I was actually thinking of him while reading over some of the posts. Burns was never a great defender IMO. I was sorely disappointed with his play in the post season.I see a lot of Brent Burns in him
I was actually thinking of him while reading over some of the posts. Burns was never a great defender IMO. I was sorely disappointed with his play in the post season.I see a lot of Brent Burns in him
I was thinking Dougie Hamilton.I was actually thinking of him while reading over some of the posts. Burns was never a great defender IMO. I was sorely disappointed with his play in the post season.
Don't think he can successfully grow the beard.I see a lot of Brent Burns in him
Defensive IQ is not something that easy to taught and learn like some seem to think, especially for a Dmen. I'm not that sure Mailloux will be able to have that. Didn't see improvement in that part of the game since last yearWho said he was a bust ?
- a franco-ontarienHe's from a French community in Southern Ontario
I didn't get that sense out from his post many many defenseman have gone on to have decent careers without being stalwart defenders. Much depends on how you pair them and understanding what you truly have. The reality is the very top defenders just have more of the stuff you can't teach.Defensive IQ is not something that easy to taught and learn like some seem to think, especially for a Dmen. I'm not that sure Mailloux will be able to have that. Didn't see improvement in that part of the game since last year
Your comment....sounds like you have labelled him a bust as a defenseman.
Yeah MSL/Robidas are going to prefer the steady play of Kovacevic and he won't displace Barron or Savard if he's still with us. No way they keep him around as a 7.While he COULD probably play in Montreal next year and provide decent offensive numbers, he'll get benched and scratched for defensive mistakes.
He needs to spend since time in Laval, and that's perfectly fine. As many have said already, he barely played in the last two years.
Patience.
Jets have 2024 TDL as leverage. They don't have to deal with habs if they think they can get more next TDLWe are not trading our 1st or Slaf. We are using the Trouba leverage card. We talked about this before... you're ignoring circumstance. Jets took futures in the Trouba trade and they were more contenders then vs who they are now.
Jets are not in the drivers seat on this one bud. Rethink that through
It would have to be a fairly large one.Maybe Mailloux and Hutson fit on the PP together.
Damn spelling.
He just posted on Sunday.What happened to General Nimitz's reports? Made a handful of allusions to his own imminent demise hope it didn't happen yet.
Imagine the numbers he'd put up had he actually played the last 2 years. I also doubt the D would be as bad.
20 goals for a D is no jokeLogan starting to feel it offensively at the OHL level.
20 goals for a D is no joke
He's almost leading the team in goals as a D lmaoIt is definitely not.. real chance for him to hit 30-35
Jets have 2024 TDL as leverage. They don't have to deal with habs if they think they can get more next TDL
Least schizo hf habs posterLogan Mailloux is going to make Lane Hutson jealous .
Bilingual LM
Skating LM .Size LM Physical LM
Speed LM .Wrist Shot LM .Snapshot LM. Slapshot LM .PP QB LM.PK LM Defense LM.
Weight 220 LM. Height 6-3 LM.
Most NHL ready LM
Get Lane some Kleenex please
While he COULD probably play in Montreal next year and provide decent offensive numbers, he'll get benched and scratched for defensive mistakes.
He needs to spend some time in Laval, and that's perfectly fine. As many have said already, he barely played in the last two years.
Patience.
Will be interesting to see what the NHL does and what hoops if any they make the Habs and Mailloux jump through to get him in the league. 20 goals is nice for a dman.
Hope you are right but until the league gives the ok anything can happen. When the Bruins signed Mitchell Miller, Bettman commented on Mailloux saying he would have to get approved even if he has a contract as there remains a ban in place. I think the league will let him play due to the stuff you mentioned but they could potentially argue what he did goes against the league morality etc codes and because of that he cannot play.I genuinely don't see how they can. What he did is in fact a misdemeanor and he's already done counselling + spoken to young men about why what he did was wrong.
If they ask for much more and I was Mailloux I'd file a lawsuit. It's a little fuzzy because he committed the crime in another country but in Canada it's pretty hard to not hire someone because of a misdemeanor action from when they were a minor.
I hope I never see that! lol.I see a lot of Brent Burns in him