ThaDevilGirl
Every day is a day off
... Does it matter?Maybe I’m missing something but didn’t he only show the photos/video with his teammates?
If so did they snitch on him?
... Does it matter?Maybe I’m missing something but didn’t he only show the photos/video with his teammates?
If so did they snitch on him?
Kinda... Does it matter?
Kinda
Those are some rly shitty teammates.
So it's his teammates faults, amirite?Kinda
Those are some rly shitty teammates.
He posted on social media. She was pissed that it was so obvious she had sex with such a dumbass.Kinda
Those are some rly shitty teammates.
Different countries. Different mentalities regarding those situations. Also, and significantly more important in this case, police corps doing the right thing.I played college football, and what Mailloux did was unfortunately in every looker room.
He paid is due. However, I’m wondering if he’s stupid, because only the stupids get cought ..
He posted on social media. She was pissed that it was so obvious she had sex with such a dumbass.
I would be extremely surprise personally and wouldn’t agree with itI wouldn't be surprised if he really stands out in pre-season and starts the year with the big club.
I hope so but getting a bad vibe
En anglais
I don’t like him but why lie? Renaud’s broken plenty of bigger things.It's Renaud's biggest scoop of his career and he sounds so desperate. "Multiple sources" beurk.
The French one is mediocre I guess.
I don’t like him but why lie? Renaud’s broken plenty of bigger things.
With the ages of the participants not in any sane jurisdiction.She was an adult that made sex to a drunk minor. Turn sex arround and you guys called it rape…
Dumb, rude, and thoughtless, and he, unlike the many NHLers who have done worse was punished and shamed. He’s cleared to play now, so it’s done.It was posted in a private group.......dumb move but not remotely as bad as some are determined to make it seem. He paid the price and it is in the past now can we just move on.
Imagine trying to ruin your 17 year old teammates life for doing something tons of guys do privately in an attempt to impress his older teammates.
Even if certain players had an issue it should have been handled internally.
Makes me happy knowing he has a legitimate shot at an NHL career while these guys are stuck playing third division hockey in Sweden.
Imagine trying to ruin your 17 year old teammates life for doing something tons of guys do privately in an attempt to impress his older teammates.
Even if certain players had an issue it should have been handled internally.
Makes me happy knowing he has a legitimate shot at an NHL career while these guys are stuck playing third division hockey in Sweden.
These were accusations that the NHL can't act on and I didn't see anything about convictions as I had mentioned. The world is full of rapey men and women who lie about it and vice versa so without a conviction of any sort this stuff is meaningless.
Am I wrong? Was there a settlement? Even settlements don't necessarily imply guilt as sometimes people pay to not have to go through with the legal process which can be more expensive and very public. Or, innocent people sometimes settle out of fear of being wrongly convicted.
Why even mention the WJC team as once again there are no convictions and without convictions are at the very least pending charges there is nothing that can be done by the NHL. You also can't just paint those entire rosters as guilty.
So once again are there any NHLers that escaped discipline/repercussions following criminal convictions?
edit: Upon further research all four were acquitted so there is absolutely nothing that the NHL could do. I do agree that any of them who had sex with her would qualify as a dirtbag as there were two 30 year olds, a 27 year old and a 26 year old among the males and she was only 17 which is legal in D.C. Reprehensible, yes but not illegal therefore not punishable by the NHL.
All 4-Caps players were also traded away / allowed. to walk away a few weeks later..D.C. law-enforcement officials gave comments to the press without the evidence to back them up. Lt. Reginald L. Smith, then a spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police Department, told the Washington Post that the cops “have sufficient grounds to believe that a criminal offense did occur.”