Tmac37
Registered User
The NHL is a 2 goalie league now. Having a guy that can help you win every night is so important.
Remember the Leafs when Hutchinson would play?
Remember the Leafs when Hutchinson would play?
The NHL is a 2 goalie league now. Having a guy that can help you win every night is so important.
Remember the Leafs when Hutchinson would play?
Who are your comparables for him? We did the Dobby/Halak level thing and neither guy could handle the starter role. That's what you get for way less, and I don't think anyone here would have been rejoicing if the Bruins had re-upped Halak and decided to go with him and Swayman.
Remember Carolina when the Zamboni driver had to play? Wait . . .
A Swayman/Halak. or Rask/Swayman combo later on this season would have been fine.
I see the logic, just not the direction I would have gone. It's not like Ullmark has a winning pedigree that deserves that contract.That definitely was the risk Sweeney was not prepared to take, either with Halak or Vladar. I don't blame him a bit for that. We all think (and I think the Bruins think) that Swayman is the real deal. He's also 22 and young goalies will struggle. He could even get injured and be out for a bit. Halak is not the guy you want taking the reins in that case, and there is just no way you can fault the Bruins for not putting a bunch of eggs in the Rask basket either.
They aren't really that tight though. At the trade deadline they would be able to add a guy with a 6 mill cap hit without moving salary.I see the logic, just not the direction I would have gone. It's not like Ullmark has a winning pedigree that deserves that contract.
Maybe Ullmark will be fine. Maybe he won't. I want him to do well. But overall, he NEEDS to match his contract with his play. Margin of error is small for this.
Bruins tight on cap though, so hope whatever moves they've made were the right ones. Because like other seasons... misplaced cap has hurt the Bruins in the past.
Not sure what you mean by this, but from my interpretation, I don't think your math checks out.
I'll do the sameI suck at math. I removed my post because nothing about it checks out
They are 21st in spending on goaltending out of the 32 teams as well.They are saving in goal. They went from 9.25M AAV to 5.9M AAV in net. How are people really complaining about Ullmark when he hasn’t played a game yet.
Couple of BIG notable differences there though, BillThe TNT pregame show just did a segment on how they're hoping Martin Jones (and a better team defense) will help take some of the pressure off Carter Hart. That it's been too much too soon and too much pressure for the young kid, but they still believe he'll be their starter.
Same logic went into Ullmark/Swayman.
The TNT pregame show just did a segment on how they're hoping Martin Jones (and a better team defense) will help take some of the pressure off Carter Hart. That it's been too much too soon and too much pressure for the young kid, but they still believe he'll be their starter.
Same logic went into Ullmark/Swayman.
I was one arguing for Swayman/Vladar... But anointing neither of the "the starter". Battle for starts keeping them both fresh/active and competitive.Last night is exactly why I was defending the Ullmark signing and disagreeing with people who wanted to sign a cheap back-up or keep Vladar. Goaltending in the NHL is a tough gig and you can't anoint young goalies. Swayman's going to struggle. They just need to do their best to make sure it doesn't snowball. If he was the preemptive starter then the pressure would be even higher and he'd have little to no room to work on his game away from the spotlight. That's how you ruin young goalies and kill your season. Just seen that story too many times.
It's only one game but at least this way they can take his temperature and give him a week or whatever they decide.
$100 on him to win the vezina @ +3100 is standing strong.