Lucic is breaking down?
(We're not talking about Kesler getting 6.875 million until he's 38)
What planet does a #1 UFA sign for 5 million a year?
HF just loves shoveling ******** to suit their arguments.
Yes, his production has been diminishing for years. Pretty easy to fact check that.
Kesler being a garbage contract that'll hurt in a few years (it is, and it will) doesn't mean that the Lucic contract isn't a bit too much and quite a bit too long as well. It's possible for more than one team to make stupid mistakes. McDavid didn't get him there, job $ecurity did. That just sounds like a really bad thing to say in an interview, so they'll use terms like "winning culture", "great fans", "great place to play", "great future", "great teammates", etc.
So you're saying Edmonton has improved to the point where they can land high profile free agents by offering competitive contracts? That is a huge jump from where we used to be.
It's also pretty funny that you seem to think UFA #1 D are only worth 5.5M. Sekera got paid like a good #3, which is what he is.
It's 24th highest Cap hit for defensemen in the NHL, so yes - he's paid like a 1D. I agree that he's a good 3D, but that's not what his pay is.
And no, I said you're in a position where you can land the top free agents (which is a far cry from the best players in the NHL) if you overpay on money and term. Of course, that just means you're like every other team in the NHL. When a top free agent takes a pay CUT to play in Edmonton so they can play with mcdavid, THEN you can brag.
I don't mean to sound like I'm belittling what it's been like to root for Edmonton, because I'm not. Competent management is finally doing what should have been done years ago. But it's still not a destination of choice, and it's not like the Ducks are a horrible team in a horrible city in a horrible climate. It's going to take more than a couple extra dollars to get someone to go to a team that's still years away from contending in a far worse climate.