And that right there is the crux of the issue with people's thoughts on Eisenberg's Lex. It seems obvious to me that for most people, it has very little to do with Eisenberg's acting ability, but almost everything to do with their dislike for the actor.
I will admit that there were several actors I would have picked over Eisenberg before his casting, actors like Bradley Cooper, Leo Dicaprio, Joaquin Phoenix, and Matt Damon. Primarily because my favourite depictions of Luthor render a handsome or physically winsome man.
That, however, isn't at the core of the character. Simply described, Luthor is a brilliant, but, narcissistic businessman with a love for scientific research and and the social sciences. Every Lex Luthor must have those characteristics. Everything else is dependant on the plot.
As a result, even though I wasn't thrilled by Eisenberg's casting, I decided to keep an open mind since he is unquestionably a great actor, and obviously has the ability to pull of an intelligent, narcissistic, and privileged man.
Since then, everything I've been reading and now seeing about Luthor in this film has moved me from a guy with an open mind to a guy who is almost certain that Eisenberg will be a great Luthor.
The issue though, is that a lot of people don't want to accept him as Luthor because they simply dislike Eisenberg, and frankly, from what I've been reading, many people do not understand the character as well as they think they do.
It is also helpful to remember that just as Superman wasn't the established and mature Superman in Man of Steel, the same will be true for Luthor in Batman V Superman. Lex Luthor isn't evil for evil's sake, he is evil because his narcissistic nature forces him to be so as a result of Superman's existence. He truly believes that Superman's quest to help mankind actually hurts it in an evolutionary sense, and in some ways, he has a point.
Ben Affleck's casting for Batman was almost universally despised (I thought it was great casting), and as expected, that has changed dramatically after people learned and saw more of him as Batman. Well, I think people should wait before discrediting Eisenberg as Luthor. Hilariously, the harshest fans of there, comic-books fans, are a lot more accepting of Eisenberg as Lex than the general public is, just as they were when Affleck was cast as Batman. That says a lot.
Lol sorry for the essays, I am just thoroughly enjoying these discussions.
Mr Robot is awesome. Watch it.
I wish Sense8 had received a couple Emmy nominations.
"That much"????
I said I would have liked it to receive a couple Emmy nominations, that is not some grand threshold.
'Batman Vs Superman' Star Henry Cavill & Armie Hammer(The Lone Ranger)
FYI Arnie Hammer was supposed to play Batman. You can visibly see how gutted he is when the interviewer brings up BvS.
I bet it would be a lot of fun to see Lex Luthor portrayed by any of the actors you mentioned. Luthor deserves someone with a better on screen presence. Interesting that you describe LL as a handsome/winsome man. The actor I envision looking most like Lex Luthor would be Bruce Willis. He even has the whole shaved head thing going on. Eisenberg looks too much like a young scheming preppy rich boy than Superman's equal.
Also interesting that you mention Luthor as not being evil. From humanity's standpoint he can even be considered the good guy. Superman is an unstoppable alien that's lost control or had his mind taken over on several occasions. Lex is the smartest man in the world, got elected president of the USA last time I read one of the many stories around, and has done his best to keep humanity on par with the superheroes who try to do their own thing in the world. He's the only interesting character in the DC universe outside of Batman.
Tey are supposed to be the same age or Lex a little older. You can't have Lex looking like a teenager while Clarke is 33 years old. His character just wont be taken seriously if he doesnt look the part regardless of good of an actor you think he is. A bunch of actors would have been a better casting, very weak!That's the point: He isn't supposed to look like Superman's equal. Superman has several other villains that look like his equals. And many of them are great villains, however, what makes Luthor special is that he doesn't look like Superman's equal, and yet he presents the greatest challenges to Superman's desire to "save the world" simply because of his genuine belief that Superman is a bad guy for the world. As a result, he resolves to use his intellect, wealth, and influence to stop Superman. Eisenberg looks like a young, scheming preppy boy because that's what Lex Luthor was at that age.
This is what I read about him being batman:
http://variety.com/2013/film/news/why-armie-hammer-wont-play-batman-henry-cavill-1200572112/
So are you sure he was supposed to play?
It seemed like he was supposed to play a movie than never came to and wanted little to do with this one.
How does he come across?
Do you watch Polanski films?
OITNB is now a drama? This is confusing.
I watched Apollo 13 today, been a while since a movie made me tear up at the end.
Can't wait for Southpaw, always enjoy boxing movies
The only thing i do not like about him is when he starts to cry when one of his films did not win a prize, as if the others directors could not make excellent movies too. But that's all.
It only happened once and he was only upset his movie wasn't NOMINATED to the Oscars.
And he was right. Mommy was one of the most acclaimed international movie last year and they didn't select it out of 9 movies.
2015 Emmy Noms
SUPPORTING ACTOR, DRAMA
Jonathan Banks, “Better Call Saulâ€
Ben Mendelsohn, “Bloodlineâ€
Jim Carter, “Downton Abbeyâ€
Peter Dinklage, “Game Of Thronesâ€
Alan *******, “The Good Wifeâ€
Michael Kelly, “House Of Cardsâ€
I don't think that was it... I think he was more frustrated when Laurence Anyways wasn't accepted to the Cannes film festival.