a legitimately good team. They'll be there within 2 seasons, I'd wager.
If you listen to Pettersson's interview last night, guy sounds defeated. I'm not sure how they keep some of these guys around, speaking of the Pettersson bridge deal.
This off-season felt like just another off-season. Certainly not wildly different than Benning. It felt like earlyish Lindenning to me. Said so all summer.
I disagree with almost every point you’ve made here. The team was trending no where with Benning. He was awful in every regard. He’s crippled this franchise. We have no youth movement- nothing remotely approaching a team like the Sabres. What in the world this post must come from an alternate reality.Benning wasn't trying to "compete" from 2015 to 2018 ('compete' as in win a cup). Him and Linden were realistic as to where this club was after they lost to the Flames in 2015. What he wanted to do was get the young guys to compete so that they could make the playoffs and get playoff exposure so that it would aid in their development. He wanted the young guys on the team to earn their spots and positions on the roster while being surrounded by good character vets.
After 2015, Benning had two primary options:
1) Push kids into the line-up even if they weren't quite ready.
2) Insulate whatever youth you had in the line-up (on the farm or via acquired reclamation projects), and surround them with veteran character players.
Benning initially tried to do option #1 by gifting Virtanen and McCann roster spots but the plan failed miserably.......and so Benning went with #2 which was extremely controversial. Since we had little to nothing in the system that was ready to be elevated, Benning spent picks on reclamation projects such as Vey, Granlund, Baertschi, etc. (lukewarm success but major failure for the most part). Benning also tried to bring in vets that would set the culture for this team.
I won't go into all the reasons as to why "the culture carriers" approach was a failure (you guys know all the reasons and its been repeated at nauseam), but I will say this:
1) This team was starting to trend upwards during the 2019-2020 season
2) With Beagle and Sutter here, we had an excellent PK if I recall correctly (or middle or the pack, my memory is fading)
3) As much of a shitshow as Loui Eriksson was, you could almost always depend on Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson to be thrown out there to protect a lead and take on the toughest match-ups.
As we saw in the bubble that year, our team chemistry was very strong. We defeated a superior Blues team and managed to push Vegas to 7 games even though we had no business doing so. Demko was off the hook against Vegas obviously, but a lot of that bubble success had to do with our team chemistry. Guys like Markstrom, Tanev, Edler, Beagle, Sutter, and Roussel helped make that room tick......and even players afterwards talked about how a leadership void existed once Markstrom, Tanev, Edler, and Toffoli were gone.
In my opinion, Benning should have done two things differently:
1) Handle the 2020 post bubble off-season much better (replace Green with Boudreau/etc., move on from Boeser and Virtanen, find a way to move Baertschi and Sutter, keep all of Markstrom, Tanev, and Toffoli).
2) Instead of signing expensive vets to 5-6 year deals, weaponize cap space and bring in overpaid vets from other teams with picks attached (i.e. instead of signing Prust, accept Bickell with a 1st attached). Instead of going after Loui Eriksson, going after another vet on a shorter term deal, etc. Maybe even sign a PTO-calibre vet to a multi-year deal (2-3 years) if you want a blend of veteran leadership and contracts expiring at an appropriate time.
Anyways, hindsight is 20/20. Benning made a lot of awful moves, but I do find it funny that the people that mocked Benning for being obsessed with "intangibles" are now the same guys that are complaining about a lack of leadership in the room, as well as our awful PK (Beagle, Sutter), and an inability to hold leads (Pearson-Horvat-Eriksson). A lot of these guys also wanted to trade Tanev to Toronto back in 2016 (Tanev played a massive role in helping Hughes acclimate).
Benning's biggest downfall in my eyes is that he broke his promise. Benning's promise was that all/most of our 'veteran/transitional' contracts would be off the books once we were ready to move upwards. After the 2020 bubble, Benning failed to move guys like Baertschi and Sutter to clear cap space while letting guys like Markstrom, Tanev, and Toffoli walk.
I’m emotionally disengaged from the Canucks but I find this fascinating. So much blame to go around:
-ownership for letting it get to this point by supporting years of mismanagement
-Benning and Weisbrod for slowly destroying the structure of the organization apart to strike their overinflated egos and make the worse decisions time and time again
-new management for doubling down on a team that has proved to be emotionally fragile and choosing but not executing on a middle path
-coaching going with suboptimal lineups and reverting to the least creative and effective options at a moment’s notice
-the entitled players that have accomplished nothing; given big contracts but show up for training camp unprepared and look completely lost to start the season
Now management is in such a hole there’s nothing they can do; nearly every player is valueless. Players that actually have shown up will be lost. Even if they turn it around and go on a good run the best case scenario is identical to last season. Just not good enough to ever compete for anything significant. Only hope for legitimate contention is on unrealistic circumstances going the Canucks way again and again (draft lottery win, Miller traded to a dumb team for a haul, Horvat takes a discount, traded players net unlikely returns that contribute quickly).
They can’t go forward with this group but because they chose to try and succeed with them, nothing can be done.
It’s f*cking purgatory.
has anyone mentioned the coachig staff. Jason King is pretty much self explanatory, i still dont understand how he was able to keep his job. Mike Yeo, i was always wary about that hire. Trent Cull? i was extremely surprised he was hired to the big club, his coaching records for our AHL team was not good so i was perplexed about that.