So why was Brian Burke really fired? That’s the concern. If he was fired strictly for hockey reasons, then why are they replacing him with his right-hand man, a guy whose finger-prints are all over this current roster?
Clearly, Burke was fired because he speaks his mind, and not because MLSE is worried about the direction of the club. If it was worried about the direction of the team, then Dave Nonis wouldn’t have been hired to take Burke’s place. After all, isn’t Nonis a Burke guy? Did Dave Nonis not learn his trade largely under Burke? It’s like MLSE is replacing Brian Burke with Brian Burke Lite.
Why does MLSE feel Dave Nonis can do the job when Burke couldn’t? Because he’s a little more patient than Burke? Because he believes that Robert Luongo will deliver the Leafs to the promised land?
Or is it because he’ll be a good boy with the media and not say anything too controversial?
That’s my concern — that this move was made largely for cosmetic reasons, not for hockey reasons. If MLSE is not convinced that Burke’s rebuild is on track, then start fresh.
Or, if the man they want is currently unavailable, then give Nonis the job on an interim basis, with the understanding that if the team doesn’t live up to expectations, he’s gone at the end of the season.
I don’t have a problem with Burke getting canned as GM. But it’s wrong if it was done for reasons other what was happening on the ice. If MLSE is heading into a new era of hiring guys who toe the party line and always say and do the politically correct thing, then that’s just sad.