I always assume the PTBNL is a draft pick. The Jays pick who the Nats want and once selected he's flipped over to them.
No I'm pretty sure it can't be. PTBNL has to be named within 6 months, I think the new rule changed it so that drafted players have to wait 6 months before being traded(instead of the old 12), players picked next draft won't be eligible to be traded soon enough by the time the PTBNL has to be named.
it's likely varying players based on the amount of cash the Nats are paying us because that's still undetermined because both Revere and Storen are up for arbitration. Once that's decided then the player will be named. Probably nobody either way unless it's some massive difference in money which would probably see a better prospect go but that won't happen.
[/B]
How has the issue been rectified? Have Saunders or Pompey been in some secret league tearing the cover off the ball? Or are you basing this on past statistics. If thats the case, the issue has not been rectified and id say there's a better chance we'd be dealing with a struggling Pompey after a fragile Saunders gets hurt.
Well the Jays seem to think so. They went into last season with Saunders, Pompey and Pillar in 2 of the 3 outfield spots. That was their solution. 2 of those options dissapeared as Saunders got hurt and Pompey stuggled and the team deemed he needed another year in the minors. Those options are there again now just like they were last year when management thought they were adequate. That's the solution
Sure there's the chance Saunders is garbage coming off his injury, and Pompey continues to struggle, but both happening is unlikely, keeping a 3rd option around that's making 3 times the other 2 conbined because of a small chance something bad happens when you can use said piece to get a massive improvement in the pen woyuldn't be prudent. If there's still a hole in LF mid-season we'll just trade 2 more nothing prospects for a left fielder like we did last year to get Revere.
There was quite a lot of hate for Revere. It was constant whining about him, people even complained when he got on base. Nothing wrong with saying he doesn't have the best arm or doesn't have any power in his bat but complaining for the sake of complaining isn't accurately assessing a player. Maybe you weren't hating on him but it doesn't mean that there weren't people doing it. There was quite a lot of it
People didn't complain about Revere when he got on base. People sarcastically prepared themselves for the "look Revere is so amazing" posts that were coming or already there. Every time Revere came to the plate there was a argument over the merits of his tools regardless of whether he got on base or not.
Nobody was complaining about Revere getting on base, people were complaining about having to post the same crap everytime when people fawned over Revere explaining his usefulness and lack of usefulness. I know it's not something you want to hear but the irritation was never with Revere it was with all the posters who loved to argue about Revere.
The posts right now were the exact same as then. and went something like this. He can hit singles at a 30% rate, and steal a base. However there's a lot of stuff he doesn't do well and that will make him overpaid and likely traded in the offseason.
Hey look who was just traded in the offseason.