Ducks Nation*
Registered User
- Mar 19, 2013
- 16,329
- 4
1D >>> RW prospect
RW is the least valued position in hockey, no GM is going to trade a 1D for anything other than 2D with #1 potential or a 1C.
Lindholm is not a prospect, he's proven.
1D >>> RW prospect
RW is the least valued position in hockey, no GM is going to trade a 1D for anything other than 2D with #1 potential or a 1C.
Anaheim has sure done a great job of managing their cap situation
Hopefully Lindholm misses many more games.
Lindholm is not a prospect, he's proven.
Yes, that's the point. Don't trade Lindholm unless you're getting a huge overpayment for it.
Understandable, but there really isn't any reason to deal Lindholm to Edmonton at all if Drai + isn't what's coming back.
This was offered for Jacob Trouba, Since when does Jacob Trouba and Hampus Lindholm hold the same value. It would take far more then Miller+Skjei to get Lindholm out of Anaheim easily this would be bad for Anaheim.
Anaheim has sure done a great job of managing their cap situation
Hopefully Lindholm misses many more games.
Trouba and Lindholm are close. This board likes to spout off the same tired misinformed lines about Trouba without looking at his advanced stats, his usage or who he was partnered with. Neither is signed. They're very close in value.
Trouba plus Dano for Lindholm and a cap dump (Stoner?) is a great outcome for both sides if they can convince Trouba to take a cheap bridge in order to accommodate his request to be moved. Dano would immediately help Anaheim's top-6, they'd still have a 22 year old top-pairing D and they'd fit him under the cap.
well theres obvious contractual issues going, for the guy to miss 5 games already because he doesnt have a contract, i would be worried about him wanting to stay with the team
Got to think both Lindholm and Trouba are both moved soon, don't know if it'd be for 1 another though.
Sure, Arizona should trade their franchise defenceman for Lindholm
Why? Are you that eager for folks to be distracted with something other than the Trouba situation?
There's no need to be a jerk about it.
lmao how did anaheim hurt you so much
If Lindholm and his agent (Claude Lemiuex) are unwilling to negotiate much from their offseason position ("talk" is cheap) and Murray doesn't think he can get them to move, then I would definitely move Lindholm for Rielly +. I don't know what the appropriate + would be,
The train for Anaheim's 2016-2017 season is departing the station. Either Lindholm wants to be on our train or he doesn't. Regardless, we are quickly reaching the point where it's time to move forward.
Hopefully moving Despres to LTIR and a few AHL moves will free up enough cap to make a trade like this, even if we are still a little short to try and meet Lindholm's private contract demands.
2 1sts and 2 2nds will get it done. No need to trade Pulju