After reviewing the OHL website. It does not show us how many face-offs won in the last 3 minutes of a game and on specialty units wins, that is the reason GM and scouts go themselves on sites to see players play. Seeing the site face-offs wins and losses, Lawrence with only 30 games in and 468 attempts is second on the team right now with 234 wins to Julien's 37 games 502 attempts and 285 wins. It does not give us how well each are doing on the very important on most needing to win face-offs. I am liking what I am seeing of Lawrence so far with only the few numbers we have.
I don't know how you got fixated on Lawrence being brought in for his faceoff prowess. He had a 46.7% winning percentage last season and is only at 50% this season.
If your hypothesis is correct, and he is somehow much better at faceoffs in the last 3 minutes of a game, that means he's even worse the rest of the game (that's how percentages work). How would you explain that? He doesn't care to try on faceoffs the rest of the game? Saving his strength for crunch time?
McCue and Barkey both are regulars on this team that play on the PK already and have better faceoff percentages than Lawrence and are the same handedness. Crunch time faceoffs go to them. Right handed faceoffs are a bit of an issue but even O'Rielly has a better faceoff percentage than Lawrence.
Listen. I don't have anything against acquiring Kaleb Lawrence for the price that Mark Hunter did. He should be a nice complimentary piece in the bottom six to create space for players like Nicholl and Van Gorp, but he should not be displacing anyone in the top 6--or playing centre on this team. He's very much a straight-line, physical player who would be a good trigger man for more skilled players, like Haltunnen with Barkey and Cowan (hence the Nicholl and Van Gorp suggestion).