Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: Lias Andersson

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The nice thing with slotting Andersson in at 3C is that you still have the ability to bump Miller into that role in a pinch or if Andersson really starts to struggle without having Miller relegated to the 3C role permanently.

My bet is Andersson stays with the Rangers. The competition just isn't good enough and what little competition there is is probably more suited to the 4th line anyway.
 
I have doubts that Andersson will be an effective NHLer this year. .45 PPG in the SHL is impressive for an 18 year old but I'd prefer to see a full season of continued offensive development, either in Sweden or Juniors, instead of throwing him to the wolves right away. He'd be too focused on minimizing mistakes at this level of hockey and I don't think that's best for his development. First top 10 pick in seven years, let's not **** it up.
 
Edge said:
Frankly, with the type of game Andersson plays, and the maturity with which he plays it, it's not terribly hard to imagine him being able to step right into that kind of role.

Now whether he gets the opportunity is another matter.

But I don't think using Andersson in a third line role will have any negative impact on the type of player he does or does not become.
Click to expand...

I think he makes it. His game and character are needed on the roster. Kids a real leader, that's driven every shift.

Outside of Zucc, that's a missing element on this team.
 
It's also worth noting that Andersson can also easily slide over to the wing as needed. So he does provide some versatility.
 
Edge said:
It's also worth noting that Andersson can also easily slide over to the wing as needed. So he does provide some versatility.
Click to expand...

Edge, what do you think of the ROR comparison. Everything I have seen, read and heard makes him sound like that exact type of player. Utility knife, very tenacious, leader
 
if this kid goes out and plays like he did in rookie camp, and if he's one of the top 12 forwards, the let him play.

he's got a mature attitude and a winners mentality plus skills. if he shows he's ready, thats good enough for me.
 
offdacrossbar said:
if this kid goes out and plays like he did in rookie camp, and if he's one of the top 12 forwards, the let him play.
he's got a mature attitude and a winners mentality plus skills. if he shows he's ready, thats good enough for me.
Click to expand...

Across all sports we are seeing teenagers show ready to play pro level
Not all teenagers, but it's no longer very exceptionally rare for a teenager to perform like a productive pro
That kid for Red Sox, just turned 20, hit the first homer by a lefty off Chapman in ~6 years!
And twas a 9th inning game-tying opposite-field blast at that

If Lias holds his own in PreSeason and earns a spot on opening night, like ODC says, play him. Shelter him a little, challenge him a little, see if he earns increased minutes
He may be the best choice to fill NYRs 3/4/5 C need
 
Last edited:
NYR Viper said:
Edge, what do you think of the ROR comparison. Everything I have seen, read and heard makes him sound like that exact type of player. Utility knife, very tenacious, leader
Click to expand...

There are a few "types" who come to mind, keeping in mind that it's an approximation and not a skill for skill comparison.

ROR and Huberdeau are more recent comparisons. Drury was a similar player back in his day.

If he can hit that level, the pick is a homerun.

Andersson seems like the type who play in the NHL for a long time, no matter what. The question isn't really whether he brings offense, it's how much offense does he bring?

The thing with Lias is that he has such a good head for the game, that you can't simply look at "skills" and try and project him based on that. If I were put on the spot, I'd project him as a 20 goal, 55 point type. However, he just understands the game so well, and does so many little things, I can't say I'd be surprised if he produces higher.
 
Lias Andersson said:
The nice thing with slotting Andersson in at 3C is that you still have the ability to bump Miller into that role in a pinch or if Andersson really starts to struggle without having Miller relegated to the 3C role permanently.

My bet is Andersson stays with the Rangers. The competition just isn't good enough and what little competition there is is probably more suited to the 4th line anyway.
Click to expand...

What's best for his development? Just because the Rangers have no one else is not a good enough reason. He is 19. He needs to play major minutes.
 
Oh no Rangers never draft a player who makes immediate impact. Rangers suck at drafting. Fire AV. Then Rangers finally pick high enough to grab a player who could make an immediate impact. Oh they are rushing him, stunting his development etc. Fire AV. Just can't please some people.
 
Edge said:
There are a few "types" who come to mind, keeping in mind that it's an approximation and not a skill for skill comparison.

ROR and Huberdeau are more recent comparisons. Drury was a similar player back in his day.

If he can hit that level, the pick is a homerun.

Andersson seems like the type who play in the NHL for a long time, no matter what. The question isn't really whether he brings offense, it's how much offense does he bring?

The thing with Lias is that he has such a good head for the game, that you can't simply look at "skills" and try and project him based on that. If I were put on the spot, I'd project him as a 20 goal, 55 point type. However, he just understands the game so well, and does so many little things, I can't say I'd be surprised if he produces higher.
Click to expand...

How much offense does he bring, but also how much offense can he generate on his own and how much more offense can he generate playing with better players?

In other words is he a guy who put similar number regardless of ES role, or can he take his production up a notch playing with elite offensive talent, while still playing his two way game?
 
cwede said:
Across all sports we are seeing teenagers show ready to play pro level
Not all teenagers, but it's no longer very exceptionally rare for a teenager to perform like a productive pro
That kid for Red Sox, just turned 20, hit the first homer by a lefty off Chapman in ~6 years!
And twas a 9th inning game-tying opposite-field blast at that
Click to expand...
81 years ago yesterday, Bob Feller made his first career MLB start as a 17 year old and struck out 15.
 
McRanger said:
How much offense does he bring, but also how much offense can he generate on his own and how much more offense can he generate playing with better players?

In other words is he a guy who put similar number regardless of ES role, or can he take his production up a notch playing with elite offensive talent, while still playing his two way game?
Click to expand...

Keeping in mind I haven't seen him as much as some of the European posters on here, my opinion on what I've seen is that his intelligence could potentially lend itself well to playing with elite offensive players.

I think Andersson brings a good amount of offense because he sees the flow of the game well. He positions himself well, knows when to shoot and when to pass. I'll agree with the assessment that I don't think he's a first line guy. I don't think he quite has that top end offensive instinct - particularly a top-level shot. He has good hands, but they're not quite top-end either.

He could, in theory, compliment just about most players because he'll adapt to their skill set. I think his offense depends on his role and would increase with higher skilled players. Ideally, you'd pair him with someone who is a shoot first type of player or a guy who gives him some time to get to the front of the net, because I think his goals are likely going to come from deflections, chip-ins and rebounds.
 
Edge said:
Keeping in mind I haven't seen him as much as some of the European posters on here, my opinion on what I've seen is that his intelligence could potentially lend itself well to playing with elite offensive players.

I think Andersson brings a good amount of offense because he sees the flow of the game well. He positions himself well, knows when to shoot and when to pass. I'll agree with the assessment that I don't think he's a first line guy. I don't think he quite has that top end offensive instinct - particularly a top-level shot. He has good hands, but they're not quite top-end either.

He could, in theory, compliment just about most players because he'll adapt to their skill set. I think his offense depends on his role and would increase with higher skilled players. Ideally, you'd pair him with someone who is a shoot first type of player or a guy who gives him some time to get to the front of the net, because I think his goals are likely going to come from deflections, chip-ins and rebounds.
Click to expand...

Hey Edge, glad to see you posting regularly again! Hope all is well with you and your family!!

From what I've been reading from posters and you specifically, he sounds like a guy we just traded...Stepan, but younger/faster!
 
Edge said:
Keeping in mind I haven't seen him as much as some of the European posters on here, my opinion on what I've seen is that his intelligence could potentially lend itself well to playing with elite offensive players.

I think Andersson brings a good amount of offense because he sees the flow of the game well. He positions himself well, knows when to shoot and when to pass. I'll agree with the assessment that I don't think he's a first line guy. I don't think he quite has that top end offensive instinct - particularly a top-level shot. He has good hands, but they're not quite top-end either.

He could, in theory, compliment just about most players because he'll adapt to their skill set. I think his offense depends on his role and would increase with higher skilled players. Ideally, you'd pair him with someone who is a shoot first type of player or a guy who gives him some time to get to the front of the net, because I think his goals are likely going to come from deflections, chip-ins and rebounds.
Click to expand...

He's a modern grinder. I think Steen is his upside.... and wouldn't be surprised if it took 4-6 years before he hits 50 points.

IMO if he's a reliable two way forward that hits 30 5v5 Points, especially as a center... you have a contending piece.

But to your point, he needs Fast, and a net front guy to produce on offense. The Swedes moved away from the torpedo and run a system that's north south until you get into the offensive zone where it's all about puck movement towards the net or hitting the open man.

Rangers are built that way moving forward. So I do expect him, with his footspeed being the deciding factor to make the opening night roster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom