Prospect Info: Lias Andersson

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is risky. There's a greater chance he gets demoted/scratched than staying a 3c or getting promoted. Then you run the risk of killing his confidence.

To me, he's too young to be a difference maker in the NHL. The SHL is arguably the 2nd best hockey league in the world.

Find me someone that would argue that the SHL is the second-best league out there.
 
This is risky. There's a greater chance he gets demoted/scratched than staying a 3c or getting promoted. Then you run the risk of killing his confidence.

To me, he's too young to be a difference maker in the NHL. The SHL is arguably the 2nd best hockey league in the world.

the KHL would be that actually. and by a comfortable margin.

i give him his 9 games and if he lights it up, who knows.

send him back to sweden after if he's not ready. nothing to lose.

i still think he could surprise and stick.
 
I agree with your point about Lias being better off by staying in the SHL another year. But I don't understand the need to put a false statement that makes your whole post questionable. KHL is a clearcut 2nd best league. SHL is probably not even a 3rd best behind AHL but here's a room for a discussion. It would have been enough if you said that SHL is a very good league for Andersson to continue developing for another year.

It's all subjective and cant be quantified. I watch plenty of Euro hockey and the SHL is on par with the KHL. That's why I said "arguably".

The SHL has won each of the first three Champions Hockey League titles. Russia is the only major Euro nation that doesnt participate.
 
It's all subjective and cant be quantified. I watch plenty of Euro hockey and the SHL is on par with the KHL. That's why I said "arguably".

The SHL has won each of the first three Champions Hockey League titles. Russia is the only major Euro nation that doesnt participate.

That doesn't make the SHL better than the KHL.
 
This is risky. There's a greater chance he gets demoted/scratched than staying a 3c or getting promoted. Then you run the risk of killing his confidence.

To me, he's too young to be a difference maker in the NHL. The SHL is arguably the 2nd best hockey league in the world.

For a young player it`s a huge morale boost if they can contribute in NHL at his age though. However it will be tough competition in NHL meeting older more experience centers. Maybe give him 9 games - if the coaching staff approves him then we can have this discussion if he should be sent back to Sweden or continue his Ranger career and playing with very good players here in New York. :nod:

Anyway one of his parents should probably live with him for a year or two until he get used to New York and how to live alone in a big city. :)
 
If such young player succeeds - it is a confidence boost, however if he fails (simply because he's not ready) it could be demoralizing.
 
If such young player succeeds - it is a confidence boost, however if he fails (simply because he's not ready) it could be demoralizing.

If finding nhl play a struggle at 18 is demoralizing, he doesn't have the makeup they thought he had

The good young guys leave committed to being more ready next time
 
If such young player succeeds - it is a confidence boost, however if he fails (simply because he's not ready) it could be demoralizing.

Which is why if he shows he isn't ready after 9 games, you send him back to the SHL. I really don't see a downside to letting him get a taste, if he shows in camp that he deserves it. If he clearly isn't ready, send him back to the SHL early, but if he looks like he is close, let him have a few games to see what it is like. There is definitely a benefit it letting a kid get a feel for what he is aiming at.
 
That doesn't make the SHL better than the KHL.

That doesn't make the SHL better than the KHL.

That wasnt my point. My point was there is no way to definitively prove the KHL is a "better" league than the SHL, especially when it comes to NHL development.

Half of Russia's top prospects play in major junior and go directly to NHL. Look at import draft lists and CHL rosters. The top Swedes rarely come to North America for junior. They stay in the SHL until they're ready.

The number of NHL Swedes is double to the number of Russians. Only Canada and the U.S. make more NHLers. In the last 25 years, Sweden has medaled in 17 WC's, Russia 12. Olympics, Sweden has two golds and a silver since 1994, Russia a silver and a bronze and none in the last 3 Olympiads.
 
That wasnt my point. My point was there is no way to definitively prove the KHL is a "better" league than the SHL, especially when it comes to NHL development.

Half of Russia's top prospects play in major junior and go directly to NHL. Look at import draft lists and CHL rosters. The top Swedes rarely come to North America for junior. They stay in the SHL until they're ready.

The number of NHL Swedes is double to the number of Russians. Only Canada and the U.S. make more NHLers. In the last 25 years, Sweden has medaled in 17 WC's, Russia 12. Olympics, Sweden has two golds and a silver since 1994, Russia a silver and a bronze and none in the last 3 Olympiads.

The alternative for these players is MHL, not KHL. You are reaching big time now.
 
The alternative for these players is MHL, not KHL. You are reaching big time now.

The better ones are starting to come to North America.

In terms of 2017 first-year eligibles, seven Russians drafted were from North American leagues, only four from the MHL or VHL.

Most of the top 2018 Russian eligibles will be in North America this season, including the possible 1st overall pick.
 
The better ones are starting to come to North America.

In terms of 2017 first-year eligibles, seven Russians drafted were from North American leagues, only four from the MHL or VHL.

Most of the top 2018 Russian eligibles will be in North America this season, including the possible 1st overall pick.

Which is a problem.

The majority of Russians develop really poorly in NA.
 
In most cases I prefer teenager prospects develop in their home country. Bring them over in the summer and let them do some training and camps. Bring them over and let them face the full cultural adjustment when they're a little older.

Most cases. There are plenty of exceptions.
 
It's not really a problem at all. Past poor performance isn't indicative of the current crop of Russians who have come over.

Things might be a little different than they were 10-15 years ago, but its still a different world, in terms of culture and hockey. These adjustment problems happen for just about all these players, whether they come over as full-fledged stars like Panarin or as juniors. More mature adults and hockey players should adjust better, which is why its better for them to stay in Russia until their early-mid 20's, develop in the KHL, and come over as NHL ready players.
 
NYR have never gone the 9 game route that I can recall.

It was talked about with both Duclair and Del Zotto but both stayed past the 9th game.

My suspicion is that if they think Andersson is ready to contribute, and is better than the next best option at 3C, that they'll just keep him on this year.

The inevitable question is whether playing Andersson in a sheltered bottom 6 here would somehow hurt his offensive development and turn him into more of a 3rd line prospect compared to what he might do with a year in the top 6 in the SHL.
 
NYR have never gone the 9 game route that I can recall.

It was talked about with both Duclair and Del Zotto but both stayed past the 9th game.

My suspicion is that if they think Andersson is ready to contribute, and is better than the next best option at 3C, that they'll just keep him on this year.

The inevitable question is whether playing Andersson in a sheltered bottom 6 here would somehow hurt his offensive development and turn him into more of a 3rd line prospect compared to what he might do with a year in the top 6 in the SHL.

There was never a 9-game option for Duclair. He stayed in juniors in his draft+1 year and he didn't have a late birthday like Chytil, so his only ELC slide had already been used regardless.
 
The Rangers 3rd line is used pretty much as a soft minutes offensive line so if he was in that position it might be a pretty good situation for him. 4th line, maybe not so much
 
The Rangers 3rd line is used pretty much as a soft minutes offensive line so if he was in that position it might be a pretty good situation for him. 4th line, maybe not so much

Frankly, with the type of game Andersson plays, and the maturity with which he plays it, it's not terribly hard to imagine him being able to step right into that kind of role.

Now whether he gets the opportunity is another matter.

But I don't think using Andersson in a third line role will have any negative impact on the type of player he does or does not become.
 
Frankly, with the type of game Andersson plays, and the maturity with which he plays it, it's not terribly hard to imagine him being able to step right into that kind of role.

Now whether he gets the opportunity is another matter.

But I don't think using Andersson in a third line role will have any negative impact on the type of player he does or does not become.

thank you

:handclap:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad