Interesting thought. I imagine that could be the case.
I think it's quite a bit more likely that he just doesn't have the type of character that scouts look for (from what they gather from the interview and taking to coaches, etc)
Interesting thought. I imagine that could be the case.
Montreal is twice the city that Detroit is, and is definitely a top 10 destination for players ( top 5 if I recall in a poll from a few years ago)
2011-2012 NHLPA Player Poll:
What team would you most like to play on?
1. Chicago Blackhawks 14%
2. Detroit Red Wings 13%
3. Boston Bruins 11%
4. Toronto Maple Leafs 8%
5. Montreal Canadiens 6%
6. Tampa Bay Lightning 5%
Voted by the players themselves.
http://www.playerspoll.ca/results/2...eams/what-team-would-you-most-like-to-play-on
Ok glad you found it....aaand you've been educated zetterberg40
As have you on twice the place to play.
I doubt a kid from the Quebec Province sandbagged a Montreal interview though.
More likely the Wings wanted to talk about the things he does well and it was a more comfortable conversation.
In any event might want to look up where most of the Detroit players live and the fact that most have stayed in the area. Even guys like Yzerman that have left for other jobs have kept their Michigan homes, one of the more shocking ones was Fedorov still owned him Bloomfield Hills home when he was playing in Washington not sure if he has sold it since, but he held onto that for basically an entire decade.
Goes across almost all sports, if Detroit was such a toilet area as is often referenced how come almost all of these millionaire athletes that can live anywhere spend a bulk of their year living in Detroit? Turns out the suburban area of Detroit has some of the best schools (if you had children) and nicest areas to live in the World. Not saying the best, but not the picture often put out by the people that love spreading the logic that nobody should want to live there.
As have you on twice the place to play.
Didn't say that my friend. Said Montreal is twice the city Detroit is, which you'd be hard pressed to find someone who would disagree.
Good thing that's relevant.
Didn't say that my friend. Said Montreal is twice the city Detroit is, which you'd be hard pressed to find someone who would disagree.
Zetterberg40 mentions Montreal as amongst the worst places to play, and this is what you choose to comment on?
I agree though, it isn't overly relevant. Just wanted to mention it to someone who doesn't seem to know anything about the city.
A guy "not wanting" to play somewhere could be worrisome for a team like Detroit that has prospects spending years in the minors.
If you're a bottom six grinder, yeah, playing for Detroit can take awhile. The reason their prospects take a long time is because most of them are projects from the outset. Guys like Nyquist, Tatar, Kindl, and Smith needed two or three years in the minors to be effective NHL players. There are exceptions like DeKeyser, Zetterberg, and Datsyuk that just stepped right in.
A guy like Mantha, however, doesn't have much competition in the top 6. Alfredsson and Bertuzzi will likely be gone in a season or two. So he'll have to battle guys like Abdelkader, Franzen, Nyquist, and Tatar for 1 of the top 4 winger spots in a year or two. If he can't out perform Abdelkader for top 6 minutes then yeah, he'll be back in the minors. I don't think he'll have much trouble, though, unless he can't handle the speed of the NHL.
I thought I read somewhere here at HFBoards that Mantha has finnish roots, Mantha is apparently a finnish last name... is this true? He kind of looks finnish too when you think of it.
Theres a lot of people that would disagree. I mean I wouldnt really have a problem with you taking Grigs, Its the without a moments hesitation part thats kind of ridiculous.
You wouldnt take a moment to consider taking the guy who has dominated the Q more and dominated the world juniors more?
Really I wouldn't hesitate. It's def. Grigs pour moi. Grigs tops out as a first line center, and Mantha looks like a one dimensional winger who ,admittedly, scores bucket-fulls. Both should be top six guys...All things being equal centers tend to be more valuable BUT, things dont seem equal somehow...
Partly, it's what my gut is telling me.
Grigs can be electrifying. Mantha makes scoring look easy at times. BUT he also looks lazy + disinterested at other times. Something about him, just brings up red flags/ rubs me the wrong way...Can't quite put my finger on it...
Not a very Cogent argument, granted
Haha, that actually makes a lot of sense and, thinking about it, it's exactly the strategy I'd useMakes you wonder if players sand-bag interviews with certain teams because they just dont want to play for them, then interview properly with other teams that they want.
Example, if i was a FOR SURE top 40 prospect, like Mantha. What does he have to lose? If you dont want to play for the Isles, Buffalos or Montreals of the world.. just say some stupid ****... then when a team like Chicago, Detroit or someone else asks you stuff and you answer it properly.. you're set? Worse case scenario is you drop a few and still get picked by a squad you didnt want. Either way, you're drafted.
I personally dont see it as a negative but maybe its a strategy... hell, idk.
Really I wouldn't hesitate. It's def. Grigs pour moi. Grigs tops out as a first line center, and Mantha looks like a one dimensional winger who ,admittedly, scores bucket-fulls. Both should be top six guys...All things being equal centers tend to be more valuable BUT, things dont seem equal somehow...
Partly, it's what my gut is telling me.
Grigs can be electrifying. Mantha makes scoring look easy at times. BUT he also looks lazy + disinterested at other times. Something about him, just brings up red flags/ rubs me the wrong way...Can't quite put my finger on it...
Not a very Cogent argument, granted
Haha, that actually makes a lot of sense and, thinking about it, it's exactly the strategy I'd use
I dunno man, youre right Grigs tops out as a top line center. But he looks just as lazy out there as Mantha (which I think both are overstated a bit) but I would be much more worried about a center being lazy than a winger. Lazy centermen are going to have a hard time in the NHL. I knnow the position is usually more valuable, but thats because they handle defensive responsibility much more. Not sure I would count on Grigs for that
Yeah, I knew as soon as I called Mantha lazy/ disinterested at times, that somebody would counter with that. BUT Grigs , to me, has that WOW factor moreso than Mantha...
Then why say it? Doubt you've watched Mantha much.
Why, what did I say about Mantha that doesn't ring true to you? Both have flaws , I just think Grig has a higher ceiling, although maybe less likely to reach it. There's that Russian factor thing that scares some people off...But he also had that cultural adjustment to deal with when playing in the Q...How do u think Mantha would have done playing in Russia as a Jr? Ever think of that?
Why, what did I say about Mantha that doesn't ring true to you? Both have flaws , I just think Grig has a higher ceiling, although maybe less likely to reach it. There's that Russian factor thing that scares some people off...But he also had that cultural adjustment to deal with when playing in the Q...How do u think Mantha would have done playing in Russia as a Jr? Ever think of that?
you're reaching