Agreed.
Pretty much every day on Twitter the same lame talking points are trotted out by woke middle-aged sportswriters still mad about the pick:
Well he has about 30 total games of OHL experience and that means he has alot to learn.
Agreed.
Pretty much every day on Twitter the same lame talking points are trotted out by woke middle-aged sportswriters still mad about the pick:
In answer to what no-one has ever said?No, he's only saying that he is not 'too good for the OHL'
In answer to what no-one has ever said?
Does that count?Renaud said it.
Il est probablement trop fort pour la OHL. Il va certainement brûler la ligue cette année. 7 buts déjà pour Logan Mailloux en 14 matchs. Il a aussi 7 passes jusqu’à présent pour une moyenne d’un point par matchIn answer to what no-one has ever said?
It makes sense that as the year progresses he will become even more dominant.Il est probablement trop fort pour la OHL. Il va certainement brûler la ligue cette année. 7 buts déjà pour Logan Mailloux en 14 matchs. Il a aussi 7 passes jusqu’à présent pour une moyenne d’un point par match
"He is probably too good for the OHL. He is certainly going to torch the league this year.Already 7 goals for Logan in 14 games. He also has 7 assists for a ppg average."
Does that count?
I'd be willing to bet the Habs looked into it before signing him.Shouldn't the team find out if it is a permanent ineligibility?
Agreed.
Pretty much every day on Twitter the same lame talking points are trotted out by woke middle-aged sportswriters still mad about the pick:
That's just your opinion, smart guy, lol. Wow. Seriously, I would just like the NHL to clarify their statement.It isn't permanent for both legal and business reasons.
Though the right to resort to judicial review in Canada with respect to decisions made by private organizations has been restricted by recent cases like R v Jockey Club ex parte Aga Khan and Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses ( Judicial Committee) v. Wall its the fear of litigation that would trouble the NHL if it made the draconian decision of a permanent ban for an offence that was committed by a minor. During the discovery process that forms an essential part of any litigation, the plaintiff (Mailloux) would have access to any internal non-privileged communications (hard copy and electronic) that was not privileged and the right to cross examine a representative of the NHL and, if Bettman is a named party, he could be subject to cross-examination. This discovery process could reveal matters that may be very embarrassing to the NHL particularly if it comes out that one of the motivating factors is a fear of the loss of sponsorships and not the concern over a violation of some standard of decency that the NHL is supposedly operating under. The discovery process will force the NHL to explain the double standard it has and continues to operate under where it has allowed convicted felons to continue their lucrative careers in the NHL unencumbered. It's the fear of litigation and the almost certain embarrassing exposure of the league's hypocrisy that will result in Mailloux's re-instatement. The league will, at some suitable time in the near future, solemnly announce that Mailloux's post incident behaviour has been exemplary and warrant's the redemptive step of regained eligibility. It will be the right decision legally and morally. More importantly, from the NHL's perspective, it will be the smart business decision.
Agreed.
Pretty much every day on Twitter the same lame talking points are trotted out by woke middle-aged sportswriters still mad about the pick:
but he also created liarsThat's why God created lawyers.
Bettman who seems to really enjoys to be on every pictures with the draftees, each year at the draft day, will certainly ask for the infamous picture of the "member" of the NHLPA concerned . Then he will decide if he needs to meet this young horse, and offers him his pardon if Mailloux accepts Bettman conditionsAnyone else concerned in this woke era that the NHL will make it difficult for Logan Mailloux to get cleared? Amazing that the current thugs in the league are grandfathered in despite of their past behavior.
he isn't an expert ; he's a Leafs fanTypical non athletic bed wetters posing as sport experts.
Terrible take, he has been overall pretty solid defensively in his past 5-7 games and heavily relied on in every situations. He is not perfect and gets beat at times, but he plays alot of minutes and is largely better defensively than the average OHLer.His offensive output isn't really that impressive (not factoring in missed time) but his shot is NHL level.. but as has always been the case, his defensive ability is a mess and it isn't really OHL level good right now.
So take the extreme positive side (Renaud Lavoie saying he should be in the NHL which is nonsense) and the extreme negative side and find the truth in the middle, as always.
If Mailloux plays this kind of O-game in the NHL, his defensive flaws won't make him worse than what Souray was.Terrible take, he has been overall pretty solid defensively in his past 5-7 games and heavily relied on in every situations. He is not perfect and gets beat at times, but he plays alot of minutes and is largely better defensively than the average OHLer.
Sometimes I wonder if these pundits ever watched Mailloux play or are they basing their opinions on the consensus of the extremes they choose to adopt. In the case of Mailloux both extremes are erroneous. Let us wait and see how this player develops. But as I previously posted, his development to date, when one considers the time he has missed due to COVID, suspension and injury, has been impressive. Some elements of his game are already NHL level ready. Some elements are not. Mailloux will play in the the NHL, for Montreal or some other team. That is indisputable. His ultimate impact in the NHL however, will depend on how well he develops those elements of his game that are currently not NHL ready.His offensive output isn't really that impressive (not factoring in missed time) but his shot is NHL level.. but as has always been the case, his defensive ability is a mess and it isn't really OHL level good right now.
So take the extreme positive side (Renaud Lavoie saying he should be in the NHL which is nonsense) and the extreme negative side and find the truth in the middle, as always.
murderers, rapists, pedo's, serial killers, cannibals....Toronto Maple Leafs etcbut he also created liars
Agreed.
Pretty much every day on Twitter the same lame talking points are trotted out by woke middle-aged sportswriters still mad about the pick: